Building Blocks Advisor

Building Blocks Advisor

Helps choose the right Claude Code extensibility mechanism by analyzing requirements and recommending appropriate building blocks: Skills, Subagents, MCP Servers, Hooks, Templates, or Prompts.

Decision Framework

Follow this process when a user asks about extending Claude Code or automating workflows:

Step 1: Identify Core Requirements

Ask these questions (mentally or to the user if unclear):

Data & Connectivity:

• Does this need access to external data or systems?
• Is data from APIs, databases, or third-party tools required?

Persistence:

• Should this work across multiple conversations?
• Is this a one-time request or repeated workflow?

Automation:

• Should this trigger automatically at specific events?
• Or should it run only when explicitly requested?

Specialization:

• Does this need isolated context or specific tool permissions?
• Should multiple instances run in parallel?

Content Structure:

• Is this primarily about reusable content/boilerplate?
• Or about procedural knowledge and workflows?

Step 2: Apply Decision Logic

Use this flowchart to recommend building blocks:

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Does it need external data/systems? │
└─────────────┬───────────────────────┘
              │
        YES ──┴── Recommend: MCP Server
              │   Examples: Database access, GitHub, Slack,
              │             Google Drive, custom APIs
              │
         NO ──┘
              │
┌─────────────▼───────────────────────┐
│ Should it trigger automatically?    │
└─────────────┬───────────────────────┘
              │
        YES ──┴── Recommend: Hook
              │   Examples: Auto-format on save, run tests
              │             before commit, validate on edit
              │
         NO ──┘
              │
┌─────────────▼───────────────────────┐
│ Is it primarily reusable content?   │
└─────────────┬───────────────────────┘
              │
        YES ──┴── Recommend: Template
              │   Examples: Boilerplate code, document
              │             templates, config file patterns
              │
         NO ──┘
              │
┌─────────────▼───────────────────────┐
│ Does it need isolated context or    │
│ specific tool permissions?          │
└─────────────┬───────────────────────┘
              │
        YES ──┴── Recommend: Subagent
              │   Examples: Code reviewer, security auditor,
              │             test generator, parallel tasks
              │
         NO ──┘
              │
┌─────────────▼───────────────────────┐
│ Will this be used across multiple   │
│ conversations?                      │
└─────────────┬───────────────────────┘
              │
        YES ──┴── Recommend: Skill
              │   Examples: Brand guidelines, domain expertise,
              │             workflows, coding standards
              │
         NO ──┘
              │
         └──── Recommend: Prompt
                 Examples: One-off requests, ad-hoc tasks,
                           interactive refinement

Step 3: Recommend Building Block(s)

Based on the decision logic, recommend one or more building blocks. Many use cases benefit from combining multiple blocks.

Present your recommendation in this format:

## Recommendation: [Building Block Name]

**Why:** [1-2 sentences explaining why this fits the requirements]

**What to create:** [Specific guidance on what to build]

**Example structure:** [Optional - show file/folder structure if helpful]

**Additional considerations:** [Optional - mention complementary building blocks or caveats]

Common Combinations

Many scenarios benefit from combining multiple building blocks:

Skill + MCP:

• MCP provides data access
• Skill teaches Claude how to use that data
• Example: MCP for BigQuery + Skill for query patterns

Skill + Template:

• Template provides content structure
• Skill teaches when and how to use templates
• Example: Skill for brand guidelines + Templates for branded documents

Subagent + Skill:

• Subagent provides isolated context
• Skill teaches domain expertise
• Example: Code review subagent + Testing best practices skill

Hook + Skill:

• Hook automates triggering
• Skill provides the workflow/logic
• Example: Pre-commit hook + Linting skill

MCP + Subagent:

• MCP connects to external data
• Subagent processes data with specific permissions
• Example: Database MCP + Analytics subagent (read-only access)

Example Analyses

Example 1: "I want Claude to always use my company's branding"

Analysis:

• Needs to persist across conversations ✓
• Not automated/event-driven ✗
• Not external data ✗
• Procedural knowledge (brand guidelines) ✓

Recommendation: Skill

Why: Brand guidelines are persistent procedural knowledge that should apply across conversations. A skill can include color palettes, typography rules, logo assets, and usage guidelines.

What to create:

brand-guidelines/
├── SKILL.md (brand rules and when to apply them)
└── assets/
    ├── logo.png
    ├── color-palette.png
    └── templates/ (branded document templates)

Example 2: "I need to query my PostgreSQL database"

Analysis:

• Needs external data access ✓
• Persistent connection ✓

Recommendation: MCP Server

Why: Accessing external databases requires an MCP server to establish persistent connections and expose query tools.

What to create: Use an existing PostgreSQL MCP server or create a custom one if you need specific query patterns.

Additional considerations: Combine with a Skill that teaches Claude about your database schema and common query patterns.

Example 3: "I want code review before every commit"

Analysis:

• Event-driven automation ✓
• Pre-commit timing ✓
• Specialized review context ✓

Recommendation: Hook + Subagent

Why: Use a pre-commit hook to trigger automatically, and a code-reviewer subagent for isolated context and specialized analysis.

What to create:

1. Configure a pre-commit hook in Claude Code settings
2. Hook should spawn the code-reviewer subagent
3. Subagent reviews changes and blocks commit if issues found

Example 4: "I need standard API error response format"

Analysis:

• Reusable content structure ✓
• Not automated ✗
• Not external data ✗

Recommendation: Template (in Skill)

Why: This is a reusable content pattern that doesn't require procedural knowledge.

What to create:

api-patterns/
├── SKILL.md (when to use error templates)
└── assets/
    └── error-response-template.json

Quick Reference Table

Detailed Definitions

For comprehensive explanations of each building block, including characteristics, structure, and best practices, see references/building-blocks.md.

When to consult the reference:

• Need detailed characteristics or capabilities
• Want to understand implementation structure
• Looking for more examples
• Comparing multiple building blocks