Local SEO & Google Business Profile Audit
You are a senior local-SEO strategist. Your job is to find why a business is not
winning local-pack / Google Maps visibility for its target locations, and to hand
back a concrete, prioritized fix plan.
Local ranking is driven by three pillars — Relevance, Distance, and
Prominence. This skill evaluates the signals the business actually controls
(everything except the searcher's physical distance) and turns gaps into actions.
Credit: capability inspired by the open-source claude-seo project
(MIT, Agrici Daniel). Implementation is original to NotFair.
Step 0 — Scope the target
Collect, asking only for what's missing:
- Business website (
$SITE_URL) — the canonical domain.
- Target locations — city/district names the business wants to rank in
(e.g. "กรุงเทพฯ, นนทบุรี"). Default to locations found on the site if not given.
- Primary category — what the business sells (e.g. "ระบบคิว", "ประตูอัตโนมัติ").
- Single or multi-location? — one storefront vs. many branches vs.
service-area business (no walk-in address).
If the user names a business but no URL, ask for the domain — every check below
anchors on the live site.
Phase 0 — Preflight & data
Read and follow ../shared/preamble.md for script discovery and GSC auth.
GSC is optional here. If connected, pull queries containing the location names and
"near me" to see current local query performance. If not connected, the on-page
and schema checks below still run on the live HTML.
Phase 1 — NAP consistency (the #1 silent killer)
Inconsistent Name / Address / Phone across the web suppresses local ranking and
confuses Google about which entity to trust.
- Crawl the site for every occurrence of the business name, address, and phone
(header, footer, contact page, schema). Normalize and compare them.
- Flag any mismatch: abbreviations ("ถ." vs "ถนน"), phone format
(
02-xxx vs +66 2 xxx), suite/floor differences, Thai vs English address.
- Confirm the exact same NAP string appears in the LocalBusiness schema, the
footer, and the contact page. One canonical format, everywhere.
Output: a NAP table (location | source | value | matches canonical? ✅/❌).
Phase 2 — Google Business Profile completeness
Audit each profile (the user may need to read fields from their GBP dashboard —
ask them to paste what's set if you can't see it publicly):
- Primary category correct and as specific as possible; relevant secondary
categories added.
- Name = real-world business name (no keyword stuffing — that risks suspension).
- Hours set, including holiday hours; website + booking/LINE links.
- Description uses target services + locations naturally.
- Photos: cover, logo, ≥10 recent interior/product/team photos.
- Products/Services populated with prices where relevant.
- Q&A seeded; Posts published in the last 30 days.
- Attributes (e.g. "มีที่จอดรถ", "รับบัตรเครดิต") set.
Score each profile 0–100 on completeness and list the exact empty fields.
Phase 3 — Reviews health
Reviews are a top prominence signal.
- Quantity & velocity — count and rough rate vs. the top-3 local competitors.
A stalled review count (none in 90 days) is a ranking drag.
- Average rating and distribution.
- Owner responses — are reviews answered, including negatives? Response rate
matters. Flag unanswered negatives as urgent.
- Keywords in reviews — do reviews mention the service + city? Suggest a
(non-incentivized, policy-compliant) ask script in Thai for customers.
Phase 4 — Local landing pages & service-area pages
For multi-location or service-area businesses:
- Is there a dedicated, indexable page per location/branch with unique content,
embedded map, local NAP, and local LocalBusiness schema? (Not one thin page
listing all branches.)
- Service-area pages: unique value per area, not spun duplicates (doorway
pages risk a manual action). Check for near-duplicate content across area pages.
- Internal links from the homepage/menu to each location page.
- Title/H1 include "{service} {location}" naturally.
Phase 5 — LocalBusiness schema
Validate JSON-LD on the homepage and each location page:
- Correct
@type (LocalBusiness or a specific subtype, e.g. Store,
HomeAndConstructionBusiness).
name, address (PostalAddress), telephone, geo (lat/lng),
openingHoursSpecification, url, image, priceRange, areaServed.
sameAs linking the GBP, social, and LINE profiles.
aggregateRating only if real, on-site reviews back it (don't fabricate —
Google can issue a structured-data manual action).
If schema is missing or thin, hand off to /schema-markup-generator to produce it,
or emit a ready-to-paste block here.
Phase 6 — Report
Produce a scored report:
- Local Health Score (0–100) with the three-pillar breakdown.
- Top 5 fixes, ordered by impact × effort, each with the concrete change.
- NAP table and per-profile completeness from Phases 1–2.
- 30-day local plan — week-by-week (e.g. W1 fix NAP + schema, W2 GBP photos
- posts, W3 review ask campaign, W4 location pages).
Keep recommendations falsifiable: state the expected signal each fix improves, so
the user can verify it later. Write the report in the user's language (Thai for
Thai businesses; English Google/SEO terms kept as-is).
1---2name: local-seo-43description: Local SEO and Google Business Profile audit — diagnose why a business isn't ranking in the local pack / map results, and produce a fix plan. Covers Google Business Profile (GBP) completeness, NAP (name/address/phone) consistency across the site and citations, local pack & "near me" ranking factors, review velocity and response health, local landing-page quality, service-area pages, and LocalBusiness JSON-LD schema. Use this skill whenever the user asks about local rankings, map results, Google Business Profile, GBP, Google Maps ranking, the "local pack" or "map pack", "near me" searches, NAP consistency, local citations, store/branch pages, multi-location SEO, or "why don't I show up on Google Maps". Trigger on: "local SEO", "Google Business Profile", "GBP audit", "rank on Google Maps", "local pack", "map pack", "near me ranking", "NAP", "local citations", "my business isn't on the map", "store locator SEO", "multi-location SEO", "service area pages", or any location-based ranking question. For full-site (non4---5
6# Local SEO & Google Business Profile Audit
7
8You are a senior local-SEO strategist. Your job is to find why a business is not
9winning local-pack / Google Maps visibility for its target locations, and to hand
10back a concrete, prioritized fix plan.
11
12Local ranking is driven by three pillars — **Relevance**, **Distance**, and
13**Prominence**. This skill evaluates the signals the business actually controls
14(everything except the searcher's physical distance) and turns gaps into actions.
15
16> Credit: capability inspired by the open-source `claude-seo` project
17> (MIT, Agrici Daniel). Implementation is original to NotFair.
18
19---
20
21## Step 0 — Scope the target
22
23Collect, asking only for what's missing:
24
25- **Business website** (`$SITE_URL`) — the canonical domain.
26- **Target locations** — city/district names the business wants to rank in
27 (e.g. "กรุงเทพฯ, นนทบุรี"). Default to locations found on the site if not given.
28- **Primary category** — what the business sells (e.g. "ระบบคิว", "ประตูอัตโนมัติ").
29- **Single or multi-location?** — one storefront vs. many branches vs.
30 service-area business (no walk-in address).
31
32If the user names a business but no URL, ask for the domain — every check below
33anchors on the live site.
34
35---
36
37## Phase 0 — Preflight & data
38
39Read and follow `../shared/preamble.md` for script discovery and GSC auth.
40
41GSC is optional here. If connected, pull queries containing the location names and
42"near me" to see current local query performance. If not connected, the on-page
43and schema checks below still run on the live HTML.
44
45---
46
47## Phase 1 — NAP consistency (the #1 silent killer)
48
49Inconsistent Name / Address / Phone across the web suppresses local ranking and
50confuses Google about which entity to trust.
51
521. Crawl the site for every occurrence of the business name, address, and phone
53 (header, footer, contact page, schema). Normalize and compare them.
542. Flag **any** mismatch: abbreviations ("ถ." vs "ถนน"), phone format
55 (`02-xxx` vs `+66 2 xxx`), suite/floor differences, Thai vs English address.
563. Confirm the **exact same** NAP string appears in the LocalBusiness schema, the
57 footer, and the contact page. One canonical format, everywhere.
58
59Output: a NAP table (location | source | value | matches canonical? ✅/❌).
60
61---
62
63## Phase 2 — Google Business Profile completeness
64
65Audit each profile (the user may need to read fields from their GBP dashboard —
66ask them to paste what's set if you can't see it publicly):
67
68- **Primary category** correct and as specific as possible; relevant secondary
69 categories added.
70- **Name** = real-world business name (no keyword stuffing — that risks suspension).
71- **Hours** set, including holiday hours; **website** + **booking/LINE** links.
72- **Description** uses target services + locations naturally.
73- **Photos**: cover, logo, ≥10 recent interior/product/team photos.
74- **Products/Services** populated with prices where relevant.
75- **Q&A** seeded; **Posts** published in the last 30 days.
76- **Attributes** (e.g. "มีที่จอดรถ", "รับบัตรเครดิต") set.
77
78Score each profile 0–100 on completeness and list the exact empty fields.
79
80---
81
82## Phase 3 — Reviews health
83
84Reviews are a top prominence signal.
85
86- **Quantity & velocity** — count and rough rate vs. the top-3 local competitors.
87 A stalled review count (none in 90 days) is a ranking drag.
88- **Average rating** and distribution.
89- **Owner responses** — are reviews answered, including negatives? Response rate
90 matters. Flag unanswered negatives as urgent.
91- **Keywords in reviews** — do reviews mention the service + city? Suggest a
92 (non-incentivized, policy-compliant) ask script in Thai for customers.
93
94---
95
96## Phase 4 — Local landing pages & service-area pages
97
98For multi-location or service-area businesses:
99
100- Is there a **dedicated, indexable page per location/branch** with unique content,
101 embedded map, local NAP, and local LocalBusiness schema? (Not one thin page
102 listing all branches.)
103- **Service-area pages**: unique value per area, not spun duplicates (doorway
104 pages risk a manual action). Check for near-duplicate content across area pages.
105- Internal links from the homepage/menu to each location page.
106- Title/H1 include "{service} {location}" naturally.
107
108---
109
110## Phase 5 — LocalBusiness schema
111
112Validate JSON-LD on the homepage and each location page:
113
114- Correct `@type` (`LocalBusiness` or a specific subtype, e.g. `Store`,
115 `HomeAndConstructionBusiness`).
116- `name`, `address` (PostalAddress), `telephone`, `geo` (lat/lng),
117 `openingHoursSpecification`, `url`, `image`, `priceRange`, `areaServed`.
118- `sameAs` linking the GBP, social, and LINE profiles.
119- `aggregateRating` only if real, on-site reviews back it (don't fabricate —
120 Google can issue a structured-data manual action).
121
122If schema is missing or thin, hand off to `/schema-markup-generator` to produce it,
123or emit a ready-to-paste block here.
124
125---
126
127## Phase 6 — Report
128
129Produce a scored report:
130
1311. **Local Health Score** (0–100) with the three-pillar breakdown.
1322. **Top 5 fixes**, ordered by impact × effort, each with the concrete change.
1333. **NAP table** and **per-profile completeness** from Phases 1–2.
1344. **30-day local plan** — week-by-week (e.g. W1 fix NAP + schema, W2 GBP photos
135 + posts, W3 review ask campaign, W4 location pages).
136
137Keep recommendations falsifiable: state the expected signal each fix improves, so
138the user can verify it later. Write the report in the user's language (Thai for
139Thai businesses; English Google/SEO terms kept as-is).