majiayu000 Changelog From Commits
Overview
Parses git log against the Conventional Commits spec and prints a categorized changelog: Features, Fixes, Performance, Refactoring, Docs, Tests, Build, CI, Chore, Other, plus a BREAKING CHANGES section pulled from ! markers and BREAKING CHANGE: footers. Deterministic — the categorization is a fact about the commit message, not a judgment call, so a script produces it more reliably than a model re-reading commit subjects.
Core principle: A changelog section is either correct (matches the commit's own declared type) or it silently drops/miscategorizes a change. Parsing is not the place for approximation.
Usage
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh [from-ref] [to-ref]
from-refdefaults to the most recent tag, or the repo's root commit if there are no tags.to-refdefaults toHEAD.- Requires a git repository; exits 2 if run outside one.
- Prints Markdown to stdout — pipe into a file, or paste directly into
CHANGELOG.md.
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh v1.2.0 HEAD > /tmp/new-entries.md
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh # since the last tag, to HEAD
What it gets right and what it doesn't
Reliable: type(scope)!: subject parsing, breaking-change detection (! or a BREAKING CHANGE: footer), section grouping, short-hash linking, merge commits excluded automatically.
Falls back to "Other": any commit whose subject doesn't start with a known Conventional Commits type (feat/fix/perf/refactor/docs/test/build/ci/chore) — including free-text subjects like "Initial plan" or "Add X". A repo that doesn't consistently use Conventional Commits will produce a large "Other" section; that's an honest signal about the commit history, not a script bug. See it happen: run this against this library's own pre-2.0 history and most entries land in Other because they predate the Conventional Commits convention adopted later.
Not attempted: rewriting or improving commit subjects, deduplicating near-identical entries, or inferring a type the author didn't declare.
After generating
The script produces raw categorized entries — it does not write prose framing, a version header, or a date. Add those yourself (or ask Claude to), and edit any "Other" entries that deserve reclassification before they ship in a release. Don't paste the raw output into CHANGELOG.md as the final section without a pass over "Other" and "BREAKING CHANGES" — those two sections are exactly where a human or model read adds real value on top of the deterministic parse.
Remember
Categorization is deterministic; the narrative framing around it (a version header, a "why" sentence, what to call out) is not. Do the first with the script, the second with judgment.