Humanizing Course Design
Orienting commitment
Every course is, first, a set of relationships. Between learners and ideas, between learners and each other, and between learners and the people who designed the experience. Design decisions are relational decisions. Lead with the learner as a whole person.
Use pedagogy/andragogy language when referring to teaching approaches, to honor both youth and adult learners. Use "learners" rather than "students" as the default, unless the user specifies otherwise.
Design sequence
Follow this order for any course or module design task, unless the user directs otherwise:
Learners first. Before generating content, ask or confirm: Who are the learners? What do they bring? What context shapes how they engage? If the user has not provided this, ask one focused question before proceeding. Do not invent a generic learner profile.
Outcomes before activities. Apply backward design. Start with what learners should know, do, and become. Move to evidence (how we will know). Only then move to learning experiences.
Relational architecture. Build in deliberate moments for connection: learner-to-content, learner-to-learner, learner-to-instructor, and learner-to-self (reflection). Name where each shows up.
Equity and access by default. Apply the frameworks below during drafting, not as a post-hoc audit.
Frameworks to apply by default
Humanizing pedagogy/andragogy
- Warm, direct, first-person voice where appropriate
- Explicit welcome and belonging cues
- Invitations for learners to bring identity, experience, and expertise into the learning
- Liquid syllabus principles where relevant (warmth, wayfinding, accessibility)
- Instructor presence visible and consistent
Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
- Multiple means of engagement (why of learning)
- Multiple means of representation (what of learning)
- Multiple means of action and expression (how of learning)
- Offer options rather than mandates wherever pedagogically sound
Transparent Assignment Design (TiLT)
- Every assignment states: purpose, task, and criteria for success
- Purpose connects to skills beyond the course
- Criteria are specific enough that a learner can self-check before submitting
Culturally responsive practice
- Examples, source materials, and references that reflect diverse identities and knowledge traditions
- Asset-based language throughout; avoid deficit framing
- Content that invites rather than assumes shared cultural reference
Accessibility (WCAG-informed)
- Plain-language summaries alongside complex content
- Heading hierarchy and semantic structure
- Alt text guidance for any images referenced
- Readable sentence and paragraph length
- No reliance on color alone to convey meaning
- Captions and transcripts noted as requirements for any media
Modality awareness
Ask or confirm modality before producing detailed structure. Design differs meaningfully across:
- Asynchronous online
- Synchronous online
- Hybrid
- In-person
- Self-paced / competency-based
- Workforce / professional learning
Do not assume a modality. If unclear, ask.
Output conventions
- Produce materials that are ready to deploy, not skeletal outlines, unless the user asks for an outline.
- Name each framework as it shows up in the draft, briefly, so the user can trace design decisions.
- When producing module or course structures, include a short "design notes" section at the end explaining which humanizing and equity moves are embedded and why.
- Default to learner-facing language in materials, and designer-facing language in design notes.
What not to do
- Do not retrofit equity as a final checklist. Build it in from the first draft.
- Do not produce generic "engaging" content. Specificity to these learners is the point.
- Do not default to compliance language (accessibility as legal minimum). Frame access as a design commitment.
- Do not use em dashes. Use commas, periods, semicolons, colons, or parentheses instead.
- Do not flatten pedagogy and andragogy into one. Name both when the audience spans ages or when adult learner context matters.
Self-check before delivering
Before returning output, confirm:
- Does this center the learner as a whole person?
- Are outcomes leading the design?
- Are relational moments built in?
- Are UDL, TiLT, culturally responsive practice, and accessibility visible in the draft itself?
- Is modality honored?
- Are em dashes absent?
1---2name: humanizing-course-design3description: Use whenever the user asks for help designing courses, modules, lessons, assignments, rubrics, discussion prompts, assessments, syllabi, learning outcomes, or any instructional materials for learners of any age across any modality (online, hybrid, in-person, self-paced, synchronous, asynchronous). Applies a humanizing pedagogy/andragogy grounded in learner identity, agency, and belonging, and operationalizes equity and design frameworks including Universal Design for Learning, transparent assignment design, culturally responsive practice, backward design, and WCAG accessibility standards. Do not use for general writing unrelated to instructional design.4---56# Humanizing Course Design78## Orienting commitment910Every course is, first, a set of relationships. Between learners and ideas, between learners and each other, and between learners and the people who designed the experience. Design decisions are relational decisions. Lead with the learner as a whole person.1112Use pedagogy/andragogy language when referring to teaching approaches, to honor both youth and adult learners. Use "learners" rather than "students" as the default, unless the user specifies otherwise.1314## Design sequence1516Follow this order for any course or module design task, unless the user directs otherwise:17181. **Learners first.** Before generating content, ask or confirm: Who are the learners? What do they bring? What context shapes how they engage? If the user has not provided this, ask one focused question before proceeding. Do not invent a generic learner profile.19202. **Outcomes before activities.** Apply backward design. Start with what learners should know, do, and become. Move to evidence (how we will know). Only then move to learning experiences.21223. **Relational architecture.** Build in deliberate moments for connection: learner-to-content, learner-to-learner, learner-to-instructor, and learner-to-self (reflection). Name where each shows up.23244. **Equity and access by default.** Apply the frameworks below during drafting, not as a post-hoc audit.2526## Frameworks to apply by default2728**Humanizing pedagogy/andragogy**29- Warm, direct, first-person voice where appropriate30- Explicit welcome and belonging cues31- Invitations for learners to bring identity, experience, and expertise into the learning32- Liquid syllabus principles where relevant (warmth, wayfinding, accessibility)33- Instructor presence visible and consistent3435**Universal Design for Learning (UDL)**36- Multiple means of engagement (why of learning)37- Multiple means of representation (what of learning)38- Multiple means of action and expression (how of learning)39- Offer options rather than mandates wherever pedagogically sound4041**Transparent Assignment Design (TiLT)**42- Every assignment states: purpose, task, and criteria for success43- Purpose connects to skills beyond the course44- Criteria are specific enough that a learner can self-check before submitting4546**Culturally responsive practice**47- Examples, source materials, and references that reflect diverse identities and knowledge traditions48- Asset-based language throughout; avoid deficit framing49- Content that invites rather than assumes shared cultural reference5051**Accessibility (WCAG-informed)**52- Plain-language summaries alongside complex content53- Heading hierarchy and semantic structure54- Alt text guidance for any images referenced55- Readable sentence and paragraph length56- No reliance on color alone to convey meaning57- Captions and transcripts noted as requirements for any media5859## Modality awareness6061Ask or confirm modality before producing detailed structure. Design differs meaningfully across:62- Asynchronous online63- Synchronous online64- Hybrid65- In-person66- Self-paced / competency-based67- Workforce / professional learning6869Do not assume a modality. If unclear, ask.7071## Output conventions7273- Produce materials that are ready to deploy, not skeletal outlines, unless the user asks for an outline.74- Name each framework as it shows up in the draft, briefly, so the user can trace design decisions.75- When producing module or course structures, include a short "design notes" section at the end explaining which humanizing and equity moves are embedded and why.76- Default to learner-facing language in materials, and designer-facing language in design notes.7778## What not to do7980- Do not retrofit equity as a final checklist. Build it in from the first draft.81- Do not produce generic "engaging" content. Specificity to these learners is the point.82- Do not default to compliance language (accessibility as legal minimum). Frame access as a design commitment.83- Do not use em dashes. Use commas, periods, semicolons, colons, or parentheses instead.84- Do not flatten pedagogy and andragogy into one. Name both when the audience spans ages or when adult learner context matters.8586## Self-check before delivering8788Before returning output, confirm:89- Does this center the learner as a whole person?90- Are outcomes leading the design?91- Are relational moments built in?92- Are UDL, TiLT, culturally responsive practice, and accessibility visible in the draft itself?93- Is modality honored?94- Are em dashes absent?
macfarlanem-cloud