Docs Update

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ask user whether to skip.

Critical Purpose: Ensure ALL documentation stays in sync with code changes — project docs, business feature docs, and AI companions.

External Memory: For complex or lengthy work (research, analysis, scan, review), write intermediate findings and final results to a report file in plans/reports/ — prevents context loss and serves as deliverable.

Evidence Gate: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST — every claim, finding, and recommendation requires file:line proof or traced evidence with confidence percentage (>80% to act, <80% must verify first).

Quick Summary

Goal: Detect which documentation categories are impacted by recent code changes and update them accordingly.

Workflow:

1. Phase 0: Triage — git diff to categorize what changed and which doc types are impacted
2. Phase 1: Project Docs — Update project-level docs (README, project-structure-reference, etc.) if impacted
3. Phase 2: Business Feature Docs — Detect affected modules, update existing feature docs in docs/business-features/
4. Phase 3: Summary Report — What was checked, updated, and skipped

Key Rules:

• NEVER create new business feature docs from scratch — only update existing ones
• Fast exit when no documentation is impacted (e.g., only .claude/ config changes)
• Always report what was checked, even if nothing needed updating

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Phase 0: Triage — Detect Impacted Documentation

Step 0.1: Collect Changed Files

1. Run git diff --name-only HEAD (captures both staged and unstaged changes)
2. If no uncommitted changes, run git diff --name-only HEAD~1 (last commit)
3. If still empty, run git diff --name-only origin/develop...HEAD (branch changes)

Step 0.2: Categorize Changes

Classify each changed file into documentation impact categories:

Step 0.3: Fast Exit Check

If ALL changed files fall into the none category (e.g., only .claude/, .github/, root config files):

• Report: "No documentation impacted by current changes (config/tooling only)."
• Exit early — skip Phase 1 and Phase 2.

Phase 1: Project Documentation Update

When to run: Changed files include src/{Framework}/**, docs/**, or architectural changes.

When to skip: Only service-layer or frontend feature files changed (no architectural impact). Skip and proceed to Phase 2.

Step 1.1: Spawn Scouts (standalone invocation only)

When invoked standalone (not as a workflow step), spawn scouts for broad codebase context:

1. Spawn 2-4 scout-external (preferred) or scout (fallback) via Task tool
2. Target directories that actually exist — adapt to project structure
3. Merge scout results into context summary

When invoked as a workflow step: Skip scouting — use git diff context from Phase 0 directly.

Step 1.2: Update Project Docs

Pass context to docs-manager agent to update impacted project docs:

• docs/project-reference/project-structure-reference.md: Update if service architecture or cross-service patterns changed
• README.md: Update if project scope or setup changed (keep under 300 lines)

Only update docs that are directly impacted by the changes. Do not regenerate all docs.

Phase 2: Business Feature Documentation Update

This phase replaces the need to invoke /feature-docs separately for update scenarios. docs-update handles the full update lifecycle: detection → analysis → update → verification. Only invoke /feature-docs directly when creating new feature docs from scratch.

When to run: Changed files match src/Services/**, {frontend-apps-dir}/**, {frontend-libs-dir}/{domain-lib}/**, or {legacy-frontend-dir}/**Client/**.

When to skip: No service-layer or frontend feature files changed. Report: "No business feature docs impacted."

Step 2.1: Auto-Detect Affected Modules

Extract unique module names from changed file paths:

Build project-specific mapping by examining:

ls -d src/Services/*/
ls -d docs/business-features/*/

Step 2.2: Check Existing Docs

For each detected module:

1. Check if docs/business-features/{Module}/ exists
2. Check if docs/business-features/{Module}/detailed-features/ has feature docs
3. If docs exist → proceed to Step 2.3 (update mode)
4. If no docs exist → report: "Module {Module} has no feature docs. Consider running /feature-docs to create them." and skip

Step 2.3: Diff Analysis

1. Categorize changes by type: backend entity, command, query, frontend component, i18n, etc.
2. Map each change to impacted documentation sections using the table below

Step 2.4: Section Impact Mapping

Step 2.5: Update Impacted Sections

For each module with existing docs:

1. Read the existing feature doc (README.{FeatureName}.md)
2. Update ONLY the sections identified in Step 2.4
3. Mandatory test coverage — when documenting new functionality, MUST update:
   • Section 17 (Test Specifications): Add TC-{MOD}-XXX test cases with GIVEN/WHEN/THEN
   • Section 18 (Test Data): Add seed data for new test cases
   • Section 19 (Edge Cases): Add boundary conditions and error states
   • Section 20 (Regression Impact): Add regression risk rows
4. Update Section 26 (Version History) with new version entry
5. Add CHANGELOG entry under [Unreleased] following Keep a Changelog format

Step 2.6: AI Companion Sync

If README.{FeatureName}.ai.md exists alongside the updated feature doc:

• Update the AI companion to reflect changes (keep 300-500 lines)
• Update Last synced timestamp

Step 2.7: Verification (Mandatory)

After updating feature docs, run a verification pass on all changed sections:

1. Evidence audit — Every test case (TC-{MOD}-XXX) MUST have file:line evidence. Read the claimed file at the claimed line and verify the code supports the assertion. Fix immediately if wrong.
2. Domain model check — Verify entity properties, types, and enum values against actual source code. Remove anything not found in source.
3. Cross-reference audit — Test Summary counts match actual TC count. No template placeholders remain ({FilePath}, {LineRange}). All internal links resolve.

If verification finds hallucinated or stale content → fix before completing Phase 2.

Step 2.8: TC Coverage Cross-Reference

After updating feature docs, cross-reference integration test TC codes against doc TC codes:

1. Use the Grep tool to find all [Trait("TestSpec", ...)] in the affected service's integration test project:

   Grep pattern="Trait\(\"TestSpec\"" path="src/Services/{ServiceDir}/{Service}.IntegrationTests" glob="*.cs"
   

2. Use the Grep tool to find all TC-{MOD}-XXX in the affected feature doc Section 17 / test-specs doc:

   Grep pattern="TC-[A-Z]{2,}-[0-9]+" path="docs/business-features/{Module}/detailed-features" glob="*.md"
   

3. Compare the TC codes found:
   • TC in docs but no Trait in code → flag as Status: Untested in the doc
   • Trait in code but no TC in docs → add TC entry to the feature doc Section 17
4. Report discrepancies in the Phase 3 Summary Report

Decision: When docs-update Handles It vs. When to Recommend /feature-docs

Phase 3: Summary Report

Always output a summary of what happened:

### Documentation Update Summary

**Triage:** {N} files changed → {categories detected}

**Project Docs:**
- {Updated/Skipped}: {reason}

**Business Feature Docs:**
- Module {X}: {Updated sections A, B, C / No existing docs / Not impacted}
- Module {Y}: {Updated sections D, E / Skipped: no feature docs}

**Recommendations:**
- {Any new docs that should be created}
- {Any stale docs flagged but not auto-fixed}

Additional Requests

Next Steps

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST after completing this skill, use AskUserQuestion to recommend:

• "/watzup (Recommended)" — Wrap up session and check for remaining doc staleness
• "/review-changes" — Review all changes before commit
• "Skip, continue manually" — user decides

Closing Reminders

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST validate decisions with user via AskUserQuestion — never auto-decide. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST add a final review todo task to verify work quality.