lev-os Managing Regulation Best Interest
Evaluates compliance with Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) under SEC Rule 15l-1, covering the four core obligations: Disclosure, Care, Conflict of Interest, and Compliance. Use this skill to assess broker-dealer recommendation practices, build or audit Reg BI programs, and produce actionable compliance reports.
When To Use
- Implementing a new Reg BI compliance program at a broker-dealer or dual-registrant firm
- Auditing existing recommendation practices against Reg BI's four obligations
- Reviewing Form CRS (Client Relationship Summary) content and delivery procedures
- Evaluating whether a specific recommendation meets the Care Obligation standard
- Documenting conflict-of-interest mitigation measures (e.g., compensation structures, proprietary product incentives)
- Preparing for SEC examination or responding to Reg BI-related deficiency findings
- Assessing whether a firm's policies and procedures satisfy the Compliance Obligation
Inputs To Gather
- Firm profile: Broker-dealer registration status, dual-registrant structure, product shelf composition (proprietary vs. third-party)
- Form CRS: Current version, delivery logs, and any SEC staff comments or deficiency letters
- Recommendation documentation: Account opening records, suitability questionnaires, investment profiles, and recommendation rationale records
- Compensation and incentive structures: Commission schedules, revenue-sharing arrangements, sales contests, quotas, bonus triggers
- Policies and procedures: Written supervisory procedures (WSPs), compliance manuals, conflict-of-interest policies, escalation protocols
- Training records: Reg BI training completion logs, content covered, frequency
- Examination history: Prior SEC or FINRA exam findings, corrective actions taken, outstanding deficiencies
Workflow
Map the four obligations to firm operations
- Disclosure Obligation: Identify all material facts about the scope and terms of the relationship, fees, conflicts, and limitations on product offerings that must be disclosed before or at the time of recommendation
- Care Obligation: Confirm the firm evaluates reasonably available alternatives, considers cost as a factor, and does not place its own interests ahead of the retail customer's
- Conflict of Interest Obligation: Catalog conflicts (compensation-based, product-based, account-type-based) and verify that policies either eliminate or mitigate and disclose each conflict
- Compliance Obligation: Verify written policies and procedures are reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the first three obligations
Assess Form CRS adequacy
- Confirm the Form CRS covers required items: services offered, fees and costs, conflicts, disciplinary history, and the required conversation-starter questions
- Verify delivery timing: at or before the earliest of a recommendation, placing an order, or opening an account [VERIFY: confirm current SEC guidance on electronic delivery standards]
- Check that the form is filed with the SEC via EDGAR and posted on the firm's public website
Evaluate the Care Obligation in practice
- Review a sample of recent recommendations for documentation of: customer investment profile consideration, product-level cost comparison with reasonably available alternatives, and rationale for why the recommendation is in the customer's best interest
- For account-type recommendations (e.g., brokerage vs. advisory), confirm the firm documents why the recommended account type is in the customer's best interest
- Identify any rollover recommendations and verify enhanced scrutiny procedures [VERIFY: check for updated SEC staff guidance on rollover recommendation documentation]
Audit conflict identification and mitigation
- Review compensation grids, revenue-sharing agreements, and sales incentive programs for conflicts that could influence recommendations
- Confirm the firm has identified and addressed conflicts arising from: proprietary products, limited product menus, differential compensation, sales contests/quotas/bonuses, and volume-based revenue sharing
- Verify mitigation measures are operational (e.g., leveled compensation, product-neutral incentives, enhanced supervision for high-conflict products)
Test the Compliance Obligation infrastructure
- Review WSPs for Reg BI-specific sections addressing each obligation
- Confirm supervisory review procedures exist for flagging and escalating potentially non-compliant recommendations
- Verify training is current and covers obligation-specific content, not just general suitability concepts
- Check that the firm conducts periodic self-assessments or internal audits of Reg BI compliance
Document findings and produce compliance report
- Summarize obligation-by-obligation status (compliant, partially compliant, deficient)
- Identify specific gaps with supporting evidence (missing documentation, undisclosed conflicts, insufficient cost analysis)
- Recommend remedial actions with priority and timeline
- Flag areas requiring [VERIFY] for jurisdiction-specific or evolving regulatory interpretations
Output
The compliance report should include:
- Executive summary: Overall Reg BI compliance posture with obligation-level ratings
- Obligation-by-obligation assessment: Findings organized under Disclosure, Care, Conflict of Interest, and Compliance headings, each with specific observations and evidence references
- Form CRS review: Content adequacy, delivery compliance, and filing status
- Conflict inventory: Table of identified conflicts, current mitigation measures, and residual risk assessment
- Gap analysis: Specific deficiencies with regulatory citation (Rule 15l-1 subsections), risk rating (high/medium/low), and recommended corrective actions
- Remediation roadmap: Prioritized action items with responsible parties and target completion dates
- Appendices: Sample recommendation reviews, compensation structure summaries, training completion data
Quality Checks
- Each of the four Reg BI obligations is separately and specifically addressed — no obligation is collapsed into another or omitted
- Findings cite the specific subsection of Rule 15l-1 (e.g., (a)(2)(i) for Disclosure) rather than generic "Reg BI" references [VERIFY: confirm current rule numbering against latest Federal Register version]
- Cost comparisons in the Care Obligation section reference actual fee data, not hypothetical examples
- Conflict inventory covers all SEC-identified conflict categories: compensation, product, and account-type conflicts
- Form CRS assessment addresses both content and delivery/filing requirements
- Remediation recommendations are specific and actionable — not generic directives like "improve compliance"
- Report distinguishes between firm-level policy gaps and individual-recommendation failures
- All jurisdiction-dependent or evolving-standard items are marked with [VERIFY]