Convert Elixir Elm

Convert Elixir to Elm

Convert Elixir code to idiomatic Elm. This skill extends meta-convert-dev with Elixir-to-Elm specific type mappings, idiom translations, and architectural guidance for translating server-side BEAM code to client-side functional UI.

This Skill Extends

• meta-convert-dev - Foundational conversion patterns (APTV workflow, testing strategies)

For general concepts like the Analyze → Plan → Transform → Validate workflow, testing strategies, and common pitfalls, see the meta-skill first.

This Skill Adds

• Type mappings: Elixir dynamic types → Elm static types
• Idiom translations: Pattern matching, pipelines, and functional patterns
• Architecture translation: GenServer/OTP → The Elm Architecture (TEA)
• Concurrency translation: Processes/message passing → Cmd/Sub model
• Error handling: {:ok, _} / {:error, _} → Result type
• Effect management: Side effects anywhere → Managed Cmd/Sub

This Skill Does NOT Cover

• General conversion methodology - see meta-convert-dev
• Elixir language fundamentals - see lang-elixir-dev
• Elm language fundamentals - see lang-elm-dev
• Reverse conversion (Elm → Elixir) - see convert-elm-elixir
• Server-side Elixir deployment - focus on logic portable to frontend
• Phoenix-specific patterns - Phoenix LiveView is client-server hybrid

Quick Reference

When Converting Code

1. Identify pure business logic - Elm runs in browser, not on BEAM VM
2. Map dynamic types to static - Add explicit type annotations
3. Convert processes to TEA - GenServers become Model-View-Update
4. Translate effects - Side effects become Cmd, subscriptions become Sub
5. Preserve semantics - Both are functional, immutable languages
6. Handle compilation errors first - Elm compiler guides you to correctness
7. Test with property-based tests - Both languages support them well

Type System Mapping

Primitive Types

Collection Types

Composite Types

Function Types

Idiom Translation

Pattern 1: Tagged Tuples → Result

Elixir:

def divide(a, b) when b != 0, do: {:ok, a / b}
def divide(_, 0), do: {:error, :division_by_zero}

case divide(10, 2) do
  {:ok, result} -> IO.puts("Result: #{result}")
  {:error, reason} -> IO.puts("Error: #{reason}")
end

Elm:

divide : Float -> Float -> Result String Float
divide a b =
    if b /= 0 then
        Ok (a / b)
    else
        Err "division_by_zero"

-- Usage
case divide 10 2 of
    Ok result ->
        "Result: " ++ String.fromFloat result

    Err reason ->
        "Error: " ++ reason

Why this translation:

• Elixir's {:ok, value} / {:error, reason} pattern maps directly to Elm's Result error value
• Guards in Elixir (when b != 0) become if-expressions in Elm
• Atoms like :division_by_zero become strings or custom types
• Both use pattern matching in case expressions

Pattern 2: Nil Handling → Maybe

Elixir:

def find_user(id) do
  users = %{1 => %{name: "Alice"}, 2 => %{name: "Bob"}}
  Map.get(users, id)
end

def display_name(user) do
  case user do
    nil -> "Anonymous"
    %{name: name} -> name
  end
end

# Pipeline with defaults
name = find_user(1) |> display_name()

Elm:

findUser : Int -> Maybe User
findUser id =
    let
        users =
            Dict.fromList
                [ ( 1, { name = "Alice" } )
                , ( 2, { name = "Bob" } )
                ]
    in
    Dict.get id users

displayName : Maybe User -> String
displayName maybeUser =
    case maybeUser of
        Nothing ->
            "Anonymous"

        Just user ->
            user.name

-- Pipeline with Maybe.map
name : String
name =
    findUser 1
        |> Maybe.map .name
        |> Maybe.withDefault "Anonymous"

Why this translation:

• Elixir's nil becomes Elm's Nothing
• Present values become Just value
• Maybe.withDefault replaces nil coalescing
• Pattern matching translates directly

Pattern 3: Enum Operations → List Functions

Elixir:

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
|> Enum.filter(&(rem(&1, 2) == 0))
|> Enum.map(&(&1 * 2))
|> Enum.reduce(0, &(&1 + &2))

Elm:

[ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
    |> List.filter (\x -> modBy 2 x == 0)
    |> List.map (\x -> x * 2)
    |> List.foldl (+) 0

Why this translation:

• Enum.filter → List.filter
• Enum.map → List.map
• Enum.reduce → List.foldl (or List.foldr)
• Pipeline operator |> is identical
• Capture operator &() becomes lambda \x ->
• rem becomes modBy in Elm

Pattern 4: Pattern Matching Lists

Elixir:

def sum([]), do: 0
def sum([head | tail]), do: head + sum(tail)

def first([head | _]), do: {:ok, head}
def first([]), do: {:error, :empty_list}

Elm:

sum : List Int -> Int
sum list =
    case list of
        [] ->
            0

        head :: tail ->
            head + sum tail

first : List a -> Result String a
first list =
    case list of
        head :: _ ->
            Ok head

        [] ->
            Err "empty_list"

Why this translation:

• List pattern matching syntax is nearly identical
• [head | tail] in Elixir → head :: tail in Elm
• Multiple function clauses become case branches
• Guards can become if-expressions inside branches

Pattern 5: With Statement → Nested Case or Result.andThen

Elixir:

def create_user(params) do
  with {:ok, validated} <- validate_params(params),
       {:ok, user} <- insert_user(validated),
       {:ok, _email} <- send_welcome_email(user) do
    {:ok, user}
  else
    {:error, reason} -> {:error, reason}
  end
end

Elm:

-- Option 1: Nested case
createUser : Params -> Result Error User
createUser params =
    case validateParams params of
        Ok validated ->
            case insertUser validated of
                Ok user ->
                    case sendWelcomeEmail user of
                        Ok _ ->
                            Ok user

                        Err reason ->
                            Err reason

                Err reason ->
                    Err reason

        Err reason ->
            Err reason

-- Option 2: Result.andThen (preferred)
createUser : Params -> Result Error User
createUser params =
    validateParams params
        |> Result.andThen insertUser
        |> Result.andThen (\user ->
            sendWelcomeEmail user
                |> Result.map (\_ -> user)
        )

Why this translation:

• Elixir's with chains {:ok, _} results
• Elm uses Result.andThen for equivalent chaining
• Early error returns are handled by Result's short-circuiting
• Pipeline style preserves readability

Architecture Translation: GenServer → The Elm Architecture

GenServer State Management

Elixir (GenServer):

defmodule Counter do
  use GenServer

  # Client API
  def start_link(initial_value) do
    GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, initial_value, name: __MODULE__)
  end

  def increment do
    GenServer.call(__MODULE__, :increment)
  end

  def get do
    GenServer.call(__MODULE__, :get)
  end

  # Server Callbacks
  @impl true
  def init(initial_value), do: {:ok, initial_value}

  @impl true
  def handle_call(:increment, _from, state) do
    {:reply, state + 1, state + 1}
  end

  def handle_call(:get, _from, state) do
    {:reply, state, state}
  end
end

Elm (TEA Model):

-- MODEL
type alias Model =
    { count : Int
    }

init : () -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
init _ =
    ( { count = 0 }, Cmd.none )

-- UPDATE
type Msg
    = Increment
    | Get

update : Msg -> Model -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
update msg model =
    case msg of
        Increment ->
            ( { model | count = model.count + 1 }, Cmd.none )

        Get ->
            -- In Elm, view always has access to model
            -- No need for explicit "get" message
            ( model, Cmd.none )

-- VIEW
view : Model -> Html Msg
view model =
    div []
        [ button [ onClick Increment ] [ text "+" ]
        , div [] [ text (String.fromInt model.count) ]
        ]

Why this translation:

• GenServer state → Model
• Client API calls → Msg variants
• handle_call → update function branches
• Synchronous replies → View reads model directly
• No process needed; Elm runtime manages state

Process Communication → Cmd/Sub

Elixir (Process Messages):

# Sending process
pid = spawn(fn ->
  receive do
    {:fetch_user, caller, user_id} ->
      user = fetch_user_from_db(user_id)
      send(caller, {:user_fetched, user})
  end
end)

send(pid, {:fetch_user, self(), 123})

receive do
  {:user_fetched, user} -> IO.inspect(user)
after
  5000 -> IO.puts("Timeout")
end

Elm (Commands and Subscriptions):

-- Commands represent effects to perform
type Msg
    = FetchUser Int
    | GotUser (Result Http.Error User)

update : Msg -> Model -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
update msg model =
    case msg of
        FetchUser userId ->
            ( { model | loading = True }
            , Http.get
                { url = "/api/users/" ++ String.fromInt userId
                , expect = Http.expectJson GotUser userDecoder
                }
            )

        GotUser result ->
            case result of
                Ok user ->
                    ( { model | user = Just user, loading = False }
                    , Cmd.none
                    )

                Err _ ->
                    ( { model | loading = False }
                    , Cmd.none
                    )

-- Subscriptions for incoming events
subscriptions : Model -> Sub Msg
subscriptions model =
    -- Listen to time every second
    Time.every 1000 Tick

Why this translation:

• send → Create Cmd in update
• receive → Handle Msg in update
• Process spawning → Cmd.batch for multiple effects
• Message passing → Msg type with variants
• Timeouts → Handled by Sub/Cmd cancellation

Supervision Trees → Application Structure

Elixir (Supervisor):

defmodule MyApp.Application do
  use Application

  def start(_type, _args) do
    children = [
      {Counter, 0},
      {UserCache, []},
      {DatabasePool, pool_size: 10}
    ]

    opts = [strategy: :one_for_one, name: MyApp.Supervisor]
    Supervisor.start_link(children, opts)
  end
end

Elm (Module Organization):

-- No supervision needed - no crashes!
-- Instead: Organize code into modules

-- Main.elm
module Main exposing (main)

import Browser
import Counter
import UserCache

type alias Model =
    { counter : Counter.Model
    , userCache : UserCache.Model
    }

type Msg
    = CounterMsg Counter.Msg
    | UserCacheMsg UserCache.Msg

init : () -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
init _ =
    let
        ( counterModel, counterCmd ) =
            Counter.init ()

        ( cacheModel, cacheCmd ) =
            UserCache.init ()
    in
    ( { counter = counterModel
      , userCache = cacheModel
      }
    , Cmd.batch
        [ Cmd.map CounterMsg counterCmd
        , Cmd.map UserCacheMsg cacheCmd
        ]
    )

update : Msg -> Model -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
update msg model =
    case msg of
        CounterMsg subMsg ->
            let
                ( counterModel, counterCmd ) =
                    Counter.update subMsg model.counter
            in
            ( { model | counter = counterModel }
            , Cmd.map CounterMsg counterCmd
            )

        UserCacheMsg subMsg ->
            let
                ( cacheModel, cacheCmd ) =
                    UserCache.update subMsg model.userCache
            in
            ( { model | userCache = cacheModel }
            , Cmd.map UserCacheMsg cacheCmd
            )

Why this translation:

• No supervision needed - Elm has no runtime exceptions
• Module composition replaces supervision trees
• Each "child" is a module with its own Model/Msg/update
• Parent routes messages to appropriate child module
• Cmd.map translates between parent and child messages

Concurrency Model Translation

Elixir: Process-Based Concurrency

# Multiple concurrent processes
tasks = Enum.map(user_ids, fn id ->
  Task.async(fn -> fetch_user(id) end)
end)

users = Task.await_many(tasks, 5000)

Elm: Command-Based Concurrency

-- Multiple HTTP requests (runtime handles concurrency)
type Msg
    = FetchUsers
    | GotUser Int (Result Http.Error User)

fetchUsers : List Int -> Cmd Msg
fetchUsers userIds =
    userIds
        |> List.map (\id ->
            Http.get
                { url = "/api/users/" ++ String.fromInt id
                , expect = Http.expectJson (GotUser id) userDecoder
                }
        )
        |> Cmd.batch

update : Msg -> Model -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
update msg model =
    case msg of
        FetchUsers ->
            ( { model | loading = True }
            , fetchUsers [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
            )

        GotUser id result ->
            -- Each response handled as it arrives
            case result of
                Ok user ->
                    ( { model | users = Dict.insert id user model.users }
                    , Cmd.none
                    )

                Err _ ->
                    ( model, Cmd.none )

Why this translation:

• Elixir's Task.async → Elm's Cmd.batch
• Elixir manages processes explicitly → Elm runtime handles concurrency
• Both allow multiple operations in flight
• Elm guarantees serialized message handling (no race conditions)

GenServer Periodic Work → Time Subscriptions

Elixir:

defmodule PeriodicWorker do
  use GenServer

  def start_link(_), do: GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, %{}, name: __MODULE__)

  def init(state) do
    schedule_work()
    {:ok, state}
  end

  def handle_info(:work, state) do
    do_work()
    schedule_work()
    {:noreply, state}
  end

  defp schedule_work do
    Process.send_after(self(), :work, 5000)
  end
end

Elm:

import Time

type Msg
    = DoWork Time.Posix

subscriptions : Model -> Sub Msg
subscriptions model =
    Time.every 5000 DoWork  -- 5000 milliseconds

update : Msg -> Model -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
update msg model =
    case msg of
        DoWork time ->
            ( model, performWork time )

performWork : Time.Posix -> Cmd Msg
performWork time =
    -- Perform work here
    Cmd.none

Why this translation:

• Process.send_after → Time.every subscription
• handle_info → update with time-based Msg
• No manual rescheduling needed; Sub is continuous
• Elm runtime manages subscription lifecycle

Error Handling

Elixir Error Patterns

# Pattern 1: Tagged tuples
{:ok, value} | {:error, reason}

# Pattern 2: Raise/rescue
try do
  dangerous_operation()
rescue
  e in RuntimeError -> {:error, e.message}
end

# Pattern 3: Pattern match or default
user = find_user(id) || %User{name: "Anonymous"}

# Pattern 4: With statement
with {:ok, a} <- step1(),
     {:ok, b} <- step2(a) do
  {:ok, b}
else
  {:error, reason} -> {:error, reason}
end

Elm Error Patterns

-- Pattern 1: Result type
Ok value | Err reason

-- Pattern 2: No exceptions!
-- All errors are values
dangerousOperation : () -> Result String Value
dangerousOperation () =
    -- Cannot throw, must return Result

-- Pattern 3: Maybe with default
user : User
user =
    findUser id
        |> Maybe.withDefault { name = "Anonymous" }

-- Pattern 4: Result.andThen
processData : Input -> Result String Output
processData input =
    step1 input
        |> Result.andThen step2
        |> Result.andThen step3

Key Differences:

• Elm has NO exceptions - all errors are Result or Maybe values
• No try/rescue needed - compiler enforces error handling
• with statement → Result.andThen chaining
• Pattern matching on errors is identical

Testing Strategy

Property-Based Testing

Elixir (StreamData):

defmodule MathTest do
  use ExUnit.Case
  use ExUnitProperties

  property "addition is commutative" do
    check all x <- integer(),
              y <- integer() do
      assert Math.add(x, y) == Math.add(y, x)
    end
  end

  property "list reverse is idempotent" do
    check all list <- list_of(integer()) do
      assert list |> Enum.reverse() |> Enum.reverse() == list
    end
  end
end

Elm (elm-test with fuzz):

module MathTest exposing (..)

import Expect
import Fuzz exposing (int, list)
import Test exposing (Test, describe, fuzz, fuzz2)

suite : Test
suite =
    describe "Math properties"
        [ fuzz2 int int "addition is commutative" <|
            \x y ->
                Math.add x y
                    |> Expect.equal (Math.add y x)

        , fuzz (list int) "list reverse is idempotent" <|
            \list ->
                list
                    |> List.reverse
                    |> List.reverse
                    |> Expect.equal list
        ]

Why this translation:

• Both support property-based testing
• check all → fuzz / fuzz2
• Generators translate directly
• Same test philosophy

Unit Testing

Elixir:

test "parses valid age" do
  assert {:ok, 25} = parse_age("25")
end

test "rejects negative age" do
  assert {:error, _} = parse_age("-5")
end

Elm:

test "parses valid age" <|
    \_ ->
        parseAge "25"
            |> Expect.equal (Ok 25)

test "rejects negative age" <|
    \_ ->
        parseAge "-5"
            |> Expect.err

Common Pitfalls

1. Expecting Runtime Dynamism

# Elixir: Dynamic typing allows this
defmodule Flexible do
  def process(value) when is_integer(value), do: value * 2
  def process(value) when is_binary(value), do: String.upcase(value)
end

process(5)      # 10
process("hi")   # "HI"

-- Elm: Must use union types for different types
type Value
    = IntValue Int
    | StringValue String

process : Value -> String
process value =
    case value of
        IntValue int ->
            String.fromInt (int * 2)

        StringValue str ->
            String.toUpper str

-- Usage
process (IntValue 5)       -- "10"
process (StringValue "hi") -- "HI"

Fix: Define explicit union types for polymorphic values.

2. Side Effects Anywhere vs. Managed Effects

# Elixir: Can perform IO anywhere
def get_user(id) do
  IO.puts("Fetching user #{id}")  # Side effect!
  Database.get(:users, id)         # Side effect!
end

-- Elm: All effects through Cmd
getUser : Int -> Cmd Msg
getUser id =
    -- Cannot perform side effects directly
    -- Must return Cmd for Elm runtime
    Http.get
        { url = "/api/users/" ++ String.fromInt id
        , expect = Http.expectJson GotUser userDecoder
        }

-- "Logging" must also be a command (via port)
port logMessage : String -> Cmd msg

getUserWithLog : Int -> Cmd Msg
getUserWithLog id =
    Cmd.batch
        [ logMessage ("Fetching user " ++ String.fromInt id)
        , getUser id
        ]

Fix: Plan where effects belong in your Elm architecture.

3. Assuming Atoms Translate to Strings

# Elixir: Atoms are efficient, unique
:ok
:error
:atom_name

-- Elm: Create custom types instead
type Status
    = Ok
    | Error
    | AtomName

-- NOT strings!
-- type Status = String  -- WRONG - loses type safety

Fix: Use union types for atom-like values, not strings.

4. GenServer State vs. TEA Model

# Elixir: State hidden in process
GenServer.call(MyServer, :get_state)

-- Elm: State is always in Model, always visible to view
view : Model -> Html Msg
view model =
    -- Direct access to all state
    div [] [ text model.name ]

Fix: In Elm, embrace that all state is in Model and visible.

5. Expecting to "Let It Crash"

# Elixir: Supervision restarts crashed processes
def risky_operation(value) do
  # If this crashes, supervisor restarts the process
  dangerous_thing(value)
end

-- Elm: NO CRASHES - compiler guarantees no runtime exceptions
riskyOperation : Value -> Result Error Output
riskyOperation value =
    -- Must handle all error cases explicitly
    case dangerousThing value of
        Ok result ->
            Ok result

        Err error ->
            Err error

Fix: Handle all error cases explicitly with Result type.

Tooling

Example: Complete Conversion

Elixir: User Management Module

defmodule UserManager do
  use GenServer

  # Client API
  def start_link(_) do
    GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, %{}, name: __MODULE__)
  end

  def add_user(user) do
    GenServer.call(__MODULE__, {:add, user})
  end

  def get_user(id) do
    GenServer.call(__MODULE__, {:get, id})
  end

  def list_users do
    GenServer.call(__MODULE__, :list)
  end

  # Server Callbacks
  @impl true
  def init(_) do
    {:ok, %{}}
  end

  @impl true
  def handle_call({:add, user}, _from, state) do
    new_state = Map.put(state, user.id, user)
    {:reply, {:ok, user}, new_state}
  end

  def handle_call({:get, id}, _from, state) do
    result = Map.get(state, id)
    {:reply, result, state}
  end

  def handle_call(:list, _from, state) do
    users = Map.values(state)
    {:reply, users, state}
  end
end

# Usage
{:ok, _} = UserManager.start_link([])
UserManager.add_user(%{id: 1, name: "Alice"})
UserManager.list_users()

Elm: User Management in TEA

module Main exposing (main)

import Browser
import Dict exposing (Dict)
import Html exposing (Html, button, div, input, text)
import Html.Attributes exposing (placeholder, value)
import Html.Events exposing (onClick, onInput)

-- MODEL

type alias User =
    { id : Int
    , name : String
    }

type alias Model =
    { users : Dict Int User
    , nextId : Int
    , nameInput : String
    }

init : () -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
init _ =
    ( { users = Dict.empty
      , nextId = 1
      , nameInput = ""
      }
    , Cmd.none
    )

-- UPDATE

type Msg
    = AddUser
    | SetNameInput String
    | RemoveUser Int

update : Msg -> Model -> ( Model, Cmd Msg )
update msg model =
    case msg of
        AddUser ->
            if String.isEmpty model.nameInput then
                ( model, Cmd.none )
            else
                let
                    user =
                        { id = model.nextId
                        , name = model.nameInput
                        }

                    newUsers =
                        Dict.insert model.nextId user model.users
                in
                ( { model
                    | users = newUsers
                    | nextId = model.nextId + 1
                    | nameInput = ""
                  }
                , Cmd.none
                )

        SetNameInput name ->
            ( { model | nameInput = name }, Cmd.none )

        RemoveUser id ->
            ( { model | users = Dict.remove id model.users }
            , Cmd.none
            )

-- VIEW

view : Model -> Html Msg
view model =
    div []
        [ div []
            [ input
                [ placeholder "Enter name"
                , value model.nameInput
                , onInput SetNameInput
                ]
                []
            , button [ onClick AddUser ] [ text "Add User" ]
            ]
        , div [] (viewUsers model.users)
        ]

viewUsers : Dict Int User -> List (Html Msg)
viewUsers users =
    users
        |> Dict.values
        |> List.map viewUser

viewUser : User -> Html Msg
viewUser user =
    div []
        [ text user.name
        , button [ onClick (RemoveUser user.id) ] [ text "Remove" ]
        ]

-- MAIN

main : Program () Model Msg
main =
    Browser.element
        { init = init
        , update = update
        , view = view
        , subscriptions = \_ -> Sub.none
        }

Key Translation Points:

1. GenServer state → Model record
2. handle_call → update function branches
3. Client API → Msg variants
4. Synchronous calls → Direct model access in view
5. Map-based storage → Dict in Elm

See Also

For more examples and patterns, see:

• meta-convert-dev - Foundational patterns with cross-language examples
• convert-elm-scala - Related conversion from Elm
• convert-haskell-elm - Similar pure functional → frontend conversion
• lang-elixir-dev - Elixir development patterns
• lang-elm-dev - Elm development patterns

Cross-cutting pattern skills:

• patterns-concurrency-dev - Processes, async, and message passing across languages
• patterns-serialization-dev - JSON handling and data encoding patterns
• patterns-metaprogramming-dev - Compare dynamic features to type-driven design