How do I install the Content Quality Report skill?

Run npx skillmds add majiayu000/content-quality-report in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

What does the Content Quality Report skill do?

Generate content quality report: $ARGUMENTS It is listed under Docs & Writing on SkillMD.

Is Content Quality Report safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Content Quality Report?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Content Quality Report free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Content Quality Report?

majiayu000 (@majiayu000) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Content Quality Report by majiayu000

Name: Content Quality Report
Rating: 4.666666666666667 (3 reviews)
Author: majiayu000

File contents

name: content-quality-report description: Generate comprehensive content quality report with competitive SERP analysis argument-hint: [content-path] [target-keyword] disable-model-invocation: true

Generate content quality report: $ARGUMENTS

Step 1: Parse Arguments

Format: First argument = path or identifier for the content to analyze. Second argument = target keyword for SERP competitive analysis.

If no path provided, use available tools to discover recent drafts or content the user might mean, or ask the user to specify.

If no keyword provided, infer from the content's title or H1, or ask the user to provide the target keyword.

Step 2: Load Content

Use available tools (Read, or search/list tools) to load the content at the given path. If the path doesn't exist or isn't accessible, report clearly and suggest alternatives.

Step 3: Run Quality Analysis

Perform or delegate a comprehensive content quality analysis:

Evaluate against standard quality dimensions (readability, structure, citations, depth, etc.)
If SERP/keyword analysis tools are available, run competitive analysis for the target keyword
Produce both structured data (e.g. JSON) and a human-readable markdown report

Step 4: Save Reports

Save the report outputs where the user's environment expects them (e.g. a reports folder, or alongside the content). Use timestamps or versioning so reports are not overwritten. If the environment has no prescribed location, create a sensible one (e.g. _reports/quality/) or ask the user.

Step 5: Present Summary

Present a concise summary to the user:

Content analyzed and target keyword
Overall score and dimension breakdown
Top issues and top strengths
SERP competitive insights (if available)
Where reports were saved
Next steps (address critical issues, add missing topics, re-run after fixes)

Notes

Reports should be timestamped/versioned (never overwritten)
Use whatever tools are available in the environment for SERP or keyword analysis
All quality dimensions that apply should be evaluated in every report

---name: content-quality-reportdescription: Generate content quality report: $ARGUMENTS--- --- name: content-quality-report description: Generate comprehensive content quality report with competitive SERP analysis argument-hint: [content-path] [target-keyword] disable-model-invocation: true --- Generate content quality report: $ARGUMENTS ## Step 1: Parse Arguments **Format:** First argument = path or identifier for the content to analyze. Second argument = target keyword for SERP competitive analysis. If no path provided, use available tools to discover recent drafts or content the user might mean, or ask the user to specify. If no keyword provided, infer from the content's title or H1, or ask the user to provide the target keyword. ## Step 2: Load Content Use available tools (Read, or search/list tools) to load the content at the given path. If the path doesn't exist or isn't accessible, report clearly and suggest alternatives. ## Step 3: Run Quality Analysis Perform or delegate a comprehensive content quality analysis: - Evaluate against standard quality dimensions (readability, structure, citations, depth, etc.) - If SERP/keyword analysis tools are available, run competitive analysis for the target keyword - Produce both structured data (e.g. JSON) and a human-readable markdown report ## Step 4: Save Reports Save the report outputs where the user's environment expects them (e.g. a reports folder, or alongside the content). Use timestamps or versioning so reports are not overwritten. If the environment has no prescribed location, create a sensible one (e.g. `_reports/quality/`) or ask the user. ## Step 5: Present Summary Present a concise summary to the user: - Content analyzed and target keyword - Overall score and dimension breakdown - Top issues and top strengths - SERP competitive insights (if available) - Where reports were saved - Next steps (address critical issues, add missing topics, re-run after fixes) ## Notes - Reports should be timestamped/versioned (never overwritten) - Use whatever tools are available in the environment for SERP or keyword analysis - All quality dimensions that apply should be evaluated in every report

Frequently asked questions