Purpose
Aggregate and analyze customer feedback from all sources - meeting notes, person pages, feedback captures - to identify patterns, prioritize pain points, and inform product decisions.
Usage
/customer-intel - Review last 30 days of feedback
/customer-intel [timeframe] - Specify timeframe (e.g., "last week", "Q1", "last 90 days")
/customer-intel [customer-name] - Deep dive on specific customer
Step 1: Gather Customer Feedback
Search across multiple sources for customer mentions:
Primary Sources
00-Inbox/Meetings/ - Meeting notes from last 30 days (or specified timeframe)
- Search for: customer names, company names, "customer said", "feedback", "pain point"
People/ - Customer person pages (External/ directory)
- Check for recent notes, pain points mentioned, feature requests
00-Inbox/Customer_Feedback/ (if exists) - Dedicated feedback captures
04-Projects/ - Customer mentions in project context
Keywords to Search
- Pain points: "frustrated", "pain", "problem", "issue", "struggle"
- Feature requests: "want", "need", "wish", "could we", "feature request"
- Competitive: "competitor", "vs", "compared to", "switching"
- Positive: "love", "great", "works well", "helpful"
Step 2: Categorize and Theme
Group findings into categories:
Pain Points
- What customers are frustrated with
- What's not working for them
- What's taking too long or too manual
Feature Requests
- Specific features customers have asked for
- Capabilities they wish existed
- Improvements to existing features
Competitive Intel
- What competitors are doing better
- Why customers might switch
- What we're missing vs competition
Wins
- What customers love
- What's working really well
- What differentiates us positively
Step 3: Identify Patterns
For each theme, identify:
- Frequency - How many times this was mentioned
- Customers - Which customers mentioned it
- Urgency - High (blocker), Medium (painful), Low (nice-to-have)
- Trend - Increasing, stable, or decreasing mentions
Step 4: Cross-Reference with Roadmap
Check if pain points or requests are already being addressed:
- Search 04-Projects/ for related work
- Note if addressed, planned, or not on roadmap
- Flag opportunities where demand exists but no work planned
Step 5: Generate Intelligence Report
Present findings in this format:
# 🎯 Customer Intelligence Report
**Period:** [Timeframe]
**Sources analyzed:** [Count] meetings, [Count] person pages, [Count] feedback captures
**Customers represented:** [Count]
---
## 🔥 Top Pain Points
### [Pain Point Theme]
**Mentioned by:** [X customers] ([Customer names])
**Frequency:** [X mentions] in last [timeframe]
**Urgency:** High / Medium / Low
**Trend:** ↑ Increasing / → Stable / ↓ Decreasing
**Details:**
- "[Quote from customer 1]" - [Customer name], [Date]
- "[Quote from customer 2]" - [Customer name], [Date]
**Roadmap status:** [On roadmap / Planned / Not planned]
**Related project:** [Link to 04-Projects/ file if exists]
---
## ✨ Feature Requests
[Same format as pain points]
---
## 🏆 Competitive Mentions
[Same format]
---
## 💚 What's Working
[Same format]
---
## 🎯 Recommendations
### Immediate Actions
1. [Action based on high-urgency items with increasing trend]
2. [Action based on frequency across multiple customers]
### Product Opportunities
1. [Opportunity where demand exists but no roadmap coverage]
2. [Opportunity where competitive gap is mentioned]
### Customer Follow-Ups
1. [Customer name] - [Why to follow up]
2. [Customer name] - [Why to follow up]
---
## 📊 Summary
**High-urgency items:** [Count]
**Feature requests:** [Count unique requests]
**Competitive threats:** [Count mentions]
**Customers needing follow-up:** [Count]
**Top 3 insights:**
1. [Insight with the strongest signal]
2. [Insight with increasing trend]
3. [Insight with competitive implication]
Step 6: Offer Actions
After presenting the report, ask:
"Want me to:
- Create a feature brief for [top requested item]?
- Update person pages with this intelligence?
- Generate a stakeholder memo on these findings?
- Deep dive on [specific customer or theme]?"
Timeframe Parsing
Support natural language timeframes:
- "last week" = 7 days
- "last month" = 30 days
- "last quarter" = 90 days
- "Q1" = Jan 1 - Mar 31 of current year
- "last 90 days" = 90 days
Customer-Specific Deep Dive
When user specifies a customer:
- Pull all mentions of that customer across all sources
- Build chronological timeline of feedback
- Identify their top pain points and requests
- Show progression of their sentiment over time
- Link to their person page for full context
Integration with Other Skills
- After running this: Suggest
/feature-decision for top requested items
- If competitive gaps found: Suggest
/roadmap to check coverage
- If customer follow-ups needed: Suggest
/meeting-prep [customer]
Example Output
# 🎯 Customer Intelligence Report
**Period:** Last 30 days (Dec 29 - Jan 28)
**Sources analyzed:** 23 meetings, 12 person pages, 5 feedback captures
**Customers represented:** 18
---
## 🔥 Top Pain Points
### Reporting Takes Too Long
**Mentioned by:** 4 customers (Acme Corp, TechStart, GlobalCo, DataFlow)
**Frequency:** 7 mentions in last 30 days
**Urgency:** High (2 customers called it a "blocker")
**Trend:** ↑ Increasing (3 mentions this week vs 1/week prior)
**Details:**
- "Takes 2 days/month to compile reports manually. Need real-time dashboards." - Sarah (Acme), Jan 24
- "Our team wastes hours every week on reporting. This should be automated." - Mike (TechStart), Jan 20
- "Reporting pain is my team's #1 complaint. They avoid the system because of it." - Lisa (GlobalCo), Jan 15
**Roadmap status:** Not planned
**Related project:** None
---
### Mobile App Performance
**Mentioned by:** 3 customers (Acme Corp, StartupX, InnovateCo)
**Frequency:** 5 mentions in last 30 days
**Urgency:** Medium
**Trend:** → Stable
**Details:**
- "Mobile app is slow to load. Team doesn't use it in the field." - John (StartupX), Jan 18
- "Love the desktop experience but mobile needs work" - Sarah (Acme), Jan 12
**Roadmap status:** On roadmap (Mobile App Refresh project)
**Related project:** 04-Projects/Mobile_App_Refresh.md
---
## ✨ Feature Requests
### Real-time Notifications
**Mentioned by:** 5 customers (Acme, TechStart, GlobalCo, StartupX, FastGrow)
**Frequency:** 8 mentions in last 30 days
**Urgency:** Medium
**Trend:** ↑ Increasing
**Details:**
- "We miss important updates because we don't check the app constantly" - Sarah (Acme), Jan 24
- "Push notifications would be game-changing for our workflow" - FastGrow team, Jan 19
**Roadmap status:** On roadmap (Q1 beta launch Feb 5)
**Related project:** 04-Projects/Real_Time_Notifications.md
---
## 🏆 Competitive Mentions
### Competitor ProductX Has Better Dashboard
**Mentioned by:** 2 customers (TechStart, DataFlow)
**Frequency:** 3 mentions
**Urgency:** High (1 customer evaluating switch)
**Trend:** ↑ Increasing (new threat)
**Details:**
- "ProductX's dashboards are way ahead of yours. We're evaluating a switch." - Mike (TechStart), Jan 20
- "Showed us ProductX demo. Their reporting is impressive." - DataFlow, Jan 16
**Roadmap status:** Not planned
**Related project:** None
---
## 💚 What's Working
### API Integration
**Mentioned by:** 6 customers
**Frequency:** 9 positive mentions
**Details:**
- "API is rock solid. Never had integration issues." - Multiple customers
- "API docs are best-in-class" - Developer at InnovateCo
---
## 🎯 Recommendations
### Immediate Actions
1. **Address reporting pain** - 4 customers, increasing trend, 2 calling it blocker
2. **Respond to ProductX competitive threat** - TechStart evaluating switch
### Product Opportunities
1. **Real-time dashboards** - Strong demand (7 mentions), no roadmap coverage, competitive gap
2. **Automated reporting** - Clear pain point, affects multiple workflows
### Customer Follow-Ups
1. **TechStart (Mike)** - At-risk due to ProductX evaluation, needs reporting solution
2. **Acme Corp (Sarah)** - Consistent high-value feedback, strong champion, engage on roadmap
---
## 📊 Summary
**High-urgency items:** 3
**Feature requests:** 12 unique requests
**Competitive threats:** 2 mentions
**Customers needing follow-up:** 2
**Top 3 insights:**
1. **Reporting pain is accelerating** - Went from background complaint to blocker status
2. **ProductX emerging as competitive threat** - New mentions this month, dashboard focus
3. **Mobile performance preventing adoption** - 3 customers, but already on roadmap
1---2name: customer-intel3description: Synthesize recent customer feedback and pain points4---5
6## Purpose
7
8Aggregate and analyze customer feedback from all sources - meeting notes, person pages, feedback captures - to identify patterns, prioritize pain points, and inform product decisions.
9
10## Usage
11
12- `/customer-intel` - Review last 30 days of feedback
13- `/customer-intel [timeframe]` - Specify timeframe (e.g., "last week", "Q1", "last 90 days")
14- `/customer-intel [customer-name]` - Deep dive on specific customer
15
16---
17
18## Step 1: Gather Customer Feedback
19
20Search across multiple sources for customer mentions:
21
22### Primary Sources
23
241. **00-Inbox/Meetings/** - Meeting notes from last 30 days (or specified timeframe)
25 - Search for: customer names, company names, "customer said", "feedback", "pain point"
26
272. **People/** - Customer person pages (External/ directory)
28 - Check for recent notes, pain points mentioned, feature requests
29
303. **00-Inbox/Customer_Feedback/** (if exists) - Dedicated feedback captures
31
324. **04-Projects/** - Customer mentions in project context
33
34### Keywords to Search
35
36- Pain points: "frustrated", "pain", "problem", "issue", "struggle"
37- Feature requests: "want", "need", "wish", "could we", "feature request"
38- Competitive: "competitor", "vs", "compared to", "switching"
39- Positive: "love", "great", "works well", "helpful"
40
41---
42
43## Step 2: Categorize and Theme
44
45Group findings into categories:
46
47### Pain Points
48- What customers are frustrated with
49- What's not working for them
50- What's taking too long or too manual
51
52### Feature Requests
53- Specific features customers have asked for
54- Capabilities they wish existed
55- Improvements to existing features
56
57### Competitive Intel
58- What competitors are doing better
59- Why customers might switch
60- What we're missing vs competition
61
62### Wins
63- What customers love
64- What's working really well
65- What differentiates us positively
66
67---
68
69## Step 3: Identify Patterns
70
71For each theme, identify:
72
731. **Frequency** - How many times this was mentioned
742. **Customers** - Which customers mentioned it
753. **Urgency** - High (blocker), Medium (painful), Low (nice-to-have)
764. **Trend** - Increasing, stable, or decreasing mentions
77
78---
79
80## Step 4: Cross-Reference with Roadmap
81
82Check if pain points or requests are already being addressed:
83
841. Search 04-Projects/ for related work
852. Note if addressed, planned, or not on roadmap
863. Flag opportunities where demand exists but no work planned
87
88---
89
90## Step 5: Generate Intelligence Report
91
92Present findings in this format:
93
94```markdown
95# 🎯 Customer Intelligence Report
96
97**Period:** [Timeframe]
98**Sources analyzed:** [Count] meetings, [Count] person pages, [Count] feedback captures
99**Customers represented:** [Count]
100
101---
102
103## 🔥 Top Pain Points
104
105### [Pain Point Theme]
106**Mentioned by:** [X customers] ([Customer names])
107**Frequency:** [X mentions] in last [timeframe]
108**Urgency:** High / Medium / Low
109**Trend:** ↑ Increasing / → Stable / ↓ Decreasing
110
111**Details:**
112- "[Quote from customer 1]" - [Customer name], [Date]
113- "[Quote from customer 2]" - [Customer name], [Date]
114
115**Roadmap status:** [On roadmap / Planned / Not planned]
116**Related project:** [Link to 04-Projects/ file if exists]
117
118---
119
120## ✨ Feature Requests
121
122[Same format as pain points]
123
124---
125
126## 🏆 Competitive Mentions
127
128[Same format]
129
130---
131
132## 💚 What's Working
133
134[Same format]
135
136---
137
138## 🎯 Recommendations
139
140### Immediate Actions
1411. [Action based on high-urgency items with increasing trend]
1422. [Action based on frequency across multiple customers]
143
144### Product Opportunities
1451. [Opportunity where demand exists but no roadmap coverage]
1462. [Opportunity where competitive gap is mentioned]
147
148### Customer Follow-Ups
1491. [Customer name] - [Why to follow up]
1502. [Customer name] - [Why to follow up]
151
152---
153
154## 📊 Summary
155
156**High-urgency items:** [Count]
157**Feature requests:** [Count unique requests]
158**Competitive threats:** [Count mentions]
159**Customers needing follow-up:** [Count]
160
161**Top 3 insights:**
1621. [Insight with the strongest signal]
1632. [Insight with increasing trend]
1643. [Insight with competitive implication]
165```
166
167---
168
169## Step 6: Offer Actions
170
171After presenting the report, ask:
172
173> "Want me to:
174> 1. Create a feature brief for [top requested item]?
175> 2. Update person pages with this intelligence?
176> 3. Generate a stakeholder memo on these findings?
177> 4. Deep dive on [specific customer or theme]?"
178
179---
180
181## Timeframe Parsing
182
183Support natural language timeframes:
184- "last week" = 7 days
185- "last month" = 30 days
186- "last quarter" = 90 days
187- "Q1" = Jan 1 - Mar 31 of current year
188- "last 90 days" = 90 days
189
190---
191
192## Customer-Specific Deep Dive
193
194When user specifies a customer:
195
1961. Pull all mentions of that customer across all sources
1972. Build chronological timeline of feedback
1983. Identify their top pain points and requests
1994. Show progression of their sentiment over time
2005. Link to their person page for full context
201
202---
203
204## Integration with Other Skills
205
206- **After running this:** Suggest `/feature-decision` for top requested items
207- **If competitive gaps found:** Suggest `/roadmap` to check coverage
208- **If customer follow-ups needed:** Suggest `/meeting-prep [customer]`
209
210---
211
212## Example Output
213
214```markdown
215# 🎯 Customer Intelligence Report
216
217**Period:** Last 30 days (Dec 29 - Jan 28)
218**Sources analyzed:** 23 meetings, 12 person pages, 5 feedback captures
219**Customers represented:** 18
220
221---
222
223## 🔥 Top Pain Points
224
225### Reporting Takes Too Long
226**Mentioned by:** 4 customers (Acme Corp, TechStart, GlobalCo, DataFlow)
227**Frequency:** 7 mentions in last 30 days
228**Urgency:** High (2 customers called it a "blocker")
229**Trend:** ↑ Increasing (3 mentions this week vs 1/week prior)
230
231**Details:**
232- "Takes 2 days/month to compile reports manually. Need real-time dashboards." - Sarah (Acme), Jan 24
233- "Our team wastes hours every week on reporting. This should be automated." - Mike (TechStart), Jan 20
234- "Reporting pain is my team's #1 complaint. They avoid the system because of it." - Lisa (GlobalCo), Jan 15
235
236**Roadmap status:** Not planned
237**Related project:** None
238
239---
240
241### Mobile App Performance
242**Mentioned by:** 3 customers (Acme Corp, StartupX, InnovateCo)
243**Frequency:** 5 mentions in last 30 days
244**Urgency:** Medium
245**Trend:** → Stable
246
247**Details:**
248- "Mobile app is slow to load. Team doesn't use it in the field." - John (StartupX), Jan 18
249- "Love the desktop experience but mobile needs work" - Sarah (Acme), Jan 12
250
251**Roadmap status:** On roadmap (Mobile App Refresh project)
252**Related project:** 04-Projects/Mobile_App_Refresh.md
253
254---
255
256## ✨ Feature Requests
257
258### Real-time Notifications
259**Mentioned by:** 5 customers (Acme, TechStart, GlobalCo, StartupX, FastGrow)
260**Frequency:** 8 mentions in last 30 days
261**Urgency:** Medium
262**Trend:** ↑ Increasing
263
264**Details:**
265- "We miss important updates because we don't check the app constantly" - Sarah (Acme), Jan 24
266- "Push notifications would be game-changing for our workflow" - FastGrow team, Jan 19
267
268**Roadmap status:** On roadmap (Q1 beta launch Feb 5)
269**Related project:** 04-Projects/Real_Time_Notifications.md
270
271---
272
273## 🏆 Competitive Mentions
274
275### Competitor ProductX Has Better Dashboard
276**Mentioned by:** 2 customers (TechStart, DataFlow)
277**Frequency:** 3 mentions
278**Urgency:** High (1 customer evaluating switch)
279**Trend:** ↑ Increasing (new threat)
280
281**Details:**
282- "ProductX's dashboards are way ahead of yours. We're evaluating a switch." - Mike (TechStart), Jan 20
283- "Showed us ProductX demo. Their reporting is impressive." - DataFlow, Jan 16
284
285**Roadmap status:** Not planned
286**Related project:** None
287
288---
289
290## 💚 What's Working
291
292### API Integration
293**Mentioned by:** 6 customers
294**Frequency:** 9 positive mentions
295
296**Details:**
297- "API is rock solid. Never had integration issues." - Multiple customers
298- "API docs are best-in-class" - Developer at InnovateCo
299
300---
301
302## 🎯 Recommendations
303
304### Immediate Actions
3051. **Address reporting pain** - 4 customers, increasing trend, 2 calling it blocker
3062. **Respond to ProductX competitive threat** - TechStart evaluating switch
307
308### Product Opportunities
3091. **Real-time dashboards** - Strong demand (7 mentions), no roadmap coverage, competitive gap
3102. **Automated reporting** - Clear pain point, affects multiple workflows
311
312### Customer Follow-Ups
3131. **TechStart (Mike)** - At-risk due to ProductX evaluation, needs reporting solution
3142. **Acme Corp (Sarah)** - Consistent high-value feedback, strong champion, engage on roadmap
315
316---
317
318## 📊 Summary
319
320**High-urgency items:** 3
321**Feature requests:** 12 unique requests
322**Competitive threats:** 2 mentions
323**Customers needing follow-up:** 2
324
325**Top 3 insights:**
3261. **Reporting pain is accelerating** - Went from background complaint to blocker status
3272. **ProductX emerging as competitive threat** - New mentions this month, dashboard focus
3283. **Mobile performance preventing adoption** - 3 customers, but already on roadmap
329```