To Prd

This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces a PRD as a local markdown file. Do NOT interview the user — just synthesize what you already know. (If you want to resolve open decisions first, that's /grill-me's job — run it before this.)

Process

1. Load project context (silently): .docs/seed.md for orientation, .docs/tech-stack.md for constraints, .docs/design-system.md for UI work, and a few nearby files of the same kind. Use the project's own vocabulary throughout the PRD. When docs and code conflict, trust the code.

2. Sketch out the seams at which you're going to test the feature. Existing seams should be preferred to new ones. Use the highest seam possible. If new seams are needed, propose them at the highest point you can.

Check with the user that these seams match their expectations.

3. Write the PRD using the template below and save it to .docs/prds/<slug>.md (kebab-case slug from the feature name; create the .docs/prds/ folder if it doesn't exist). Tell the user the path. To turn it into actionable work, run /to-issues next.

Problem Statement

The problem that the user is facing, from the user's perspective.

Solution

The solution to the problem, from the user's perspective.

User Stories

A LONG, numbered list of user stories. Each user story should be in the format of:

1. As an , I want a , so that

This list of user stories should be extremely extensive and cover all aspects of the feature.

Implementation Decisions

A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:

• The modules that will be built/modified
• The interfaces of those modules that will be modified
• Technical clarifications from the developer
• Architectural decisions
• Schema changes
• API contracts
• Specific interactions

Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.

Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it within the relevant decision and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.

Testing Decisions

A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:

• A description of what makes a good test (only test external behavior, not implementation details)
• Which modules will be tested
• Prior art for the tests (i.e. similar types of tests in the codebase)

Out of Scope

A description of the things that are out of scope for this PRD.

Further Notes

Any further notes about the feature.