Adversarial Quality Gate

Decide whether an article deserves publication through hard checks and skeptical comparison.

lionelndong Updated 0 repo stars

File contents

Adversarial Quality Gate

Mechanical checks

Assess depth against the Beat Spec, consensus coverage, AI-tell patterns, evidence, and structure. Score is diagnostic only.

Editorial verdict

Review the article beside the leading result and strongest plausible alternative through three lenses: substance/competitiveness, voice/readability, and reader-intent satisfaction. Ask: which page would the reader clearly keep? A competitor win, a tie, or material uncertainty fails.

Pass conditions

  • score is at least 85;
  • no critical issue or failed hard gate;
  • product proof, author fit, citations, internal links, and visual proof pass;
  • no unsupported, deceptive, unsafe, or off-intent framing.

Failure handling

Return an exact punch list and restart stage. One targeted rewrite is allowed. After two failures at the same producing gate, quarantine rather than iterating indefinitely.

lionelndong/pleasur-seo-agent/tree/main/skills/08-adversarial-quality-gate commit e22dcab4a3

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add lionelndong/adversarial-quality-gate