How do I install the Codex Collaboration skill?

Run npx skillmds add majiayu000/codex-collaboration in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Codex Collaboration safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Codex Collaboration?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Codex Collaboration free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Codex Collaboration?

majiayu000 (@majiayu000) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Codex Collaboration by majiayu000 — Agent Skill

Name: Codex Collaboration
Rating: 4.2 (5 reviews)
Author: majiayu000

Codex Collaboration

Codex CLI integration for code review and consultation. Use when: (1) code needs review before commit, (2) need expert consultation on implementation approach, (3) debugging assistance needed. This skill provides Codex interaction patterns only - workflow orchestration is defined in project CLAUDE.md.

majiayu000 1f46286 2 files · 2.9 KB Updated Sep 9, 2026 567 repo stars

File contents

Codex Collaboration Skill

Provides Codex CLI interaction patterns for code review and consultation.

Codex CLI Commands

Code Review (Primary Use)

# Standard review
codex review --uncommitted

# Review specific changes
codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "
Review this implementation:
$(git diff)

Check:
1. Correctness
2. Bugs
3. Security
4. Code quality
5. Edge cases

Verdict: PASS or FAIL with issues
"

Consultation

# Ask for guidance
codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "
Context: [CONTEXT]
Question: [SPECIFIC_QUESTION]
"

# Interactive session
codex "Help me with [TOPIC]"

Full Auto Execution

# Let Codex make changes
codex --full-auto "Implement [TASK]"

# With workspace access
codex -C /path/to/project --full-auto "Task"

Review Gate Pattern

Code Change
    │
    ▼
codex review
    │
    ├── PASS → git commit
    │
    └── FAIL → Fix issues → Re-review

Review Result Handling

PASS:

git add .
git commit -m "type(scope): description"

FAIL:

Parse issues from output
Fix each issue
Re-submit: codex review
Repeat until PASS

Model Options

gpt-5.2 - Latest flagship (recommended)
gpt-5.1-codex-mini - Faster, cheaper

Usage Examples

Before Commit

# After implementing a feature
codex review
# If PASS, commit
# If FAIL, fix and re-review

When Stuck

codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "
I'm implementing [TASK].
Current code: [CODE]
Issue: [PROBLEM]
What's the best approach?
"

Architecture Decision

codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "
Option A: [APPROACH_A]
Option B: [APPROACH_B]
Constraints: [CONSTRAINTS]
Which is better and why?
"

---name: codex-collaborationdescription: Codex CLI integration for code review and consultation. Use when: (1) code needs review before commit, (2) need expert consultation on implementation approach, (3) debugging assistance needed. This skill provides Codex interaction patterns only - workflow orchestration is defined in project CLAUDE.md.--- # Codex Collaboration Skill Provides Codex CLI interaction patterns for code review and consultation. ## Codex CLI Commands ### Code Review (Primary Use) ```bash # Standard review codex review --uncommitted # Review specific changes codex exec -m gpt-5.2 " Review this implementation: $(git diff) Check: 1. Correctness 2. Bugs 3. Security 4. Code quality 5. Edge cases Verdict: PASS or FAIL with issues " ``` ### Consultation ```bash # Ask for guidance codex exec -m gpt-5.2 " Context: [CONTEXT] Question: [SPECIFIC_QUESTION] " # Interactive session codex "Help me with [TOPIC]" ``` ### Full Auto Execution ```bash # Let Codex make changes codex --full-auto "Implement [TASK]" # With workspace access codex -C /path/to/project --full-auto "Task" ``` ## Review Gate Pattern ``` Code Change │ ▼ codex review │ ├── PASS → git commit │ └── FAIL → Fix issues → Re-review ``` ### Review Result Handling **PASS:** ```bash git add . git commit -m "type(scope): description" ``` **FAIL:** 1. Parse issues from output 2. Fix each issue 3. Re-submit: `codex review` 4. Repeat until PASS ## Model Options - `gpt-5.2` - Latest flagship (recommended) - `gpt-5.1-codex-mini` - Faster, cheaper ## Usage Examples ### Before Commit ```bash # After implementing a feature codex review # If PASS, commit # If FAIL, fix and re-review ``` ### When Stuck ```bash codex exec -m gpt-5.2 " I'm implementing [TASK]. Current code: [CODE] Issue: [PROBLEM] What's the best approach? " ``` ### Architecture Decision ```bash codex exec -m gpt-5.2 " Option A: [APPROACH_A] Option B: [APPROACH_B] Constraints: [CONSTRAINTS] Which is better and why? " ```

Frequently asked questions