lyndonkl Voice Check
Table of Contents
Related skills: Called by the Editor after structural-review. Runs alongside hedge-detector, slop-detector, citation-form-check. Each skill owns a specific band of voice issues; this one handles explicit don't-list phrase matches.
Workflow
Voice check draft D:
- [ ] Step 1: Load voice-profile.md (global) + voices/{section}.md (if applicable)
- [ ] Step 2: Extract the don't-list as a regex bank
- [ ] Step 3: Scan draft; match each regex with word boundaries
- [ ] Step 4: For each match: record {line, quoted phrase, violation, voice-profile citation, 2 rewrite options}
- [ ] Step 5: Emit phrase-flags table
Don't-list regex bank
From voice-profile.md §10 (Voice don'ts). Word-boundary enforced.
| Violation | Regex | Rewrite hint |
|---|---|---|
delve |
`\bdelve(s | d |
unpack |
`\bunpack(s | ed |
dive into |
\bdive\s+into\b |
replace with specific verb |
let's explore |
`\blet'?s\s+(explore | dive)` |
at the end of the day |
\bat\s+the\s+end\s+of\s+the\s+day\b |
delete clause |
game-changer |
\bgame[-\s]?changer\b |
name the specific change |
paradigm shift |
\bparadigm\s+shift\b |
name the shift explicitly |
under the hood |
\bunder\s+the\s+hood\b |
replace with "mechanically" or delete |
in today's fast-paced world |
in\s+today'?s\s+(fast[-\s]?paced\s+)?world |
delete; open with a dated concrete fact |
AI is transforming |
(?i)AI\s+is\s+transforming |
delete generic framing; open with confession |
| emoji | [\u{1F300}-\u{1FAFF}\u{2600}-\u{27BF}] |
delete |
| exclamation | ! (in body, not quotes) |
convert to period |
I think (as hedge) |
\bI\s+think\b (when followed by a claim, not a question) |
commit OR specific hedge |
clearly / obviously / simply (as persuasion) |
`\b(clearly | obviously |
| custom CTA | `subscribe\b.*(resonated | more |
Section overlays can add or override entries. If voices/kalshi-log.md bans "generalizing to other sports", add that rule.
Worked example
Draft excerpt:
In today's rapidly evolving AI landscape, let's unpack why RAG beats fine-tuning. At the end of the day, RAG is a game-changer. Let's dive into the details!
Flags (all tier-1):
| loc | quote | violation | citation | rewrites |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 S1 | "In today's rapidly evolving AI landscape" | generic opener | voice-profile §10 don't #2 | (a) delete; (b) replace with a dated concrete fact |
| P1 S1 | "let's unpack" | don't-list | §10 don't #1 | (a) "Here is the mechanism" (b) delete |
| P1 S2 | "At the end of the day" | don't-list | §10 don't #1 | (a) delete clause |
| P1 S2 | "game-changer" | don't-list | §10 don't #1 | (a) "it cuts token budget by 40% on our traces" (b) "it avoids a retrain" |
| P1 S3 | "Let's dive into" | don't-list | §10 don't #1 | (a) "Here is what actually happens" (b) delete |
| P1 S3 | "!" (exclamation) | don't-list | §10 don't #8 | (a) period |
Six tier-1 flags in three sentences → triggers Editor must-not #13 (≥3 tier-1 voice violations = no-go).
Guardrails
- Every flag must cite a voice-profile line. No flag without citation.
- Regex must have word boundaries; avoid false positives (e.g., "undelete" shouldn't match
delve). - Section overlays extend but never override global don'ts — an overlay cannot allow a global don't.
- Exclamation-point rule excludes quoted dialogue and code fences.
- "I think" is flagged only when followed by a claim. "I think so, but I'm not sure" is a sentence of quiet agreement, not a hedge on a claim.
- Max 2 rewrite options per flag.
Quick reference
- Input: draft + voice-profile + optional overlay.
- Output: phrase-flags table in the voice pass.
- Complements
hedge-detector(hedging) andslop-detector(structural voice).