name: incident-management
description: >-
End-to-end incident management lifecycle including classification frameworks,
escalation procedures, root cause analysis, metrics tracking (MTTD/MTTR/MTTC),
crisis communication, timeline reconstruction, lessons learned, severity matrices,
stakeholder notification, documentation standards, war room coordination, and
incident trend analysis aligned with NIST SP 800-61 and ISO 27035.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: incident-management
tags:
- incident-response
- incident-management
- classification
- escalation
- root-cause-analysis
- crisis-communication
- severity-matrix
- war-room
- lessons-learned
- metrics
- nist-800-61
- iso-27035
version: "1.0"
author: defconxt
license: AGPL-3.0
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and any agentskills.io-compatible agent.
metadata:
mitre-attack: ["TA0001", "TA0002", "TA0003", "TA0005", "TA0010", "TA0040"]
nist-csf: ["RS.RP-1", "RS.CO-1", "RS.AN-1", "RS.MI-1", "RS.IM-1", "RC.RP-1"]
frameworks: ["NIST SP 800-61", "ISO 27035", "SANS PICERL", "ITIL Incident Management"]
Incident Management
When to Use
Activate when the operator asks about incident classification, escalation workflows,
root cause analysis, crisis communication, severity assessment, war room procedures,
stakeholder notification, incident documentation, metrics tracking, lessons learned,
or incident trend analysis.
Mode: [MODE: INCIDENT] primary; [MODE: BLUE] for detection-to-incident handoff;
[MODE: ARCHITECT] for process design.
Quick Reference
| Task |
Framework / Tool |
Context |
| Classify incident |
NIST 800-61 Category + Functional Impact |
Triage |
| Assign severity |
Severity matrix (S1–S4) |
Triage |
| Escalation path |
Tiered escalation with SLA timers |
Response |
| Root cause analysis |
5 Whys, Ishikawa, Fault Tree |
Post-incident |
| Timeline reconstruction |
Log correlation + visual timeline |
Investigation |
| Crisis communication |
Templated stakeholder notifications |
Communication |
| War room coordination |
Structured roles + cadence |
Active incident |
| Lessons learned |
Blameless retrospective framework |
Post-incident |
| Metrics tracking |
MTTD, MTTR, MTTC, recurrence rate |
Continuous |
| Trend analysis |
Category/severity trends over time |
Strategic |
Workflow
1. Incident Lifecycle (NIST SP 800-61)
PREPARATION
├── Classification framework defined (category + severity)
├── Escalation procedures documented and tested
├── Communication templates ready
├── War room procedures established
└── Roles and responsibilities assigned
DETECTION & ANALYSIS
├── Alert triage → incident declaration
├── Severity assignment via matrix
├── Timeline reconstruction begins
├── Stakeholder notification per severity
└── Documentation starts immediately
CONTAINMENT, ERADICATION & RECOVERY
├── War room activated (S1/S2)
├── Containment strategy selected (short-term / long-term)
├── Eradication of threat actor presence
├── Recovery and service restoration
└── Continuous documentation and status updates
POST-INCIDENT ACTIVITY
├── Root cause analysis (5 Whys, Ishikawa)
├── Lessons learned / blameless retrospective
├── Metrics capture (MTTD, MTTR, MTTC)
├── Detection gap remediation
├── Trend analysis update
└── Process improvements implemented
2. Severity Matrix
| Severity |
Impact |
Examples |
Response SLA |
| S1 — Critical |
Business-threatening, data breach, total service loss |
Ransomware, active data exfil, prod down |
15 min response, 1 hr containment |
| S2 — High |
Significant impact, partial service loss |
Compromised admin account, partial outage |
30 min response, 4 hr containment |
| S3 — Medium |
Limited impact, no data loss |
Malware on single host, phishing success |
2 hr response, 24 hr resolution |
| S4 — Low |
Minimal impact, policy violation |
Failed brute force, policy exception |
8 hr response, 72 hr resolution |
3. Escalation Tiers
TIER 1 — SOC Analyst (0-15 min)
├── Initial triage and classification
├── Severity assignment
├── Stakeholder notification (S1/S2 immediate)
└── Escalate if: confirmed malicious, scope unclear, S1/S2
TIER 2 — Incident Lead (15-60 min)
├── Assume incident command
├── Activate war room (S1/S2)
├── Coordinate containment
└── Escalate if: business impact, legal/regulatory trigger
TIER 3 — CISO / Executive (as needed)
├── Business decisions (pay/don't pay, disclose/don't)
├── Regulatory notification authorization
├── External communication approval
└── Resource allocation
4. Metrics Framework
Operational Metrics:
├── MTTD: Mean Time to Detect — alert to declaration
├── MTTR: Mean Time to Respond — declaration to containment
├── MTTC: Mean Time to Close — declaration to resolution
├── MTTRE: Mean Time to Remediate — RCA finding to fix deployed
├── Recurrence Rate: incidents reopened / total incidents
└── Escalation Accuracy: correct severity at declaration
Process Metrics:
├── Documentation Completeness: required fields filled %
├── Lessons Learned Completion: retros held within SLA %
├── Action Item Closure Rate: retro actions completed on time %
└── Communication SLA: stakeholder updates sent within SLA %
Trend Metrics:
├── Incidents by category (monthly)
├── Incidents by severity (monthly)
├── Top 5 root causes (quarterly)
├── Repeat incident rate (quarterly)
└── Detection coverage improvement (quarterly)
5. Communication Templates
INITIAL NOTIFICATION (S1/S2):
Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] {Severity} — {Short Description}
Body:
Status: ACTIVE
Severity: {S1|S2|S3|S4}
Impact: {description of business impact}
Current Actions: {what is being done now}
Next Update: {time of next scheduled update}
Incident Commander: {name}
War Room: {link/location}
STATUS UPDATE:
Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] UPDATE #{n} — {Status}
Body:
Status: {ACTIVE|CONTAINED|ERADICATED|RESOLVED}
Changes Since Last Update: {what changed}
Current Actions: {what is being done now}
Next Update: {time}
RESOLUTION NOTIFICATION:
Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] RESOLVED — {Short Description}
Body:
Status: RESOLVED
Duration: {total time from declaration to resolution}
Root Cause: {brief summary}
Impact Summary: {systems/users affected}
Lessons Learned Review: {scheduled date}
Techniques
| Technique |
Description |
| implementing-incident-classification-framework |
Define category taxonomy and functional impact ratings |
| building-incident-escalation-procedures |
Tiered escalation with SLA timers and decision trees |
| performing-root-cause-analysis |
5 Whys, Ishikawa, and Fault Tree methods |
| implementing-incident-metrics-tracking |
MTTD/MTTR/MTTC dashboards and KPIs |
| building-crisis-communication-plans |
Stakeholder templates and communication cadence |
| performing-incident-timeline-reconstruction |
Multi-source log correlation and visual timelines |
| implementing-lessons-learned-processes |
Blameless retrospective framework and action tracking |
| building-incident-severity-matrices |
Multi-factor severity scoring and SLA mapping |
| performing-stakeholder-notification |
Automated notification routing and regulatory compliance |
| implementing-incident-documentation-standards |
Structured templates and completeness validation |
| building-war-room-procedures |
Role assignments, cadence, and coordination protocols |
| performing-incident-trend-analysis |
Statistical trend detection and forecasting |
Verification
1---2name: incident-management-43description: <!-- Copyright (c) 2026 defconxt. All rights reserved. -->4---5
6<!-- Copyright (c) 2026 defconxt. All rights reserved. -->
7<!-- Licensed under AGPL-3.0 — see LICENSE file for details. -->
8<!-- CIPHER is a trademark of defconxt. -->
9---
10name: incident-management
11description: >-
12 End-to-end incident management lifecycle including classification frameworks,
13 escalation procedures, root cause analysis, metrics tracking (MTTD/MTTR/MTTC),
14 crisis communication, timeline reconstruction, lessons learned, severity matrices,
15 stakeholder notification, documentation standards, war room coordination, and
16 incident trend analysis aligned with NIST SP 800-61 and ISO 27035.
17domain: cybersecurity
18subdomain: incident-management
19tags:
20 - incident-response
21 - incident-management
22 - classification
23 - escalation
24 - root-cause-analysis
25 - crisis-communication
26 - severity-matrix
27 - war-room
28 - lessons-learned
29 - metrics
30 - nist-800-61
31 - iso-27035
32version: "1.0"
33author: defconxt
34license: AGPL-3.0
35compatibility: Designed for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and any agentskills.io-compatible agent.
36metadata:
37 mitre-attack: ["TA0001", "TA0002", "TA0003", "TA0005", "TA0010", "TA0040"]
38 nist-csf: ["RS.RP-1", "RS.CO-1", "RS.AN-1", "RS.MI-1", "RS.IM-1", "RC.RP-1"]
39 frameworks: ["NIST SP 800-61", "ISO 27035", "SANS PICERL", "ITIL Incident Management"]
40---
41
42# Incident Management
43
44## When to Use
45
46Activate when the operator asks about incident classification, escalation workflows,
47root cause analysis, crisis communication, severity assessment, war room procedures,
48stakeholder notification, incident documentation, metrics tracking, lessons learned,
49or incident trend analysis.
50
51Mode: `[MODE: INCIDENT]` primary; `[MODE: BLUE]` for detection-to-incident handoff;
52`[MODE: ARCHITECT]` for process design.
53
54## Quick Reference
55
56| Task | Framework / Tool | Context |
57|------|-----------------|---------|
58| Classify incident | NIST 800-61 Category + Functional Impact | Triage |
59| Assign severity | Severity matrix (S1–S4) | Triage |
60| Escalation path | Tiered escalation with SLA timers | Response |
61| Root cause analysis | 5 Whys, Ishikawa, Fault Tree | Post-incident |
62| Timeline reconstruction | Log correlation + visual timeline | Investigation |
63| Crisis communication | Templated stakeholder notifications | Communication |
64| War room coordination | Structured roles + cadence | Active incident |
65| Lessons learned | Blameless retrospective framework | Post-incident |
66| Metrics tracking | MTTD, MTTR, MTTC, recurrence rate | Continuous |
67| Trend analysis | Category/severity trends over time | Strategic |
68
69## Workflow
70
71### 1. Incident Lifecycle (NIST SP 800-61)
72
73```
74PREPARATION
75├── Classification framework defined (category + severity)
76├── Escalation procedures documented and tested
77├── Communication templates ready
78├── War room procedures established
79└── Roles and responsibilities assigned
80
81DETECTION & ANALYSIS
82├── Alert triage → incident declaration
83├── Severity assignment via matrix
84├── Timeline reconstruction begins
85├── Stakeholder notification per severity
86└── Documentation starts immediately
87
88CONTAINMENT, ERADICATION & RECOVERY
89├── War room activated (S1/S2)
90├── Containment strategy selected (short-term / long-term)
91├── Eradication of threat actor presence
92├── Recovery and service restoration
93└── Continuous documentation and status updates
94
95POST-INCIDENT ACTIVITY
96├── Root cause analysis (5 Whys, Ishikawa)
97├── Lessons learned / blameless retrospective
98├── Metrics capture (MTTD, MTTR, MTTC)
99├── Detection gap remediation
100├── Trend analysis update
101└── Process improvements implemented
102```
103
104### 2. Severity Matrix
105
106| Severity | Impact | Examples | Response SLA |
107|----------|--------|----------|-------------|
108| **S1 — Critical** | Business-threatening, data breach, total service loss | Ransomware, active data exfil, prod down | 15 min response, 1 hr containment |
109| **S2 — High** | Significant impact, partial service loss | Compromised admin account, partial outage | 30 min response, 4 hr containment |
110| **S3 — Medium** | Limited impact, no data loss | Malware on single host, phishing success | 2 hr response, 24 hr resolution |
111| **S4 — Low** | Minimal impact, policy violation | Failed brute force, policy exception | 8 hr response, 72 hr resolution |
112
113### 3. Escalation Tiers
114
115```
116TIER 1 — SOC Analyst (0-15 min)
117├── Initial triage and classification
118├── Severity assignment
119├── Stakeholder notification (S1/S2 immediate)
120└── Escalate if: confirmed malicious, scope unclear, S1/S2
121
122TIER 2 — Incident Lead (15-60 min)
123├── Assume incident command
124├── Activate war room (S1/S2)
125├── Coordinate containment
126└── Escalate if: business impact, legal/regulatory trigger
127
128TIER 3 — CISO / Executive (as needed)
129├── Business decisions (pay/don't pay, disclose/don't)
130├── Regulatory notification authorization
131├── External communication approval
132└── Resource allocation
133```
134
135### 4. Metrics Framework
136
137```
138Operational Metrics:
139├── MTTD: Mean Time to Detect — alert to declaration
140├── MTTR: Mean Time to Respond — declaration to containment
141├── MTTC: Mean Time to Close — declaration to resolution
142├── MTTRE: Mean Time to Remediate — RCA finding to fix deployed
143├── Recurrence Rate: incidents reopened / total incidents
144└── Escalation Accuracy: correct severity at declaration
145
146Process Metrics:
147├── Documentation Completeness: required fields filled %
148├── Lessons Learned Completion: retros held within SLA %
149├── Action Item Closure Rate: retro actions completed on time %
150└── Communication SLA: stakeholder updates sent within SLA %
151
152Trend Metrics:
153├── Incidents by category (monthly)
154├── Incidents by severity (monthly)
155├── Top 5 root causes (quarterly)
156├── Repeat incident rate (quarterly)
157└── Detection coverage improvement (quarterly)
158```
159
160### 5. Communication Templates
161
162```
163INITIAL NOTIFICATION (S1/S2):
164Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] {Severity} — {Short Description}
165Body:
166 Status: ACTIVE
167 Severity: {S1|S2|S3|S4}
168 Impact: {description of business impact}
169 Current Actions: {what is being done now}
170 Next Update: {time of next scheduled update}
171 Incident Commander: {name}
172 War Room: {link/location}
173
174STATUS UPDATE:
175Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] UPDATE #{n} — {Status}
176Body:
177 Status: {ACTIVE|CONTAINED|ERADICATED|RESOLVED}
178 Changes Since Last Update: {what changed}
179 Current Actions: {what is being done now}
180 Next Update: {time}
181
182RESOLUTION NOTIFICATION:
183Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] RESOLVED — {Short Description}
184Body:
185 Status: RESOLVED
186 Duration: {total time from declaration to resolution}
187 Root Cause: {brief summary}
188 Impact Summary: {systems/users affected}
189 Lessons Learned Review: {scheduled date}
190```
191
192## Techniques
193
194| Technique | Description |
195|-----------|------------|
196| [implementing-incident-classification-framework](techniques/implementing-incident-classification-framework/) | Define category taxonomy and functional impact ratings |
197| [building-incident-escalation-procedures](techniques/building-incident-escalation-procedures/) | Tiered escalation with SLA timers and decision trees |
198| [performing-root-cause-analysis](techniques/performing-root-cause-analysis/) | 5 Whys, Ishikawa, and Fault Tree methods |
199| [implementing-incident-metrics-tracking](techniques/implementing-incident-metrics-tracking/) | MTTD/MTTR/MTTC dashboards and KPIs |
200| [building-crisis-communication-plans](techniques/building-crisis-communication-plans/) | Stakeholder templates and communication cadence |
201| [performing-incident-timeline-reconstruction](techniques/performing-incident-timeline-reconstruction/) | Multi-source log correlation and visual timelines |
202| [implementing-lessons-learned-processes](techniques/implementing-lessons-learned-processes/) | Blameless retrospective framework and action tracking |
203| [building-incident-severity-matrices](techniques/building-incident-severity-matrices/) | Multi-factor severity scoring and SLA mapping |
204| [performing-stakeholder-notification](techniques/performing-stakeholder-notification/) | Automated notification routing and regulatory compliance |
205| [implementing-incident-documentation-standards](techniques/implementing-incident-documentation-standards/) | Structured templates and completeness validation |
206| [building-war-room-procedures](techniques/building-war-room-procedures/) | Role assignments, cadence, and coordination protocols |
207| [performing-incident-trend-analysis](techniques/performing-incident-trend-analysis/) | Statistical trend detection and forecasting |
208
209## Verification
210
211- [ ] Classification framework covers all NIST 800-61 categories
212- [ ] Severity matrix validated with business stakeholders
213- [ ] Escalation procedures tested via tabletop exercise
214- [ ] Communication templates approved by legal and PR
215- [ ] Metrics dashboard operational (MTTD, MTTR, MTTC)
216- [ ] Lessons learned process running for all S1/S2 incidents
217- [ ] War room procedures exercised quarterly
218- [ ] Incident documentation completeness > 90%
219- [ ] Trend analysis reviewed monthly by leadership