Conditional Customer Success
A CONDITIONAL skill for products with recurring human relationships. This
skill must never be loaded for every product context. It loads only when
the product has accounts, renewals, QBRs, or a dedicated customer-success
team. When those conditions are absent — for internal tools, pure transactional
products, or public services without account-based engagement — this skill
declines and routes the caller away.
When to Load (Should-Trigger Examples)
| Example |
What makes it a match |
| B2B subscription product with named account managers |
Accounts, renewals, dedicated CS team |
| Enterprise SaaS with quarterly business reviews |
QBR cadence, account-tier engagement |
| Renewal-risk analysis needed for a contract portfolio |
Renewal evidence, churn-risk signals |
| Product with an assigned customer-success team managing health plans |
Success plans, health tracking |
| Account-expansion opportunity identified but adoption signals are mixed |
Expansion with relationship context |
| Customer feedback loop — insight surfaced, product change made, customer communication needed |
Closed-loop Voice of Customer |
When not to use
This skill must not be loaded for products without accounts, renewals,
QBRs, or a customer-success team. See the should-not-trigger examples below.
When NOT to Load (Should-Not-Trigger Examples)
This skill must not load when the product context lacks the required
preconditions. The skill must decline and route the caller away.
| Example |
Why it does not apply |
| Internal developer tool with no accounts, no renewals, no QBRs |
No recurring human relationship; no CS team |
| Pure transactional e-commerce product — one-time purchases, no account management |
No accounts, no renewals, no QBRs, no CS team |
| Public-service benefit-application portal — no account-tier engagement, no CS team |
No accounts (in the CS sense), no renewals, no QBRs |
| Consumer mobile game with subscription billing but no human CS relationship |
Subscription alone is insufficient; no human CS relationship |
| Open-source project with community support but no paid accounts |
No accounts, no renewals, no CS team |
| Internal analytics dashboard for a single team |
No recurring relationship outside the team; no CS team |
Decline rule: If none of the should-trigger conditions are present — that is,
the product has no accounts, no renewals, no QBRs, and no customer-success
team — this skill must decline with an applicability assessment that records
which preconditions were absent and routes the caller to the nearest
appropriate skill (product-analytics-and-measurement, product-adoption, or
product-lifecycle-learning).
Product/Relationship Models
This skill defines when customer-success practice applies and what adaptations
are needed for four distinct models. None assumes SaaS.
1. B2B Subscription
Applies fully. Accounts, renewals, QBRs, expansion tiers, and a dedicated
customer-success team are the canonical fit. All artifacts apply: success plans,
health/risk records, escalation paths, handoff protocols, and closed-loop
feedback.
2. Transactional (Non-Subscription)
Partial application — adapted. The product may have repeat customers and
account relationships without formal subscriptions. CS adaptations:
- Success plans focus on repeat-purchase patterns and re-order outcomes, not
subscription renewal dates.
- Health evidence uses purchase frequency, order-value trends, and account
engagement signals — not MRR or churn metrics.
- QBRs become periodic business reviews triggered by purchase milestones or
account tier, not calendar dates.
- Escalation triggers on declining purchase frequency or account dormancy.
3. Public Service
Minimal application — routing preferred. Public-service products often
have citizens or beneficiaries, not "accounts." CS applies only when there
is explicit account-based engagement (e.g., a case-management portal).
- Success plans become service-outcome plans, not commercial plans.
- Health evidence uses service-access equity, completion-rate gaps across
cohorts, and accessibility barriers — never commercial metrics.
- Escalation routes to program governance, not commercial leadership.
- Privacy boundaries are stricter: citizen data must not be repurposed.
See references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md.
When no account-based engagement exists, decline and route to
product-adoption (for service-adoption diagnostics) and
product-analytics-and-measurement (for service-outcome measurement).
4. Internal Product
Conditional — strong routing preference. Internal products may have
"internal customers" (other teams, business units), but CS applies only
when there is a recurring human relationship with structured engagement.
- Success plans become internal service-level agreements, not commercial plans.
- Health evidence uses internal adoption, workflow-completion, and
time-saved metrics — never revenue or MRR.
- QBRs become internal service reviews, structured around team outcomes.
- Escalation routes to internal governance, not commercial leadership.
When the internal product has no recurring human relationship (e.g., a
single-team analytics dashboard), decline and route to product-adoption
or product-lifecycle-learning.
Core Artifacts
Every artifact is a decision-support tool, never an automated decision.
1. Applicability Decision
Before applying any customer-success method, produce an applicability
assessment. If the product context lacks accounts, renewals, QBRs, or a CS
team, decline and route the caller away. Record which preconditions
were absent.
Template: templates/applicability-decision.md
2. Success Plan
A structured record of the customer's desired outcomes, aligned product
capabilities, measurable milestones, and assigned relationship owner.
Not a sales plan; not a support ticket; not a project plan. The success
plan is the living artifact that connects customer intent to product
evidence.
Template: templates/success-plan.md
3. Health / Risk Record
An evidence-based record — never an automated score. For each health
dimension, capture:
- The signal (observable evidence, not a proxy metric).
- The source (analytics, adoption, direct observation).
- The trend (direction and recency).
- The confidence (how reliable the evidence is).
- Conflicting signals (surface disagreement, not a forced consensus).
Template: templates/health-risk-record.md
4. Escalation Path
A defined path from signal to decision-maker, with explicit human-judgment
gates. Every escalation requires a human decision before action. The path
defines:
- The trigger signal and its threshold.
- The escalation owner (named role, not a system).
- The review cadence.
- The decision options (and who makes each).
- The fallback if no decision is reached.
Template: templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md
5. Handoff Protocols
Defined handoffs to product, support, and engineering teams with clear
ownership boundaries:
| Handoff |
Trigger |
Receiving Team |
Artifact |
| Feature request from customer evidence |
Validated pattern across ≥3 accounts |
Product |
Success-plan extract + health evidence |
| Support escalation |
Blocking issue with account impact |
Support |
Escalation record with account context |
| Technical defect with account risk |
Reproducible bug affecting ≥1 account |
Engineering |
Defect record + account-impact assessment |
| Churn risk requiring lifecycle action |
Sustained health decline, 2+ remediation attempts failed |
Product-lifecycle-learning |
Health/risk record + remediation history |
6. Closed-Loop Feedback Closure
The path from customer insight to product change to customer communication:
Customer Insight → Validate (pattern? isolated?) →
Product Decision (build / defer / decline) →
Implementation → Communication Back to Customer →
Close Loop (record evidence)
Every step is recorded. "Communication Back to Customer" is mandatory —
closing the loop means the customer knows what happened with their feedback.
See templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md.
Privacy and Human Judgment Boundaries
These boundaries are non-negotiable.
Customer Feedback Must Not Become Surveillance
- Feedback is collected with consent and a stated purpose.
- Usage is limited to the stated purpose.
- Aggregation is permitted for pattern detection; individual-level
behavior tracking beyond the stated purpose is not.
- Customer data shared across teams is scoped to the minimum necessary.
Health Scores Are Decision-Support, Not Automated Decisions
- A health signal is evidence; it never becomes an automated action
(no auto-churn, no auto-escalation without human review).
- Conflicting signals must be surfaced, not averaged into a single score.
- The health/risk record includes confidence and provenance for every signal.
Human Judgment Is Required for Escalation Decisions
- Every escalation trigger requires a human decision before any action.
- The escalation path defines who decides, on what evidence, with what
options.
- A "no decision" state has a defined fallback — escalate further, not
auto-act.
Privacy Boundaries Around Customer Data
- Customer-identifiable data is never embedded in templates shared outside
the CS team.
- Health evidence uses anonymized or aggregated signals when shared across
teams.
- Data retention and access are governed by the product's privacy policy,
not the CS practice.
See references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md for the full boundaries reference.
Routing and Related Skills
This skill routes to specialist skills rather than re-deriving their
methodology. All routing references use relative paths to existing
directories, or prose references for skills not yet landed.
Routes to (existing skills)
| Skill |
What it owns |
How this skill consumes it |
| ../product-analytics-and-measurement/SKILL.md |
Metric trees, tracking plans, instrumentation QA, measurement governance |
Provides health evidence and metric definitions for health/risk records |
| ../product-adoption/SKILL.md |
Onboarding, activation, behavior change, feature discovery, sustained use |
Provides adoption signals (activation, feature adoption, sustained use) as health dimensions |
| ../product-experimentation/SKILL.md |
Experiment design, readout, ship/no-ship decisions |
Consumed when CS evidence suggests an experiment (e.g., intervention test for at-risk accounts) |
| ../go-to-market/SKILL.md |
Acquisition campaigns, marketing conversion |
Does NOT own. CS consumes acquisition context only. |
| ../crm/SKILL.md |
HubSpot CRM operations — contact records, deal pipeline views, confirmed deal stage changes |
Provides account records and pipeline/health context for health/risk records and QBR preparation |
Routes to (prose references — skills not yet landed)
| Skill |
What it owns |
How this skill routes to it |
| product-lifecycle-learning |
Retirement communication plans, customer treatment during sunset, migration-support coordination, churn-pattern learning across the portfolio |
Escalates sustained health decline (2+ remediation attempts failed) for lifecycle action. Routes churn and sunset signals for portfolio-level learning. |
Does NOT own
- Statistical inference or experiment design — belongs to
data-scientist and product-experimentation.
- Product-analytics instrumentation — belongs to
product-analytics-and-measurement.
- Acquisition, marketing conversion, or campaign design — belongs to
go-to-market.
- Product roadmapping or portfolio prioritization — belongs to
product-roadmapping-and-portfolio.
- Customer support operations or ticket management — belongs to support-tooling skills.
- Contract negotiation, pricing, or legal terms — belongs to
go-to-market and legal-strategy skills.
File Map
| File |
Purpose |
Load when |
| references/discovery-brief.md |
Maps existing related content, ownership boundaries, and routing decisions |
First load — required context |
| references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md |
Full privacy and human-judgment boundaries, surveillance-risk guidance, consent framework |
Privacy or judgment question arises |
| templates/applicability-decision.md |
Structured applicability assessment — decline or proceed with evidence |
Customer-success method considered for any product |
| templates/success-plan.md |
Customer success plan with desired outcomes, milestones, evidence gates |
Building or reviewing a success plan |
| templates/health-risk-record.md |
Evidence-based health/risk record with signal, source, trend, confidence, and conflicting-signal tracking |
Health review, QBR prep, renewal-risk analysis |
| templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md |
Escalation path definition and closed-loop feedback closure record |
Escalation design or feedback-loop operation |
QBR and Engagement Cadence
Quarterly Business Review (QBR) Structure
A QBR is an evidence review, not a sales presentation. The structure:
- Success-plan review — progress against desired outcomes, milestone
achievement.
- Health evidence — each dimension, its signal, trend, and confidence.
Conflicting signals presented, not averaged.
- Adoption evidence — feature adoption, activation trends, sustained-use
patterns (from product-adoption evidence).
- Risk review — open risks, mitigation status, escalation history.
- Forward plan — next-period success-plan adjustments, expansion
opportunities (routed to go-to-market for commercial motion), and
risk-mitigation actions.
- Feedback loop status — open feedback items, product decisions made,
communication-back status.
Triggering QBRs Outside B2B Subscription
For non-subscription models, QBRs are triggered by events, not calendar dates:
| Model |
QBR Trigger |
| Transactional |
Purchase-milestone threshold, account-tier change, or 6-month dormancy |
| Public Service |
Service-review cycle, equity-gap detection, or accessibility-audit result |
| Internal Product |
Internal service-review cycle, team-reorg, or adoption decline |
Output Contract
- An applicability decision recorded before any CS method is applied.
- A success plan with desired outcomes, milestones, evidence gates, and
a named relationship owner.
- A health/risk record with evidence per dimension, not a score.
- An escalation path with explicit human-judgment gates.
- A closed-loop record tracing customer insight → product decision →
customer communication.
- Handoff records to product, support, or engineering with account
context and evidence.
1---2name: conditional-customer-success3description: Guide recurring human-relationship practices — success plans, health evidence, renewal and expansion signals, QBRs, handoffs, escalation, and closed-loop Voice of Customer. Do not use this skill for products without accounts, renewals, QBRs, or a customer-success team, including some internal tools, pure transactional products without recurring relationships, and public services without account-based engagement. Load only when the product context includes a recurring human relationship; decline or route away otherwise.4license: MIT5---67# Conditional Customer Success89A CONDITIONAL skill for products with recurring human relationships. This10skill must **never** be loaded for every product context. It loads only when11the product has accounts, renewals, QBRs, or a dedicated customer-success12team. When those conditions are absent — for internal tools, pure transactional13products, or public services without account-based engagement — this skill14declines and routes the caller away.1516## When to Load (Should-Trigger Examples)1718| Example | What makes it a match |19|---|---|20| B2B subscription product with named account managers | Accounts, renewals, dedicated CS team |21| Enterprise SaaS with quarterly business reviews | QBR cadence, account-tier engagement |22| Renewal-risk analysis needed for a contract portfolio | Renewal evidence, churn-risk signals |23| Product with an assigned customer-success team managing health plans | Success plans, health tracking |24| Account-expansion opportunity identified but adoption signals are mixed | Expansion with relationship context |25| Customer feedback loop — insight surfaced, product change made, customer communication needed | Closed-loop Voice of Customer |2627## When not to use2829This skill must not be loaded for products without accounts, renewals,30QBRs, or a customer-success team. See the should-not-trigger examples below.3132## When NOT to Load (Should-Not-Trigger Examples)3334This skill must **not** load when the product context lacks the required35preconditions. The skill must decline and route the caller away.3637| Example | Why it does not apply |38|---|---|39| Internal developer tool with no accounts, no renewals, no QBRs | No recurring human relationship; no CS team |40| Pure transactional e-commerce product — one-time purchases, no account management | No accounts, no renewals, no QBRs, no CS team |41| Public-service benefit-application portal — no account-tier engagement, no CS team | No accounts (in the CS sense), no renewals, no QBRs |42| Consumer mobile game with subscription billing but no human CS relationship | Subscription alone is insufficient; no human CS relationship |43| Open-source project with community support but no paid accounts | No accounts, no renewals, no CS team |44| Internal analytics dashboard for a single team | No recurring relationship outside the team; no CS team |4546**Decline rule**: If none of the should-trigger conditions are present — that is,47the product has no accounts, no renewals, no QBRs, and no customer-success48team — this skill must decline with an applicability assessment that records49which preconditions were absent and routes the caller to the nearest50appropriate skill (product-analytics-and-measurement, product-adoption, or51product-lifecycle-learning).5253## Product/Relationship Models5455This skill defines when customer-success practice applies and what adaptations56are needed for four distinct models. None assumes SaaS.5758### 1. B2B Subscription5960**Applies fully.** Accounts, renewals, QBRs, expansion tiers, and a dedicated61customer-success team are the canonical fit. All artifacts apply: success plans,62health/risk records, escalation paths, handoff protocols, and closed-loop63feedback.6465### 2. Transactional (Non-Subscription)6667**Partial application — adapted.** The product may have repeat customers and68account relationships without formal subscriptions. CS adaptations:6970- Success plans focus on repeat-purchase patterns and re-order outcomes, not71 subscription renewal dates.72- Health evidence uses purchase frequency, order-value trends, and account73 engagement signals — not MRR or churn metrics.74- QBRs become periodic business reviews triggered by purchase milestones or75 account tier, not calendar dates.76- Escalation triggers on declining purchase frequency or account dormancy.7778### 3. Public Service7980**Minimal application — routing preferred.** Public-service products often81have citizens or beneficiaries, not "accounts." CS applies only when there82is explicit account-based engagement (e.g., a case-management portal).8384- Success plans become service-outcome plans, not commercial plans.85- Health evidence uses service-access equity, completion-rate gaps across86 cohorts, and accessibility barriers — never commercial metrics.87- Escalation routes to program governance, not commercial leadership.88- Privacy boundaries are stricter: citizen data must not be repurposed.89 See [references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md](references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md).9091When no account-based engagement exists, **decline** and route to92product-adoption (for service-adoption diagnostics) and93product-analytics-and-measurement (for service-outcome measurement).9495### 4. Internal Product9697**Conditional — strong routing preference.** Internal products may have98"internal customers" (other teams, business units), but CS applies only99when there is a recurring human relationship with structured engagement.100101- Success plans become internal service-level agreements, not commercial plans.102- Health evidence uses internal adoption, workflow-completion, and103 time-saved metrics — never revenue or MRR.104- QBRs become internal service reviews, structured around team outcomes.105- Escalation routes to internal governance, not commercial leadership.106107When the internal product has no recurring human relationship (e.g., a108single-team analytics dashboard), **decline** and route to product-adoption109or product-lifecycle-learning.110111## Core Artifacts112113Every artifact is a decision-support tool, never an automated decision.114115### 1. Applicability Decision116117Before applying any customer-success method, produce an applicability118assessment. If the product context lacks accounts, renewals, QBRs, or a CS119team, **decline** and route the caller away. Record which preconditions120were absent.121122Template: [templates/applicability-decision.md](templates/applicability-decision.md)123124### 2. Success Plan125126A structured record of the customer's desired outcomes, aligned product127capabilities, measurable milestones, and assigned relationship owner.128Not a sales plan; not a support ticket; not a project plan. The success129plan is the living artifact that connects customer intent to product130evidence.131132Template: [templates/success-plan.md](templates/success-plan.md)133134### 3. Health / Risk Record135136An **evidence-based** record — never an automated score. For each health137dimension, capture:138139- The signal (observable evidence, not a proxy metric).140- The source (analytics, adoption, direct observation).141- The trend (direction and recency).142- The confidence (how reliable the evidence is).143- Conflicting signals (surface disagreement, not a forced consensus).144145Template: [templates/health-risk-record.md](templates/health-risk-record.md)146147### 4. Escalation Path148149A defined path from signal to decision-maker, with explicit human-judgment150gates. Every escalation requires a human decision before action. The path151defines:152153- The trigger signal and its threshold.154- The escalation owner (named role, not a system).155- The review cadence.156- The decision options (and who makes each).157- The fallback if no decision is reached.158159Template: [templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md](templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md)160161### 5. Handoff Protocols162163Defined handoffs to product, support, and engineering teams with clear164ownership boundaries:165166| Handoff | Trigger | Receiving Team | Artifact |167|---|---|---|---|168| Feature request from customer evidence | Validated pattern across ≥3 accounts | Product | Success-plan extract + health evidence |169| Support escalation | Blocking issue with account impact | Support | Escalation record with account context |170| Technical defect with account risk | Reproducible bug affecting ≥1 account | Engineering | Defect record + account-impact assessment |171| Churn risk requiring lifecycle action | Sustained health decline, 2+ remediation attempts failed | Product-lifecycle-learning | Health/risk record + remediation history |172173### 6. Closed-Loop Feedback Closure174175The path from customer insight to product change to customer communication:176177```178Customer Insight → Validate (pattern? isolated?) →179 Product Decision (build / defer / decline) →180 Implementation → Communication Back to Customer →181 Close Loop (record evidence)182```183184Every step is recorded. "Communication Back to Customer" is mandatory —185closing the loop means the customer knows what happened with their feedback.186See [templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md](templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md).187188## Privacy and Human Judgment Boundaries189190These boundaries are non-negotiable.191192### Customer Feedback Must Not Become Surveillance193194- Feedback is collected with consent and a stated purpose.195- Usage is limited to the stated purpose.196- Aggregation is permitted for pattern detection; individual-level197 behavior tracking beyond the stated purpose is not.198- Customer data shared across teams is scoped to the minimum necessary.199200### Health Scores Are Decision-Support, Not Automated Decisions201202- A health signal is evidence; it never becomes an automated action203 (no auto-churn, no auto-escalation without human review).204- Conflicting signals must be surfaced, not averaged into a single score.205- The health/risk record includes confidence and provenance for every signal.206207### Human Judgment Is Required for Escalation Decisions208209- Every escalation trigger requires a human decision before any action.210- The escalation path defines who decides, on what evidence, with what211 options.212- A "no decision" state has a defined fallback — escalate further, not213 auto-act.214215### Privacy Boundaries Around Customer Data216217- Customer-identifiable data is never embedded in templates shared outside218 the CS team.219- Health evidence uses anonymized or aggregated signals when shared across220 teams.221- Data retention and access are governed by the product's privacy policy,222 not the CS practice.223224See [references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md](references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md) for the full boundaries reference.225226## Routing and Related Skills227228This skill routes to specialist skills rather than re-deriving their229methodology. All routing references use relative paths to existing230directories, or prose references for skills not yet landed.231232### Routes to (existing skills)233234| Skill | What it owns | How this skill consumes it |235|---|---|---|236| [../product-analytics-and-measurement/SKILL.md](../product-analytics-and-measurement/SKILL.md) | Metric trees, tracking plans, instrumentation QA, measurement governance | Provides health evidence and metric definitions for health/risk records |237| [../product-adoption/SKILL.md](../product-adoption/SKILL.md) | Onboarding, activation, behavior change, feature discovery, sustained use | Provides adoption signals (activation, feature adoption, sustained use) as health dimensions |238| [../product-experimentation/SKILL.md](../product-experimentation/SKILL.md) | Experiment design, readout, ship/no-ship decisions | Consumed when CS evidence suggests an experiment (e.g., intervention test for at-risk accounts) |239| [../go-to-market/SKILL.md](../go-to-market/SKILL.md) | Acquisition campaigns, marketing conversion | Does NOT own. CS consumes acquisition context only. |240| [../crm/SKILL.md](../crm/SKILL.md) | HubSpot CRM operations — contact records, deal pipeline views, confirmed deal stage changes | Provides account records and pipeline/health context for health/risk records and QBR preparation |241242### Routes to (prose references — skills not yet landed)243244| Skill | What it owns | How this skill routes to it |245|---|---|---|246| product-lifecycle-learning | Retirement communication plans, customer treatment during sunset, migration-support coordination, churn-pattern learning across the portfolio | Escalates sustained health decline (2+ remediation attempts failed) for lifecycle action. Routes churn and sunset signals for portfolio-level learning. |247248### Does NOT own249250- **Statistical inference or experiment design** — belongs to `data-scientist` and `product-experimentation`.251- **Product-analytics instrumentation** — belongs to `product-analytics-and-measurement`.252- **Acquisition, marketing conversion, or campaign design** — belongs to `go-to-market`.253- **Product roadmapping or portfolio prioritization** — belongs to `product-roadmapping-and-portfolio`.254- **Customer support operations or ticket management** — belongs to support-tooling skills.255- **Contract negotiation, pricing, or legal terms** — belongs to `go-to-market` and legal-strategy skills.256257## File Map258259| File | Purpose | Load when |260|---|---|---|261| [references/discovery-brief.md](references/discovery-brief.md) | Maps existing related content, ownership boundaries, and routing decisions | First load — required context |262| [references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md](references/privacy-and-human-judgment.md) | Full privacy and human-judgment boundaries, surveillance-risk guidance, consent framework | Privacy or judgment question arises |263| [templates/applicability-decision.md](templates/applicability-decision.md) | Structured applicability assessment — decline or proceed with evidence | Customer-success method considered for any product |264| [templates/success-plan.md](templates/success-plan.md) | Customer success plan with desired outcomes, milestones, evidence gates | Building or reviewing a success plan |265| [templates/health-risk-record.md](templates/health-risk-record.md) | Evidence-based health/risk record with signal, source, trend, confidence, and conflicting-signal tracking | Health review, QBR prep, renewal-risk analysis |266| [templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md](templates/escalation-and-feedback-closure.md) | Escalation path definition and closed-loop feedback closure record | Escalation design or feedback-loop operation |267268## QBR and Engagement Cadence269270### Quarterly Business Review (QBR) Structure271272A QBR is an evidence review, not a sales presentation. The structure:2732741. **Success-plan review** — progress against desired outcomes, milestone275 achievement.2762. **Health evidence** — each dimension, its signal, trend, and confidence.277 Conflicting signals presented, not averaged.2783. **Adoption evidence** — feature adoption, activation trends, sustained-use279 patterns (from product-adoption evidence).2804. **Risk review** — open risks, mitigation status, escalation history.2815. **Forward plan** — next-period success-plan adjustments, expansion282 opportunities (routed to go-to-market for commercial motion), and283 risk-mitigation actions.2846. **Feedback loop status** — open feedback items, product decisions made,285 communication-back status.286287### Triggering QBRs Outside B2B Subscription288289For non-subscription models, QBRs are triggered by events, not calendar dates:290291| Model | QBR Trigger |292|---|---|293| Transactional | Purchase-milestone threshold, account-tier change, or 6-month dormancy |294| Public Service | Service-review cycle, equity-gap detection, or accessibility-audit result |295| Internal Product | Internal service-review cycle, team-reorg, or adoption decline |296297## Output Contract2982991. An **applicability decision** recorded before any CS method is applied.3002. A **success plan** with desired outcomes, milestones, evidence gates, and301 a named relationship owner.3023. A **health/risk record** with evidence per dimension, not a score.3034. An **escalation path** with explicit human-judgment gates.3045. A **closed-loop record** tracing customer insight → product decision →305 customer communication.3066. **Handoff records** to product, support, or engineering with account307 context and evidence.