CONTENT-WRITING SuperSkill
Триггеры: "контент", "статья", "гуманизация", "человеческий стиль", "AI writing", "текст", "документация" Атомов: 38
WHEN TO USE
- Writing/editing text for humans → apply humanization rules
- AI-generated text review → run anti-AI checklist
- Product descriptions, landing copy → use templates
- Any output that feels "too clean" → add soul
- Documentation → keep factual, skip humanization
KEY ACTIONS
Step 1: Write the content
Draft normally, focusing on substance and accuracy.
Step 2: Anti-AI pass (remove these patterns)
Kill list -- words to eliminate:
delve, crucial, pivotal, landscape, tapestry, multifaceted, stands as a testament, underscores the importance, indelible mark, setting the stage, evolving landscape, it's important to note, it's worth noting
Kill list -- structures to eliminate:
- "It's not just X; it's Y and Z" (negative parallelism)
- "Moreover, furthermore, additionally, consequently" (excessive conjunctives)
- Em dash clusters (max 1 per paragraph)
- "-ing" analyses: "highlighting the importance of..., ensuring that..."
- Inflated significance: "marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of..."
Step 3: Add soul
| Technique | Example |
|---|---|
| Have opinions | "I keep coming back to this" not neutral listing |
| Use "I" | "Here's what catches me..." |
| Mixed feelings | "Impressive, but also a little unsettling" |
| Be specific | Not "concerning" but "there's something uneasy about agents running at 3am" |
| Vary rhythm | Short sentence. Then a longer one that takes its time. Mix. |
| Let mess in | Tangents, asides, half-formed thoughts = human |
Step 4: Final check
Run the checklist below. If anything fails, fix and re-check.
TEMPLATES
Before/After
BAD (clean but soulless):
"Our cutting-edge platform leverages state-of-the-art AI to deliver
transformative solutions that empower businesses."
GOOD (has a pulse):
"We automate the boring stuff with AI so your team works on what
actually moves the needle. Set up in an hour, pays for itself in a week."
Product Description Structure
Line 1: What it does (plain language, no buzzwords)
Line 2: Who it's for
Line 3: Key differentiator (why this, not alternatives)
Line 4: Proof point (number, testimonial, or comparison)
Redline Template (for editing others' text)
[ORIGINAL]: "The innovative solution paradigm-shifts enterprise workflows"
[ISSUE]: Buzzword soup, no concrete meaning
[REWRITE]: "Cuts invoice processing from 3 days to 4 hours"
[WHY]: Specific result > vague claim
CHECKLIST
- No AI vocabulary (delve, crucial, tapestry, multifaceted...)
- No inflated significance (pivotal moment, indelible mark...)
- No "not just X; it's Y" constructions
- Em dash max 1 per paragraph
- Varied sentence lengths
- Author has opinion/position (not neutral report)
- Specific > general (numbers, names, examples)
- Final anti-AI pass completed
ANTI-PATTERNS
- Over-humanizing technical docs -- documentation should be clear, not "soulful"
- Replacing all structure with stream-of-consciousness -- structure is fine, sterile language is the problem
- Adding fake personal anecdotes -- better to have no story than a fabricated one
- Using the same humanization tricks every time -- "I keep thinking about..." gets stale too