How do I install the Capital Allocation skill?

Run npx skillmds add majiayu000/capital-allocation in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Capital Allocation safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Capital Allocation?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Capital Allocation free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Capital Allocation?

majiayu000 (@majiayu000) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Capital Allocation by majiayu000 — Agent Skill

Name: Capital Allocation
Rating: 4.2 (5 reviews)
Author: majiayu000

Capital Allocation

Evaluates where to spend limited capital — investment appraisal, hurdle rates, payback, and comparing proposals that are not alike. Use this to evaluate an investment or major purchase, compare competing funding requests, set a hurdle rate, decide between building and buying, or review whether past investments delivered what was claimed.

majiayu000 2d46ea3 2 files · 4.5 KB Updated Sep 9, 2026 567 repo stars

File contents

Capital allocation

Choosing among investments is choosing what not to do. This is the appraisal of individual proposals; which businesses and bets the company should be in belongs to corporate-strategy:portfolio-strategy.

Appraise on incremental cash

Only cash flows that change because of the decision belong in the analysis:

Sunk costs are irrelevant. Money already spent is not a reason to continue, though it is reliably presented as one.
Allocated overhead is usually irrelevant. If the cost occurs anyway, it does not belong in the incremental case.
Opportunity cost is relevant, including the capacity consumed that then cannot serve anything else.
Working capital is a real outflow. Growth that consumes cash is not free because it is growth.

Discount for time and risk. A hurdle rate should reflect the risk of the specific proposal — applying one company-wide rate systematically overfunds risky projects and starves safe ones.

Read payback for what it tells you

Payback ignores everything after the threshold and so is a poor ranking tool. It is a good liquidity and uncertainty measure: how long capital is at risk, and how far into an uncertain future the case depends on.

Use net present value to decide, payback to understand exposure. A proposal with strong NPV whose returns all arrive in years four and five is a forecasting question as much as an investment one.

Interrogate the case, not the sponsor

Every proposal arrives advocated for. The useful questions are structural:

What has to be true for this to work, and which of those is least certain?
What is the counterfactual — what happens if we do nothing?
Where is the optionality: can it be staged so a small commitment buys information before the large one?
Who is accountable for the benefit after approval?

Stage-gating dominates all-or-nothing commitment where uncertainty is high. Paying for information first is usually cheaper than being right by luck.

Look back, or the numbers stay fictional

Compare realized outcomes against the approved case, and make it routine rather than punitive. Where nobody looks back, forecasts drift optimistic because optimism is rewarded at approval and never tested afterwards.

Never

Include sunk cost in a forward case.
Apply one hurdle rate to proposals of different risk.
Rank by payback.
Approve a benefit with no owner after approval.

---name: capital-allocationdescription: Evaluates where to spend limited capital — investment appraisal, hurdle rates, payback, and comparing proposals that are not alike. Use this to evaluate an investment or major purchase, compare competing funding requests, set a hurdle rate, decide between building and buying, or review whether past investments delivered what was claimed.--- # Capital allocation Choosing among investments is choosing what not to do. This is the appraisal of individual proposals; which businesses and bets the company should be in belongs to `corporate-strategy:portfolio-strategy`. ## Appraise on incremental cash Only cash flows that change because of the decision belong in the analysis: - **Sunk costs are irrelevant.** Money already spent is not a reason to continue, though it is reliably presented as one. - **Allocated overhead is usually irrelevant.** If the cost occurs anyway, it does not belong in the incremental case. - **Opportunity cost is relevant**, including the capacity consumed that then cannot serve anything else. - **Working capital is a real outflow.** Growth that consumes cash is not free because it is growth. Discount for time and risk. A hurdle rate should reflect the risk of the specific proposal — applying one company-wide rate systematically overfunds risky projects and starves safe ones. ## Read payback for what it tells you Payback ignores everything after the threshold and so is a poor ranking tool. It is a good *liquidity and uncertainty* measure: how long capital is at risk, and how far into an uncertain future the case depends on. Use net present value to decide, payback to understand exposure. A proposal with strong NPV whose returns all arrive in years four and five is a forecasting question as much as an investment one. ## Interrogate the case, not the sponsor Every proposal arrives advocated for. The useful questions are structural: - What has to be true for this to work, and which of those is least certain? - What is the counterfactual — what happens if we do nothing? - Where is the optionality: can it be staged so a small commitment buys information before the large one? - Who is accountable for the benefit after approval? Stage-gating dominates all-or-nothing commitment where uncertainty is high. Paying for information first is usually cheaper than being right by luck. ## Look back, or the numbers stay fictional Compare realized outcomes against the approved case, and make it routine rather than punitive. Where nobody looks back, forecasts drift optimistic because optimism is rewarded at approval and never tested afterwards. ## Never - Include sunk cost in a forward case. - Apply one hurdle rate to proposals of different risk. - Rank by payback. - Approve a benefit with no owner after approval.

Frequently asked questions