lidessen Writing Profile — Writer-BTI Assessment
Principle expression
Primary: P05 Supporting: P09, P12
A psychometric-style skill that builds a 7-dimension profile of the user's writing taste and preferences. The output is both a shareable type label (e.g. ENTP-R · 杂文家) and a continuous vector that downstream writing skills consume to match the user's voice.
Designed as a plan → run → finalize state machine with independent, resumable test units — each dimension gets its own methodology file and session file, loaded only when that dimension is being tested. This keeps context scoped so an 84-question assessment doesn't blow the window.
Why this exists
Generic AI writing has "AI 味" — stacked hedges, three-part parallels, metaphor decoration, balanced non-committal endings. Those aren't inherently wrong; they're wrong for this person if this person writes punchy committed prose. To strip AI味, the AI needs to know what "this person's voice" actually is — not as self-report ("I like clear writing"), but as a measured preference vector inferred from the user's reactions to real literature across genres.
The profile is genre-agnostic. A writer's core taste — rhythm, density, irony tolerance, classical-vernacular balance — is stable across technical articles, blogs, and diaries. Genre-specific knobs (formality, pronoun density) are adjusted by each downstream writing skill; the baseline comes from here.
Commands
围绕 3 件事组织：做测试、看结果、用结果。
主命令：
| Argument | Dispatch target | 用途 |
|---|---|---|
| (无参数) | commands/dispatch.md |
智能分发：首次→plan→W1→…→finalize→显示画像；中途→接着跑；完成→显示画像。最常用的入口 |
show |
commands/show.md |
展示 + 解读：测试完成后看结果的地方。不只 dump 坐标——读出画像在表达什么、和哪些作家近/远、写作中会自然偏向什么 |
retest |
commands/retest.md |
重做。无参 = 全部重测（二次确认）；retest W3 或直接 W3 = 单维度重测 |
W1 – W7 |
references/phases/run-unit.md |
retest W<N> 的快捷形式，也用于首次测 / 恢复进行中的单维度 |
review <path> |
commands/review.md |
用画像审查/改进一篇文档：读目标文档，询问体裁和目的，按坐标 + 机械反 AI 清单给出修改建议 |
内部阶段方法论（不是命令，dispatch/retest 按需加载）：
references/phases/plan.md— meta-intake + 生成 state.md，首次由 dispatch 调用references/phases/finalize.md— 合成 profile.md，所有单元完成后自动触发（或 retest 后重算）
type 码分享由 show 在输出末尾给出一行可复制的 ENTP-R · 杂文家 (王小波 × 鲁迅杂文)，不再单独走命令。想彻底清掉画像数据可以直接 rm -rf ~/.claude/writing-profile/。
典型使用路径
首次建画像：一路 /writing-profile 直到出画像
/writing-profile # 启动：plan → 跑 W1
/writing-profile # 接着：跑 W2
...
/writing-profile # W7 完 → 自动 finalize → 显示画像
看结果与解读：/writing-profile show
重测单维度：/writing-profile W3（或 /writing-profile retest W3）
全部重测：/writing-profile retest
用画像审文档：/writing-profile review drafts/article.md
The 7 dimensions — organized in 3 construct layers
Writer's voice = stable preferences stacked across three distinct layers. Each layer measures a different kind of thing; this framing (see references/psychometric-foundations.md for theory) is what prevents cross-layer confusion in the question design.
L1 认知启动 (Cognitive operation — 最稳定)
How the mind moves during writing: where attention lands, how decisions get made.
| Code | Name | Ends | Heritage |
|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | Sensing ↔ iNtuition | S / N | MBTI S/N (closest to original meaning, restricted to writing cognition) |
| W2 | Thinking ↔ Feeling | T / F | MBTI T/F (same) |
L2 文本姿态 (Textual stance — 中等稳定)
How the finished text relates to the reader: direction of address, degree of closure.
| Code | Name | Ends | Heritage |
|---|---|---|---|
| W3 | Extraversion ↔ Introversion | E / I | MBTI E/I letter, construct redefined: 发言姿态朝外/朝内 (reader-addressed vs self-addressed), not social energy |
| W4 | Judging ↔ Perceiving | J / P | MBTI J/P letter, construct redefined: 文本收束度 (closed/open structure), not lifestyle |
L3 审美偏好 (Aesthetic preference — 需要暴露前提)
Learned taste for what's read and written. Requires baseline exposure to measure.
| Code | Name | Ends | Heritage |
|---|---|---|---|
| W5 | 致密 ↔ 疏朗 (Density) | D / L | Writing-specific |
| W6 | 严肃 ↔ 反讽 (Grave ↔ Humor) | G / H | Writing-specific |
| W7 | 文言 ↔ 白话 (Classical ↔ Vernacular) | C / V | Chinese-specific · conditional dimension (see below) |
W7 is a conditional dimension: 审美偏好只能在"已有暴露"前提下测得。若用户对古典文学暴露度不足，W7 记为 null（不可测），副字计算退化。详见 references/dimensions/W7-classical-vernacular.md。
Each dimension has a dedicated methodology file under references/dimensions/. The agent reads only the active dimension's file when running that unit.
W5+W6+W7 combine into a single enumerated "副字" (one of A/C/W/R/Z/M/D/H) for the type label. See references/type-archetypes.md. When W7 is null, the副字 falls back to defaulting on the vernacular side (less classical-education-biased), and the profile marks C_V: null so downstream skills know not to push classical register.
⚠️ MBTI 字母是重诠释别名，不是 MBTI 人格测量
W1-W4 借用 S/N/T/F/E/I/J/P 是因为这 4 维在写作域的极性与 MBTI 原构念同构，保留字母便于记忆与分享。但构念已重定义：
- E/I：发言姿态（朝外/朝内），不是社交能量来源
- J/P：文本收束度（封闭/开放），不是生活方式
- S/N、T/F：最接近 MBTI 原义，但只取"写作时的认知启动"部分，不推及人格整体
若你是 MBTI 爱好者，这里的结果不能直接套用你的人格测量结果——两个量表测的不是同一个东西。见 references/psychometric-foundations.md 的"三层构念"论证。
Type label format
ENTP-R · 杂文家
- First 4 letters: standard MBTI code from W1-W4
- Single letter after dash: encodes W5/W6/W7 combination
- After
·: a recognizable Chinese style category (not an invented label)
| 副字 | 中文类别 | 维度组合 |
|---|---|---|
| A | 学院派 | 致密-严肃-文言 |
| C | 思辨派 | 致密-严肃-白话 |
| W | 才子派 | 致密-反讽-文言 |
| R | 杂文家 | 致密-反讽-白话 |
| Z | 抒情派 | 疏朗-严肃-文言 |
| M | 平实派 | 疏朗-严肃-白话 |
| D | 小品派 | 疏朗-反讽-文言 |
| H | 段子派 | 疏朗-反讽-白话 |
Type labels are shareable summaries of the underlying vector, not identity claims. Two writers with slightly different vectors may share a label; the agent always consumes the vector, not the label.
Methodology principles
Inherited from MBTI (the defensible parts):
- Forced-choice between equally-valid alternatives — eliminates "都还行" responses
- Multi-item per dimension (target ≥ 10 items) for reliability
- Reverse-keyed items (~30% of items per dimension) to catch careless answering
- Dimensional structure (7 axes, not one global score)
Rejected from MBTI (pop-psych parts):
- Type fatalism ("you are forever INTJ")
- Function stacking (Ni-Te-Fi-Se)
- Strict dichotomization — we keep continuous scores internally; labels are only summaries
Added from Big Five / IRT:
- Continuous scores with confidence bands (not just binary picks)
- "Middle type" allowed when |score| ≤ 2 — the user is genuinely flexible on that axis
Agent behavior during run:
- Never use a fixed question bank. Generate excerpts and questions on the fly, following strategy in
references/excerpt-strategy.mdand the active dimension's methodology file. - Use real authors, real texts. Excerpts must be actual passages, not AI-confected "in the style of X." Cite attribution only after the user answers, to prevent prestige bias.
- Keep one dimension active per session. When running W1, don't load W2-W7 methodology files. This is how context stays scoped for 80+ questions.
- Record every answer verbatim in the unit file. The session file is the source of truth; the agent's working memory is volatile.
- Stop a dimension early if confidence is high before the question cap. Sliding scale (see
references/signal-interpretation.md).
See also:
references/psychometric-foundations.md— full theory of what we inherit/reject and whyreferences/adaptive-branching.md— when to drill, skip, or stopreferences/signal-interpretation.md— how to score answers
File layout
skills/writing-profile/ ← methodology (read-only)
SKILL.md ← this file
commands/
dispatch.md, show.md, retest.md, review.md # user-facing
references/
psychometric-foundations.md
type-archetypes.md
excerpt-strategy.md
signal-interpretation.md
adaptive-branching.md
genre-adaptation.md # how downstream writing skills consume the profile
phases/
plan.md, run-unit.md, finalize.md # meta-intake / 单维度测试 / profile 合成 (按需加载)
dimensions/
W1-sensing-intuition.md
W2-thinking-feeling.md
W3-extraversion-introversion.md
W4-judging-perceiving.md
W5-density.md
W6-solemnity-irony.md
W7-classical-vernacular.md
assets/
state-template.md, unit-template.md, profile-template.md
~/.claude/writing-profile/ ← user state (written by skill)
state.md ← index + meta-intake + progress
units/ ← one file per dimension session
W1.md, W2.md, ...
profile.md ← final synthesized profile (consumer artifact)
Consumer contract
Downstream writing skills read ~/.claude/writing-profile/profile.md. The file's top YAML block (## 坐标) is the stable machine-readable contract; the rest is human-facing explanation.
How a genre skill adapts this baseline to its own genre — the clamp/shift/amplify framework, genre-specific extras, two-pass application, and fallback contract — is specified in references/genre-adaptation.md. Skill authors building new writing genres should read it before integrating.
# Example contract block from profile.md
S_N: +7 # -10 to +10, positive = N
T_F: -2
E_I: +5
J_P: +6
D_L: -4 # W5: positive = Dense (致密), negative = Light (疏朗)
G_H: -8 # W6: positive = Grave (严肃), negative = Humor (反讽)
C_V: -3 # W7: positive = Classical (文言), negative = Vernacular (白话)
type: ENTP-R
confidence:
S_N: high
T_F: medium
...
The profile file also contains a "机械反 AI 清单" — concrete banned phrases and patterns derived from the user's axes, to be executed during the revision phase of any writing task.
Fallback when no profile exists
If a downstream writing skill activates and no profile exists at ~/.claude/writing-profile/profile.md, suggest (don't force) that the user run /writing-profile to calibrate. Writing should proceed with generic defaults if they decline — a profile improves output but isn't a hard prerequisite.