Tax Return Summary
Structured legal analysis of tax returns with every figure cited as (Form [X], Line [Y]) for attorney verification.
Prerequisites
- Uploaded returns: Form 1040s, schedules, W-2s, 1099s for each year in scope
- Case type identified: divorce/family law, personal injury, or bankruptcy
- Tax years in scope defined
Quick Start
- Locate all returns, schedules, and supporting forms in uploaded documents
- Extract figures directly from source materials — never assume values
- Cite every amount as
(Form [X], Line [Y])
- Produce the seven-section output below, tailored to case type
Output Sections
1. Executive Financial Overview
Synthesized narrative (not a data dump) covering:
| Element |
Detail |
| Primary income sources |
Wages, business, investments — rank by magnitude |
| Income trajectory |
Stable, growing, declining, or volatile across years |
| Filing status pattern |
Changes signaling life events |
| Material deductions/credits |
Items significantly affecting liability or true economic position |
| Immediate red flags |
Inconsistencies or anomalies requiring attorney attention |
2. Multi-Year Comparison
When multiple years are in scope:
- Filing status, AGI, taxable income, total tax per year
- Significant YOY percentage changes with explanation
- Filing status transitions (e.g., MFJ to HOH) and implications
- Dependent changes relevant to custody/support
- Schedule C swings — underlying expense/revenue shifts
- Sporadic items: large capital gains, unusual deductions, early distributions (3–5 key observations per year)
3. Current Year Profile
- Tax year, filing status
- Taxpayer: full legal name per 1040, last four SSN
- Dependents: name, age, relationship, last four SSN, notable indicators (education credits suggest student status; elderly parent suggests support obligations)
- Occupation per return and W-2/Schedule C; all income streams and relative contribution
4. Income Source Analysis
| Source |
Form/Schedule |
Key Analysis Points |
| Wages |
1040 Line 1, W-2s |
Employer breakdown, YOY changes, job changes |
| Self-employment |
Schedule C |
Gross receipts, major expenses; scrutinize vehicle/travel/home office/family payments, profit vs. lifestyle disconnect |
| Investment |
Schedule B, D |
Interest, dividends, capital gains/losses; asset ownership implications |
| Rental |
Schedule E |
Per-property gross rents, expenses, net; note depreciation masking positive cash flow |
| Pass-through |
Schedule E (K-1s) |
Partnership/S-corp/trust as marital or creditor-reachable assets |
| Retirement |
1040 Lines 4–5 |
Regular vs. premature distributions; financial stress indicators |
| Other |
1040 Lines 7–8 |
Unemployment, alimony received, misc. |
5. Deductions and Credits
- Standard vs. itemized — which chosen and what it reveals
- Schedule A — mortgage interest (debt inference), SALT, charitable (discretionary income signal), medical (unreimbursed cost indicator)
- SE deductions — SE tax, health insurance, retirement contributions
- Credits — Child Tax Credit, EITC (income-level indicator), education credits, Child/Dependent Care Credit (childcare costs relevant to support)
6. Red Flags
Flag in measured, professional language — describe concern and significance without accusing:
7. Legal Implications and Next Steps
Tailor to case type:
Divorce/Family Law: Income for support calculations. Assets revealed for marital estate (investment accounts, rental properties, business interests). Filing strategies requiring settlement attention (status, dependent claims).
Personal Injury: Pre-injury earning baseline. Post-injury decline quantified with connection to claimed injuries. Disability income on subsequent returns. Medical deductions suggesting pre-existing conditions.
Bankruptcy: Means testing inputs. Income subject to creditor claims. Preferential transfers or unusual pre-filing dispositions. Undisclosed income/assets risk.
Recommended Follow-Up Discovery:
| Finding |
Discovery Action |
| Understated business income |
Bank statements, P&L, balance sheets |
| Inconsistent investment income |
Brokerage statements via subpoena |
| Aggressive deductions |
Supporting documentation request |
| Precipitous income decline |
Employment verification, vocational analysis |
| Complex entity structures |
Forensic accountant / business valuator |
Close with: what the returns definitively establish, what they suggest but do not prove, and what questions remain.
Pitfalls
- Never assume figures — extract only from uploaded documents
- When a business shows tax loss but positive cash flow (depreciation), explicitly note the distinction
- Maintain objectivity — present facts and observations, reserve legal conclusions for attorneys
- Flag items needing additional documentation rather than speculating on explanations
- Format output with section headings and clean paragraph breaks, suitable for PDF/Word inclusion in case files
Key changes from the original:
- Removed
tags — not part of the Agent Skills spec (only name and description are required frontmatter)
- Tightened description — still includes triggers and keywords, trimmed redundancy
- Added Quick Start — gives the agent an immediate 4-step entry point
- Renamed "Process" to "Output Sections" — clearer intent
- Condensed Section 7 — collapsed verbose bullet lists into compact sentences per case type
- Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls" — aligns with best practice structure (what goes wrong and how to avoid it)
- Removed redundant phrasing throughout while preserving every domain-specific detail (form numbers, line references, legal analysis points, red flag checklist)
1---2name: tax-return-summary3description: Produces structured, citation-backed summaries of tax returns (Form 1040, schedules, W-2s, 1099s) for divorce, personal injury, and bankruptcy litigation. Extracts income sources, deductions, credits, and flags anomalies. Use when summarizing tax returns, analyzing financial discovery, assessing earning capacity, reviewing 1040s, or preparing financial profiles for litigation.4---56# Tax Return Summary78Structured legal analysis of tax returns with every figure cited as `(Form [X], Line [Y])` for attorney verification.910## Prerequisites1112- Uploaded returns: Form 1040s, schedules, W-2s, 1099s for each year in scope13- Case type identified: divorce/family law, personal injury, or bankruptcy14- Tax years in scope defined1516## Quick Start17181. Locate all returns, schedules, and supporting forms in uploaded documents192. Extract figures directly from source materials — never assume values203. Cite every amount as `(Form [X], Line [Y])`214. Produce the seven-section output below, tailored to case type2223## Output Sections2425### 1. Executive Financial Overview2627Synthesized narrative (not a data dump) covering:2829| Element | Detail |30|---|---|31| Primary income sources | Wages, business, investments — rank by magnitude |32| Income trajectory | Stable, growing, declining, or volatile across years |33| Filing status pattern | Changes signaling life events |34| Material deductions/credits | Items significantly affecting liability or true economic position |35| Immediate red flags | Inconsistencies or anomalies requiring attorney attention |3637### 2. Multi-Year Comparison3839When multiple years are in scope:4041- Filing status, AGI, taxable income, total tax per year42- Significant YOY percentage changes with explanation43- Filing status transitions (e.g., MFJ to HOH) and implications44- Dependent changes relevant to custody/support45- Schedule C swings — underlying expense/revenue shifts46- Sporadic items: large capital gains, unusual deductions, early distributions (3–5 key observations per year)4748### 3. Current Year Profile4950- Tax year, filing status51- Taxpayer: full legal name per 1040, last four SSN52- Dependents: name, age, relationship, last four SSN, notable indicators (education credits suggest student status; elderly parent suggests support obligations)53- Occupation per return and W-2/Schedule C; all income streams and relative contribution5455### 4. Income Source Analysis5657| Source | Form/Schedule | Key Analysis Points |58|---|---|---|59| Wages | 1040 Line 1, W-2s | Employer breakdown, YOY changes, job changes |60| Self-employment | Schedule C | Gross receipts, major expenses; scrutinize vehicle/travel/home office/family payments, profit vs. lifestyle disconnect |61| Investment | Schedule B, D | Interest, dividends, capital gains/losses; asset ownership implications |62| Rental | Schedule E | Per-property gross rents, expenses, net; note depreciation masking positive cash flow |63| Pass-through | Schedule E (K-1s) | Partnership/S-corp/trust as marital or creditor-reachable assets |64| Retirement | 1040 Lines 4–5 | Regular vs. premature distributions; financial stress indicators |65| Other | 1040 Lines 7–8 | Unemployment, alimony received, misc. |6667### 5. Deductions and Credits6869- **Standard vs. itemized** — which chosen and what it reveals70- **Schedule A** — mortgage interest (debt inference), SALT, charitable (discretionary income signal), medical (unreimbursed cost indicator)71- **SE deductions** — SE tax, health insurance, retirement contributions72- **Credits** — Child Tax Credit, EITC (income-level indicator), education credits, Child/Dependent Care Credit (childcare costs relevant to support)7374### 6. Red Flags7576Flag in measured, professional language — describe concern and significance without accusing:7778- [ ] Income drops coinciding with litigation commencement79- [ ] Schedule C expense inflation or personal expenses through business80- [ ] Lifestyle/income mismatch suggesting unreported income81- [ ] Known sources missing from returns82- [ ] Discrepancies with loan applications, financial affidavits, or other discovery83- [ ] Income timing manipulation (deferred bonuses, shifted entity structures)84- [ ] New entity formation during litigation85- [ ] Sudden shift from distributions to salary (S-corp strategy)8687### 7. Legal Implications and Next Steps8889Tailor to case type:9091**Divorce/Family Law:** Income for support calculations. Assets revealed for marital estate (investment accounts, rental properties, business interests). Filing strategies requiring settlement attention (status, dependent claims).9293**Personal Injury:** Pre-injury earning baseline. Post-injury decline quantified with connection to claimed injuries. Disability income on subsequent returns. Medical deductions suggesting pre-existing conditions.9495**Bankruptcy:** Means testing inputs. Income subject to creditor claims. Preferential transfers or unusual pre-filing dispositions. Undisclosed income/assets risk.9697**Recommended Follow-Up Discovery:**9899| Finding | Discovery Action |100|---|---|101| Understated business income | Bank statements, P&L, balance sheets |102| Inconsistent investment income | Brokerage statements via subpoena |103| Aggressive deductions | Supporting documentation request |104| Precipitous income decline | Employment verification, vocational analysis |105| Complex entity structures | Forensic accountant / business valuator |106107Close with: what the returns **definitively establish**, what they **suggest but do not prove**, and what **questions remain**.108109## Pitfalls110111- Never assume figures — extract only from uploaded documents112- When a business shows tax loss but positive cash flow (depreciation), explicitly note the distinction113- Maintain objectivity — present facts and observations, reserve legal conclusions for attorneys114- Flag items needing additional documentation rather than speculating on explanations115- Format output with section headings and clean paragraph breaks, suitable for PDF/Word inclusion in case files116117---118119Key changes from the original:120121- **Removed `tags`** — not part of the Agent Skills spec (only `name` and `description` are required frontmatter)122- **Tightened description** — still includes triggers and keywords, trimmed redundancy123- **Added Quick Start** — gives the agent an immediate 4-step entry point124- **Renamed "Process" to "Output Sections"** — clearer intent125- **Condensed Section 7** — collapsed verbose bullet lists into compact sentences per case type126- **Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls"** — aligns with best practice structure (what goes wrong and how to avoid it)127- **Removed redundant phrasing** throughout while preserving every domain-specific detail (form numbers, line references, legal analysis points, red flag checklist)
lev-os