Assess and improve typography that feels generic, inconsistent, or poorly structured — turning default-looking text into intentional, well-crafted type.
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Use the i-frontend-design skill — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run teach-impeccable first.
Assess Current Typography
Analyze what's weak or generic about the current type:
Font choices:
- Are we using invisible defaults? (Inter, Roboto, Arial, Open Sans, system defaults)
- Does the font match the brand personality? (A playful brand shouldn't use a corporate typeface)
- Are there too many font families? (More than 2-3 is almost always a mess)
Hierarchy:
- Can you tell headings from body from captions at a glance?
- Are font sizes too close together? (14px, 15px, 16px = muddy hierarchy)
- Are weight contrasts strong enough? (Medium vs Regular is barely visible)
Sizing & scale:
- Is there a consistent type scale, or are sizes arbitrary?
- Does body text meet minimum readability? (16px+)
- Is fluid sizing used, or do sizes jump at breakpoints?
Readability:
- Are line lengths comfortable? (45-75 characters ideal)
- Is line-height appropriate for the font and context?
- Is there enough contrast between text and background?
Consistency:
- Are the same elements styled the same way throughout?
- Are font weights used consistently? (Not bold in one section, semibold in another for the same role)
- Is letter-spacing intentional or default everywhere?
CRITICAL: The goal isn't to make text "fancier" — it's to make it clearer, more readable, and more intentional. Good typography is invisible; bad typography is distracting.
Plan Typography Improvements
Consult the typography reference from the i-frontend-design skill for detailed guidance on scales, pairing, and loading strategies.
Create a systematic plan:
- Font selection: Do fonts need replacing? What fits the brand/context?
- Type scale: Establish a modular scale (e.g., 1.25 ratio) with clear hierarchy
- Weight strategy: Which weights serve which roles? (Regular for body, Semibold for labels, Bold for headings — or whatever fits)
- Spacing: Line-heights, letter-spacing, and margins between typographic elements
Improve Typography Systematically
Font Selection
If fonts need replacing:
- Choose fonts that reflect the brand personality
- Pair with genuine contrast (serif + sans, geometric + humanist) — or use a single family in multiple weights
- Ensure web font loading doesn't cause layout shift (
font-display: swap, metric-matched fallbacks)
Establish Hierarchy
Build a clear type scale:
- 5 sizes cover most needs: caption, secondary, body, subheading, heading
- Use a consistent ratio between levels (1.25, 1.333, or 1.5)
- Combine dimensions: Size + weight + color + space for strong hierarchy — don't rely on size alone
- Use fluid sizing:
clamp(min, preferred, max) for smooth scaling
Fix Readability
- Set
max-width on text containers using ch units (max-width: 65ch)
- Adjust line-height per context: tighter for headings (1.1-1.2), looser for body (1.5-1.7)
- Increase line-height slightly for light-on-dark text
- Ensure body text is at least 16px / 1rem
Refine Details
- Use
tabular-nums for data tables and numbers that should align
- Apply proper
letter-spacing: slightly open for small caps and uppercase, default or tight for large display text
- Use semantic token names (
--text-body, --text-heading), not value names (--font-16)
- Set
font-kerning: normal and consider OpenType features where appropriate
Weight Consistency
- Define clear roles for each weight and stick to them
- Don't use more than 3-4 weights (Regular, Medium, Semibold, Bold is plenty)
- Load only the weights you actually use (each weight adds to page load)
NEVER:
- Use more than 2-3 font families
- Pick sizes arbitrarily — commit to a scale
- Set body text below 16px
- Use decorative/display fonts for body text
- Disable browser zoom (
user-scalable=no)
- Use
px for font sizes — use rem to respect user settings
- Default to Inter/Roboto/Open Sans when personality matters
- Pair fonts that are similar but not identical (two geometric sans-serifs)
Verify Typography Improvements
- Hierarchy: Can you identify heading vs body vs caption instantly?
- Readability: Is body text comfortable to read in long passages?
- Consistency: Are same-role elements styled identically throughout?
- Personality: Does the typography reflect the brand?
- Performance: Are web fonts loading efficiently without layout shift?
- Accessibility: Does text meet WCAG contrast ratios? Is it zoomable to 200%?
Remember: Typography is the foundation of interface design — it carries the majority of information. Getting it right is the highest-leverage improvement you can make.
1---2name: i-typeset3description: Improve typography by fixing font choices, hierarchy, sizing, weight consistency, and readability. Makes text feel intentional and polished.4---5
6Assess and improve typography that feels generic, inconsistent, or poorly structured — turning default-looking text into intentional, well-crafted type.
7
8## MANDATORY PREPARATION
9
10Use the i-frontend-design skill — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run teach-impeccable first.
11
12---
13
14## Assess Current Typography
15
16Analyze what's weak or generic about the current type:
17
181. **Font choices**:
19 - Are we using invisible defaults? (Inter, Roboto, Arial, Open Sans, system defaults)
20 - Does the font match the brand personality? (A playful brand shouldn't use a corporate typeface)
21 - Are there too many font families? (More than 2-3 is almost always a mess)
22
232. **Hierarchy**:
24 - Can you tell headings from body from captions at a glance?
25 - Are font sizes too close together? (14px, 15px, 16px = muddy hierarchy)
26 - Are weight contrasts strong enough? (Medium vs Regular is barely visible)
27
283. **Sizing & scale**:
29 - Is there a consistent type scale, or are sizes arbitrary?
30 - Does body text meet minimum readability? (16px+)
31 - Is fluid sizing used, or do sizes jump at breakpoints?
32
334. **Readability**:
34 - Are line lengths comfortable? (45-75 characters ideal)
35 - Is line-height appropriate for the font and context?
36 - Is there enough contrast between text and background?
37
385. **Consistency**:
39 - Are the same elements styled the same way throughout?
40 - Are font weights used consistently? (Not bold in one section, semibold in another for the same role)
41 - Is letter-spacing intentional or default everywhere?
42
43**CRITICAL**: The goal isn't to make text "fancier" — it's to make it clearer, more readable, and more intentional. Good typography is invisible; bad typography is distracting.
44
45## Plan Typography Improvements
46
47Consult the [typography reference](reference/typography.md) from the i-frontend-design skill for detailed guidance on scales, pairing, and loading strategies.
48
49Create a systematic plan:
50
51- **Font selection**: Do fonts need replacing? What fits the brand/context?
52- **Type scale**: Establish a modular scale (e.g., 1.25 ratio) with clear hierarchy
53- **Weight strategy**: Which weights serve which roles? (Regular for body, Semibold for labels, Bold for headings — or whatever fits)
54- **Spacing**: Line-heights, letter-spacing, and margins between typographic elements
55
56## Improve Typography Systematically
57
58### Font Selection
59
60If fonts need replacing:
61- Choose fonts that reflect the brand personality
62- Pair with genuine contrast (serif + sans, geometric + humanist) — or use a single family in multiple weights
63- Ensure web font loading doesn't cause layout shift (`font-display: swap`, metric-matched fallbacks)
64
65### Establish Hierarchy
66
67Build a clear type scale:
68- **5 sizes cover most needs**: caption, secondary, body, subheading, heading
69- **Use a consistent ratio** between levels (1.25, 1.333, or 1.5)
70- **Combine dimensions**: Size + weight + color + space for strong hierarchy — don't rely on size alone
71- **Use fluid sizing**: `clamp(min, preferred, max)` for smooth scaling
72
73### Fix Readability
74
75- Set `max-width` on text containers using `ch` units (`max-width: 65ch`)
76- Adjust line-height per context: tighter for headings (1.1-1.2), looser for body (1.5-1.7)
77- Increase line-height slightly for light-on-dark text
78- Ensure body text is at least 16px / 1rem
79
80### Refine Details
81
82- Use `tabular-nums` for data tables and numbers that should align
83- Apply proper `letter-spacing`: slightly open for small caps and uppercase, default or tight for large display text
84- Use semantic token names (`--text-body`, `--text-heading`), not value names (`--font-16`)
85- Set `font-kerning: normal` and consider OpenType features where appropriate
86
87### Weight Consistency
88
89- Define clear roles for each weight and stick to them
90- Don't use more than 3-4 weights (Regular, Medium, Semibold, Bold is plenty)
91- Load only the weights you actually use (each weight adds to page load)
92
93**NEVER**:
94- Use more than 2-3 font families
95- Pick sizes arbitrarily — commit to a scale
96- Set body text below 16px
97- Use decorative/display fonts for body text
98- Disable browser zoom (`user-scalable=no`)
99- Use `px` for font sizes — use `rem` to respect user settings
100- Default to Inter/Roboto/Open Sans when personality matters
101- Pair fonts that are similar but not identical (two geometric sans-serifs)
102
103## Verify Typography Improvements
104
105- **Hierarchy**: Can you identify heading vs body vs caption instantly?
106- **Readability**: Is body text comfortable to read in long passages?
107- **Consistency**: Are same-role elements styled identically throughout?
108- **Personality**: Does the typography reflect the brand?
109- **Performance**: Are web fonts loading efficiently without layout shift?
110- **Accessibility**: Does text meet WCAG contrast ratios? Is it zoomable to 200%?
111
112Remember: Typography is the foundation of interface design — it carries the majority of information. Getting it right is the highest-leverage improvement you can make.