Adaptive Experimentation Strategy
Use this skill to decide whether and how to use adaptive testing strategies
instead of fixed-horizon A/B tests. It covers sequential testing, multi-armed
bandits, Thompson sampling, contextual bandits, exploration/exploitation, and
the data and engineering readiness required to operate them.
Source Traceability
Primary source: Next-Level A/B Testing by Leemay Nassery. Guidance is
transformed and paraphrased from Chapter 7 on adaptive testing, sequential
testing, multi-armed bandits, Thompson sampling, contextual bandits, and
engineering requirements.
Related skills:
experiment-type-selection for choosing simpler experiment types first.
ml-experiment-evaluation for model and ranking evaluation paths.
experiment-verification-monitoring for operational health and alerting.
Reference Routing
| Need |
Read |
| Adaptive testing concepts |
references/core/knowledge.md |
| Readiness and strategy rules |
references/core/rules.md |
| Scenario examples |
references/core/examples.md |
| Step-by-step adaptive readiness plan |
workflows/evaluate-adaptive-strategy.md |
Workflow
- State the decision and why fixed-horizon A/B testing may not be enough.
- Decide whether the need is early stopping, reward maximization, or
personalization.
- Check data freshness, reward definition, dashboards, on-call ownership, and
rollback controls.
- Choose sequential testing, bandits, Thompson sampling, contextual bandits, or
a simpler alternative.
- Document exploration/exploitation tradeoffs and user/business risk.
- Define rollout, monitoring, and adoption requirements.
Output Format
# Adaptive Experimentation Recommendation
## Use Case
[What decision or allocation problem motivates adaptive testing.]
## Recommended Strategy
[Do not use adaptive testing | Sequential | Bandit | Thompson sampling | Contextual bandit]
## Readiness
| Requirement | Status | Gap |
|-------------|--------|-----|
## Tradeoffs
- Reward:
- Exploration cost:
- Data freshness:
- Operational risk:
## Rollout Plan
1. [Step]
2. [Step]
3. [Step]
Quality Bar
- Do not recommend adaptive testing just because it is advanced.
- Do not use bandits when the real need is a clean causal estimate.
- Do not use contextual bandits without reliable context features and reward
measurement.
- Do not ignore production requirements: stale data, bad allocation, and alert
ownership can break adaptive systems.
1---2name: adaptive-experimentation-strategy3description: Plan adaptive experimentation strategies beyond fixed-horizon A/B tests. Use when evaluating sequential testing, early stopping, multi-armed bandits, Thompson sampling, contextual bandits, dynamic traffic allocation, exploration/exploitation tradeoffs, or readiness for adaptive testing infrastructure.4license: MIT5compatibility: Codex, Claude Code, and other Agent Skills-compatible clients.6metadata:7 version: "0.1.0"8 displayName: Adaptive Experimentation Strategy9 category: Product Management10 tags: practical-ab-testing,next-level-ab-testing,ab-testing,experimentation,adaptive-testing11---1213# Adaptive Experimentation Strategy1415Use this skill to decide whether and how to use adaptive testing strategies16instead of fixed-horizon A/B tests. It covers sequential testing, multi-armed17bandits, Thompson sampling, contextual bandits, exploration/exploitation, and18the data and engineering readiness required to operate them.1920## Source Traceability2122Primary source: *Next-Level A/B Testing* by Leemay Nassery. Guidance is23transformed and paraphrased from Chapter 7 on adaptive testing, sequential24testing, multi-armed bandits, Thompson sampling, contextual bandits, and25engineering requirements.2627Related skills:2829- `experiment-type-selection` for choosing simpler experiment types first.30- `ml-experiment-evaluation` for model and ranking evaluation paths.31- `experiment-verification-monitoring` for operational health and alerting.3233## Reference Routing3435| Need | Read |36|------|------|37| Adaptive testing concepts | `references/core/knowledge.md` |38| Readiness and strategy rules | `references/core/rules.md` |39| Scenario examples | `references/core/examples.md` |40| Step-by-step adaptive readiness plan | `workflows/evaluate-adaptive-strategy.md` |4142## Workflow43441. State the decision and why fixed-horizon A/B testing may not be enough.452. Decide whether the need is early stopping, reward maximization, or46 personalization.473. Check data freshness, reward definition, dashboards, on-call ownership, and48 rollback controls.494. Choose sequential testing, bandits, Thompson sampling, contextual bandits, or50 a simpler alternative.515. Document exploration/exploitation tradeoffs and user/business risk.526. Define rollout, monitoring, and adoption requirements.5354## Output Format5556```markdown57# Adaptive Experimentation Recommendation5859## Use Case60[What decision or allocation problem motivates adaptive testing.]6162## Recommended Strategy63[Do not use adaptive testing | Sequential | Bandit | Thompson sampling | Contextual bandit]6465## Readiness66| Requirement | Status | Gap |67|-------------|--------|-----|6869## Tradeoffs70- Reward:71- Exploration cost:72- Data freshness:73- Operational risk:7475## Rollout Plan761. [Step]772. [Step]783. [Step]79```8081## Quality Bar8283- Do not recommend adaptive testing just because it is advanced.84- Do not use bandits when the real need is a clean causal estimate.85- Do not use contextual bandits without reliable context features and reward86 measurement.87- Do not ignore production requirements: stale data, bad allocation, and alert88 ownership can break adaptive systems.