Attention Management
Principle expression
Primary: P09
Supporting: P04, P03, P15
Scope
Own one recurring judgment: at an Agent decision boundary, which governing
relation should occupy active attention next, and what is the smallest
reorientation that restores it?
This Skill manages the live relation among task, authority, acceptance,
evidence, and current action. It does not own their source meaning. It does not
turn a todo list into a semantic authority, make every local issue part of the
mainline, or preserve an obsolete goal after the Principal has switched tasks.
Use context-engineering when the unresolved judgment is which runtime surface
can deliver source information. Use agent-delegation when the relation is
settled and the question is which bounded contribution should leave Main. Use
practice-cycle after an observation when the unresolved judgment is the next
practice rather than the active governing relation.
Principle source
Use the host Sequence and the matching P09, P04, P03, and P15 interpretations
when the host declares them. Otherwise use the read-only fallback in
references/sequence.md.
Dispatch
- For a live drift, correction, or branch-ownership judgment, use the core
method below and load no optional reference by default.
- When the failure is difficult to distinguish from context delivery, memory,
planning, or task switching, read
references/concepts.md.
- When constructing a working-character, role-entry, catchphrase, or habit
candidate, read
references/disposition-carriers.md.
- When comparing any attention treatment, read
references/evaluation.md and
load the carrier reference only if that treatment's semantic atoms must be
inspected.
Start
Recover only the state that can change the next action:
Authoritative active task and current acceptance:
Current phase and next consequential decision:
Governing relation that should shape it:
New observation, correction, or distracting branch:
Why the branch may or may not affect acceptance:
Current candidate action:
Observation that would show the attention judgment is wrong:
If the task has already completed, paused, been handed off, or been replaced by
a later Principal message, form the new task. Do not call that a return to the
old mainline.
Core method
- Form the current object. Read the active human message and its relevant
source state. Separate the task that is authoritative now from an older goal,
an implementation plan, and the loudest local problem. Do not infer the
object from a preferred Principle or slogan.
- State the execution anchor. Compress only the active goal, acceptance,
authority/source boundary, current phase, governing relation, and retained
obligations. This projection is replaceable and may be rebuilt from sources;
it is not a second task record.
- Classify the disturbance. Choose one:
continue: the current action still advances the anchor;
retain: the branch blocks acceptance, invalidates a load-bearing
assumption, or changes the governing relation, so it belongs in the active
line for now;
return: the branch is settled, non-blocking, or evidence-only, so restore
the next anchor action;
switch: the Principal completed, paused, handed off, or replaced the
active task, so reconstruct a new anchor;
ask: authority or meaning is genuinely ambiguous and different answers
would materially change the transition.
- Choose the smallest control. Take no control when attention is already
correct. Use a compact cue when the anchor is valid but buried. Use a reset
when a correction or evidence rejects an assumption: replace the obsolete
attention unit with the new invariant instead of appending another reminder.
Re-form the anchor on a true task switch. Keep a load-bearing branch active
only until its named return condition.
- Rebind an existing candidate action—or hand off. When one candidate
action already exists, verify that it changes acceptance, resolves the
retained relation, or obtains evidence that decides between them. When the
governing relation is restored but the next practice remains undecided,
return the reconstructed anchor and observations to
practice-cycle; do not
select the practice here. Externalize secondary obligations rather than
recursively following every new defect.
- Observe the transition. Check the first action after a boundary, hard
constraints, irrelevant branch depth, return latency, and whole-task
acceptance. Vocabulary, confidence, role declaration, or reminder
reproduction do not prove correct attention.
- Cultivate only from recurrence. When the same failure repeats, inspect
only the matching optional reference from the dispatch above. Preserve
hypotheses and negative results; do not silently promote them into the core
method.
Compact result
Execution anchor:
Disturbance: continue | retain | return | switch | ask
Reason it changes or does not change acceptance:
Control: none | cue | reset | reform | clarify
Rebound candidate action or handoff:
Retained obligation and return/reopen signal:
Evidence to observe:
Do not emit this packet merely to narrate ordinary progress. Use it when it
changes the next action, restores a lost mainline, or creates reconstructable
evidence for an attention treatment.
Boundaries
- Do not claim that model weights changed, neural activity persisted, or
Transformer attention decayed from prompt behavior alone.
- Do not repeat a full system prompt merely because a task is long. Selective
reactivation is a treatment to test, not a ritual.
- Do not let a catchphrase, character, plan, summary, or status field outrank
the Principal message and authoritative sources it projects.
- When a delegated task needs owner/status/dependency visibility, use the
existing coordination projection owned by the development method; this Skill
restores attention to the governing relation but does not become the project
plan or delegation tracker.
- Do not force every task through an orientation ceremony. Additional
reasoning, latency, and context are costs and possible confounders.
- Do not use a return-to-mainline cue after a genuine task switch.
- Do not route through Workbench, Work Cell, or a vendor hook unless their
separately owned persistent state or runtime capability is actually needed.
Completion standard
Attention is restored when the current task and governing relation are source
linked, the disturbance has a justified disposition, the next action advances
acceptance or resolves a load-bearing branch, obsolete anchors no longer govern
the task, and any claimed treatment effect has matched behavioral evidence.
1---2name: attention-management3description: Restore and maintain the governing relation for an Agent's next action when a long task drifts into a local branch, a correction changes assumptions, a phase transition buries the mainline, or recurring reminders, role-entry, or prompt habits need evaluation. Use for "manage agent attention", "return to the mainline", "attention drift", "保持主线", "注意力管理", "提示词衰退", or when the governing relation has drifted and a branch needs retention, return, reset, or reform judgment. Do not use to author doctrine, plan an entire project, configure vendor hooks, or infer neural activation from behavioral output.4---56# Attention Management78## Principle expression910**Primary:** P0911**Supporting:** P04, P03, P151213## Scope1415Own one recurring judgment: **at an Agent decision boundary, which governing16relation should occupy active attention next, and what is the smallest17reorientation that restores it?**1819This Skill manages the live relation among task, authority, acceptance,20evidence, and current action. It does not own their source meaning. It does not21turn a todo list into a semantic authority, make every local issue part of the22mainline, or preserve an obsolete goal after the Principal has switched tasks.2324Use `context-engineering` when the unresolved judgment is which runtime surface25can deliver source information. Use `agent-delegation` when the relation is26settled and the question is which bounded contribution should leave Main. Use27`practice-cycle` after an observation when the unresolved judgment is the next28practice rather than the active governing relation.2930## Principle source3132Use the host Sequence and the matching P09, P04, P03, and P15 interpretations33when the host declares them. Otherwise use the read-only fallback in34`references/sequence.md`.3536## Dispatch3738- For a live drift, correction, or branch-ownership judgment, use the core39 method below and load no optional reference by default.40- When the failure is difficult to distinguish from context delivery, memory,41 planning, or task switching, read `references/concepts.md`.42- When constructing a working-character, role-entry, catchphrase, or habit43 candidate, read `references/disposition-carriers.md`.44- When comparing any attention treatment, read `references/evaluation.md` and45 load the carrier reference only if that treatment's semantic atoms must be46 inspected.4748## Start4950Recover only the state that can change the next action:5152```text53Authoritative active task and current acceptance:54Current phase and next consequential decision:55Governing relation that should shape it:56New observation, correction, or distracting branch:57Why the branch may or may not affect acceptance:58Current candidate action:59Observation that would show the attention judgment is wrong:60```6162If the task has already completed, paused, been handed off, or been replaced by63a later Principal message, form the new task. Do not call that a return to the64old mainline.6566## Core method67681. **Form the current object.** Read the active human message and its relevant69 source state. Separate the task that is authoritative now from an older goal,70 an implementation plan, and the loudest local problem. Do not infer the71 object from a preferred Principle or slogan.722. **State the execution anchor.** Compress only the active goal, acceptance,73 authority/source boundary, current phase, governing relation, and retained74 obligations. This projection is replaceable and may be rebuilt from sources;75 it is not a second task record.763. **Classify the disturbance.** Choose one:77 - `continue`: the current action still advances the anchor;78 - `retain`: the branch blocks acceptance, invalidates a load-bearing79 assumption, or changes the governing relation, so it belongs in the active80 line for now;81 - `return`: the branch is settled, non-blocking, or evidence-only, so restore82 the next anchor action;83 - `switch`: the Principal completed, paused, handed off, or replaced the84 active task, so reconstruct a new anchor;85 - `ask`: authority or meaning is genuinely ambiguous and different answers86 would materially change the transition.874. **Choose the smallest control.** Take no control when attention is already88 correct. Use a compact cue when the anchor is valid but buried. Use a reset89 when a correction or evidence rejects an assumption: replace the obsolete90 attention unit with the new invariant instead of appending another reminder.91 Re-form the anchor on a true task switch. Keep a load-bearing branch active92 only until its named return condition.935. **Rebind an existing candidate action—or hand off.** When one candidate94 action already exists, verify that it changes acceptance, resolves the95 retained relation, or obtains evidence that decides between them. When the96 governing relation is restored but the next practice remains undecided,97 return the reconstructed anchor and observations to `practice-cycle`; do not98 select the practice here. Externalize secondary obligations rather than99 recursively following every new defect.1006. **Observe the transition.** Check the first action after a boundary, hard101 constraints, irrelevant branch depth, return latency, and whole-task102 acceptance. Vocabulary, confidence, role declaration, or reminder103 reproduction do not prove correct attention.1047. **Cultivate only from recurrence.** When the same failure repeats, inspect105 only the matching optional reference from the dispatch above. Preserve106 hypotheses and negative results; do not silently promote them into the core107 method.108109## Compact result110111```text112Execution anchor:113Disturbance: continue | retain | return | switch | ask114Reason it changes or does not change acceptance:115Control: none | cue | reset | reform | clarify116Rebound candidate action or handoff:117Retained obligation and return/reopen signal:118Evidence to observe:119```120121Do not emit this packet merely to narrate ordinary progress. Use it when it122changes the next action, restores a lost mainline, or creates reconstructable123evidence for an attention treatment.124125## Boundaries126127- Do not claim that model weights changed, neural activity persisted, or128 Transformer attention decayed from prompt behavior alone.129- Do not repeat a full system prompt merely because a task is long. Selective130 reactivation is a treatment to test, not a ritual.131- Do not let a catchphrase, character, plan, summary, or status field outrank132 the Principal message and authoritative sources it projects.133- When a delegated task needs owner/status/dependency visibility, use the134 existing coordination projection owned by the development method; this Skill135 restores attention to the governing relation but does not become the project136 plan or delegation tracker.137- Do not force every task through an orientation ceremony. Additional138 reasoning, latency, and context are costs and possible confounders.139- Do not use a return-to-mainline cue after a genuine task switch.140- Do not route through Workbench, Work Cell, or a vendor hook unless their141 separately owned persistent state or runtime capability is actually needed.142143## Completion standard144145Attention is restored when the current task and governing relation are source146linked, the disturbance has a justified disposition, the next action advances147acceptance or resolves a load-bearing branch, obsolete anchors no longer govern148the task, and any claimed treatment effect has matched behavioral evidence.