lyndonkl Identify Kill List
Workflow
Per quarterly review:
- [ ] Step 1: Candidate sources:
- Sections classed "candidate-for-prune" in section-portfolio-assessment
- Goals unchanged 2 quarters in a row with no progression
- Agents in the team whose output the writer has not referenced in any decision this quarter
- Habits writer flagged in audience-notes as guilt-producing but unused
- [ ] Step 2: Filter to max 4 items (ruthless)
- [ ] Step 3: Order by ease: easiest kills first
- [ ] Step 4: Each item: one-sentence why
Rules
- Max 4 items. More than 4 and the writer won't stop any of them.
- First kill should be something the writer will actually do within a week.
- Last kill can be harder (a habit, a section) — but still named.
Worked example
- Drop the daily trend-scout digest. You haven't acted on any item from it in 12 weeks.
- Kill the "book reviews" section. One post in two quarters; it's guilt scaffolding, not a section.
- Stop writing the weekly "state of the publication" note to yourself. The Growth Analyst's report is doing that job now.
- Remove the "get on Hacker News front page" goal. It's not a goal, it's an outcome, and chasing it warps the writing.
Guardrails
- Never exceed 4 items.
- Order by ease. First item should be actionable this week.
- One-sentence rationale each. No paragraphs.
- Pull from multiple candidate sources — don't have all 4 be sections.
- Never suggest killing something the writer explicitly committed to this quarter.
- Previous-quarter kills that the writer didn't execute can be re-named — but only once, not indefinitely.