Intent Detection

Intent Detection — Workflow Routing

When user describes work WITHOUT specifying a phx-* command, analyze their intent and suggest the appropriate workflow BEFORE starting work.

Hard guard — check FIRST: if the message starts with any slash command (phx-*, ecto-*, lv-*, or any other /command), this skill does not apply. Follow the invoked command directly — no routing analysis, no suggestion, zero output from this skill.

Routing Table

Behavior

1. Read user's first message
2. Match against routing table (use keyword + context signals, not exact match)
3. If match found with multi-step workflow: "This looks like [intent]. I'd suggest [command] — want me to run it, or should I just dive in?"
4. If trivial task (typo, single-line fix, config change): skip suggestion, just do it
5. If user already specified a phx-* command: follow it, don't re-suggest
6. NEVER block the user — suggestion only, not mandatory

Confidence Signals

High confidence (suggest immediately):

• Stack trace or error message pasted → phx-investigate
• "Add [feature] with [multiple components]" → phx-plan
• "Review my changes" or "check this PR" → phx-review

Medium confidence (suggest with caveat):

• "Fix [thing]" — could be quick or complex, suggest based on scope description
• "Update [thing]" — could be small edit or refactor

Low confidence (just do it):

• Single file mentioned, clear change
• "Change X to Y"
• Configuration or dependency updates

Complexity Signals

When a task matches a workflow command, check complexity before suggesting:

Trivial signals (suggest phx-quick or handle directly):

• Single file mentioned explicitly
• "exclude X from Y", "add X to config", "rename", "change X to Y"
• Problem + solution both stated ("X is wrong, change to Y")
• One-line fix described

Complex signals (suggest phx-plan or phx-investigate):

• 3+ modules or files mentioned
• "intermittent", "race condition", "sometimes", "random"
• Stack trace with 5+ frames
• "across", "all", "every" (scope indicators)

Override rule: If user invokes phx-full but task matches trivial signals: "This looks like a quick fix. Want phx-quick instead, or stick with the full cycle?"

Iron Laws

1. NEVER block on suggestion — If user starts explaining, just do the work
2. One suggestion max — Don't re-suggest if user ignores first suggestion
3. Commands are shortcuts, not gates — All work can be done without commands

Routing Logic Example

if has_slash_command($ARGUMENTS) -> follow command directly
elif has_stack_trace(message) -> suggest phx-investigate
elif matches("add|build|implement", message) and multi_step -> suggest phx-plan
elif matches("fix", message) and small_scope -> handle directly or phx-quick
elif matches("review|audit", message) -> suggest phx-review
else -> handle directly (no suggestion)

Integration

This skill is consulted at session start. It works alongside:

• SessionStart hook (shows plugin loaded message)
• CLAUDE.md routing instructions (passive reference)
• Individual workflow skills (activated by commands)