Finalize

Finalize Implementation

Post-implementation QA workflow: tests, code polishing, commit, and self-improvement.

Task Tracking

At the start, use update_plan to track each phase:

1. Run $polish-code skill
2. Run $simplify-docs skill
3. Run $update-changelog skill
4. Run $self-improve skill
5. Ship It

Phase 1: Run $polish-code Skill

Run the $polish-code skill for the current changes.

Phase 2: Run $simplify-docs Skill

Run the $simplify-docs skill on the staged changes (git diff --cached). Stage any edits it makes before continuing.

Phase 3: Run $update-changelog Skill

Run the $update-changelog skill.

Phase 4: Run $self-improve Skill

Run the $self-improve skill for the current session. Always run this phase even if the session seemed routine.

Phase 5: Ship It

Step 1: Analyze Split

Examine the staged changes and evaluate whether they should be split into multiple commits, branches, and PRs for reviewability.

Detect the repository's default branch via gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name'. Check the current branch name and whether a PR already exists for it using gh pr view. If a PR exists, read its title and description to understand the branch's purpose. This context informs which changes belong on the current branch and which should be split off.

Run git diff --cached --stat and git diff --cached to understand the scope. Categorize changes along three dimensions:

• Concern type: refactoring, bug fix, new feature, cleanup, dependency update
• Layer/domain: backend, frontend, database migrations, i18n, tests, configuration
• Logical unit: files that form a coherent, independently reviewable change

A split is warranted when the staged changes contain multiple reviewable units. Each unit should be independently understandable, testable, and revertable. When deciding group boundaries, consider whether a reviewer could evaluate each group without needing context from the others.

Step 2: Present Analysis and Choose Path

Output the split analysis as text.

If changes form a single cohesive unit, note this and run the $ship skill.

If changes span multiple reviewable units, propose an ordered list of groups. For each group, specify:

• Name and one-line description
• File list (flag files with mixed-concern hunks)
• Branch topology: stacked on the previous group (when this group depends on it) or independent (when it can stand alone)

Use request_user_input to let the user choose: ship as a single commit/PR, or split.

• Ship — run the $ship skill
• Split — run the $split-and-ship skill

Then update or check the active plan and proceed to any remaining task.

Rules

• Diff size, number of files changed, passing tests, perceived user urgency, or context window concerns are not reasons to skip a phase. Each phase does work beyond what those signals cover. "The session was long" or "a prior phase was thorough" are never valid reasons to skip a later phase.
• Never stage or commit files containing secrets (.env, credentials, API keys). Warn if detected.
• Do not present diffs to the user — the user reviews diffs in an external git client. Use git diff internally as needed.
• If a non-test step fails (polish, review), stop and report the failure. Do not skip ahead.