Mediation Statement
Drafts a mediation statement that educates the mediator on case strengths and positions the client for favorable settlement. Works for both plaintiff and defense — adjust framing accordingly.
Prerequisites
Gather before drafting:
- Case file — complaint, answer, case number, mediation date, mediator name
- Confidentiality designation — mediator-only or shared with opposing counsel
- Discovery materials — deposition transcripts, interrogatory responses, document production
- Medical records — treatment history, bills, expert reports (PI cases)
- Settlement history — all demands and offers with dates
- Key exhibits — photos, contracts, communications, expert reports
Quick Start
Target 5–15 pages, single-spaced, numbered exhibits. Submit 7–10 days before mediation unless mediator specifies otherwise.
Sections
1. Header & Introduction
Caption (Party v. Party, Case No.), mediation date, mediator name, brief cooperative opening.
2. Executive Summary
2–3 sentences: case type, central disputed issue, client's position.
3. Factual Background
Present chronologically with strategic framing:
- Lead with context favorable to client
- Key dates, times, locations, witnesses
- Reference exhibits by number
- Active voice for opponent's bad acts; passive for client's unfavorable facts
- Plaintiff: dangerous conditions, lack of warnings, defendant knowledge
- Defense: plaintiff's conduct, obvious hazards, proper maintenance
4. Liability Analysis
Structure element-by-element (duty → breach → causation → comparative fault):
- Cite applicable statutes and case law
- Show why each element favors client
- Distinguish adverse authority
- Preemptively rebut opponent's strongest arguments
5. Testimony & Discovery
- Highlight favorable admissions from opposing party
- Identify contradictions, credibility problems, discovery gaps
- Cite specific deposition pages; attach key excerpts as exhibits selectively
6. Medical/Injury Analysis
PI cases — analyze each category with client-favorable framing:
| Category |
Focus |
| Pre-incident history |
Frame favorably for client |
| Post-incident treatment |
Records vs. claims |
| Causation |
Medical evidence linking injuries to incident |
| Objective vs. subjective |
Emphasize objective findings |
| Treatment gaps |
Inconsistencies, delayed treatment |
| Activity level |
Exaggeration or genuine limitation |
Non-PI cases — analyze business records, contracts, communications; assess damage documentation.
7. Damages Analysis
Break down each category and assess credibility:
- Medical bills — reasonable/necessary vs. excessive/unrelated
- Lost wages — documented vs. speculative
- Pain and suffering — objective support vs. subjective claims
- Property/economic losses — properly calculated vs. speculative
- Expert opinions — reliability, basis, methodology
Frame in light most favorable to client.
8. Expert Witness Analysis
- Client's expert: qualifications, methodology, key opinions
- Opponent's expert: weaknesses, potential bias
- Anticipated trial impact
9. Trial Outlook
- Jury appeal — which party benefits and why
- Pending motions (MSJ, motions in limine)
- Evidentiary and credibility problems opponent faces
- Costs/fees exposure; appeal risks
10. Settlement History
Chronological table of all demands and offers (date, party, amount, notes). Analyze movement and why opponent's current position is unrealistic.
11. Settlement Path
Do not propose a specific number. Instead:
- Identify what opponent must concede
- Describe non-settlement consequences (cost, time, risk)
- Address impediments to resolution
- Frame which side has further to move and why
12. Exhibits
Attach only high-impact documents: key deposition excerpts, medical chronologies, expert reports, critical communications. Limit volume — excess dilutes impact.
Guidelines
- Tone: Persuasive and professional — advocate hard but do not overstate disprovable facts
- Confidentiality: Mediator-only statements can be more candid about weaknesses and realistic ranges
- Jurisdiction: U.S. practice; adjust for state-specific mediation confidentiality rules
- Ethics: Strategic framing is appropriate; misrepresentation of facts or law is not
Checklist
1---2name: mediation-statement3description: Drafts persuasive mediation statements for litigation, structuring narrative across liability, damages, medical evidence, experts, and settlement positioning for plaintiff or defense. Use when preparing mediation briefs, settlement statements, ADR submissions, or pre-mediation filings.4---56# Mediation Statement78Drafts a mediation statement that educates the mediator on case strengths and positions the client for favorable settlement. Works for both plaintiff and defense — adjust framing accordingly.910## Prerequisites1112Gather before drafting:13141. **Case file** — complaint, answer, case number, mediation date, mediator name152. **Confidentiality designation** — mediator-only or shared with opposing counsel163. **Discovery materials** — deposition transcripts, interrogatory responses, document production174. **Medical records** — treatment history, bills, expert reports (PI cases)185. **Settlement history** — all demands and offers with dates196. **Key exhibits** — photos, contracts, communications, expert reports2021## Quick Start2223Target 5–15 pages, single-spaced, numbered exhibits. Submit 7–10 days before mediation unless mediator specifies otherwise.2425## Sections2627### 1. Header & Introduction2829Caption (Party v. Party, Case No.), mediation date, mediator name, brief cooperative opening.3031### 2. Executive Summary32332–3 sentences: case type, central disputed issue, client's position.3435### 3. Factual Background3637Present chronologically with strategic framing:38- Lead with context favorable to client39- Key dates, times, locations, witnesses40- Reference exhibits by number41- Active voice for opponent's bad acts; passive for client's unfavorable facts42- **Plaintiff**: dangerous conditions, lack of warnings, defendant knowledge43- **Defense**: plaintiff's conduct, obvious hazards, proper maintenance4445### 4. Liability Analysis4647Structure element-by-element (duty → breach → causation → comparative fault):48- Cite applicable statutes and case law49- Show why each element favors client50- Distinguish adverse authority51- Preemptively rebut opponent's strongest arguments5253### 5. Testimony & Discovery5455- Highlight favorable admissions from opposing party56- Identify contradictions, credibility problems, discovery gaps57- Cite specific deposition pages; attach key excerpts as exhibits selectively5859### 6. Medical/Injury Analysis6061**PI cases** — analyze each category with client-favorable framing:6263| Category | Focus |64|----------|-------|65| Pre-incident history | Frame favorably for client |66| Post-incident treatment | Records vs. claims |67| Causation | Medical evidence linking injuries to incident |68| Objective vs. subjective | Emphasize objective findings |69| Treatment gaps | Inconsistencies, delayed treatment |70| Activity level | Exaggeration or genuine limitation |7172**Non-PI cases** — analyze business records, contracts, communications; assess damage documentation.7374### 7. Damages Analysis7576Break down each category and assess credibility:77- Medical bills — reasonable/necessary vs. excessive/unrelated78- Lost wages — documented vs. speculative79- Pain and suffering — objective support vs. subjective claims80- Property/economic losses — properly calculated vs. speculative81- Expert opinions — reliability, basis, methodology8283Frame in light most favorable to client.8485### 8. Expert Witness Analysis8687- Client's expert: qualifications, methodology, key opinions88- Opponent's expert: weaknesses, potential bias89- Anticipated trial impact9091### 9. Trial Outlook9293- Jury appeal — which party benefits and why94- Pending motions (MSJ, motions in limine)95- Evidentiary and credibility problems opponent faces96- Costs/fees exposure; appeal risks9798### 10. Settlement History99100Chronological table of all demands and offers (date, party, amount, notes). Analyze movement and why opponent's current position is unrealistic.101102### 11. Settlement Path103104Do **not** propose a specific number. Instead:105- Identify what opponent must concede106- Describe non-settlement consequences (cost, time, risk)107- Address impediments to resolution108- Frame which side has further to move and why109110### 12. Exhibits111112Attach only high-impact documents: key deposition excerpts, medical chronologies, expert reports, critical communications. Limit volume — excess dilutes impact.113114## Guidelines115116- **Tone**: Persuasive and professional — advocate hard but do not overstate disprovable facts117- **Confidentiality**: Mediator-only statements can be more candid about weaknesses and realistic ranges118- **Jurisdiction**: U.S. practice; adjust for state-specific mediation confidentiality rules119- **Ethics**: Strategic framing is appropriate; misrepresentation of facts or law is not120121## Checklist122123- [ ] Persuasive tone throughout124- [ ] Client's position clearly articulated125- [ ] Opponent's weaknesses supported with specific evidence126- [ ] Settlement path provided without proposing a number127- [ ] Mediator name and date correct128- [ ] Exhibits numbered and referenced in text129- [ ] Proofread for grammar, spelling, formatting
lev-os