Log Classifier

Log Classifier Skill

You work by applying classification rules and pattern matching to identify log characteristics, then recommend the most appropriate type. You can also reclassify existing _untyped logs into specific types.

For new log classification:

• content - Log content (markdown or raw text)
• metadata - Optional metadata object (fields, keywords, source)
• context - Optional context (command executed, trigger event)

For reclassification:

• log_path - Path to existing log file
• force - If true, reclassify even if already typed

Example request:

{
  "operation": "classify-log",
  "content": "Test suite execution results: 45 passed, 3 failed...",
  "metadata": {
    "command": "pytest",
    "exit_code": 1,
    "duration": 12.5
  }
}

Step 2: Apply Classification Rules

Execute scripts/classify-log.sh with extracted signals:

Session Type Indicators

• Keywords: session, conversation, claude, user_prompt, issue_number
• Patterns: Session UUID, conversation structure, markdown with user/assistant markers
• Context: Claude Code session, interactive work

Build Type Indicators

• Keywords: build, compile, webpack, maven, gradle, npm, cargo
• Patterns: Build tool output, compiler errors, artifact paths
• Commands: npm run build, cargo build, mvn package
• Exit code present (0 or non-zero)

Deployment Type Indicators

• Keywords: deploy, release, production, staging, rollout, version
• Patterns: Environment names, semantic versions, deployment checksums
• Commands: terraform apply, kubectl apply, eb deploy, vercel deploy
• Critical: Environment field (production/staging)

Debug Type Indicators

• Keywords: debug, trace, error, exception, stack trace, breakpoint
• Patterns: Stack traces, error messages, line numbers
• Purpose: Troubleshooting, investigation, root cause analysis

Test Type Indicators

• Keywords: test, spec, suite, assertion, passed, failed, coverage
• Patterns: Test counts (X passed, Y failed), test framework names
• Commands: pytest, jest, mocha, rspec, go test
• Test metrics: duration, coverage percentages

Audit Type Indicators

• Keywords: audit, security, compliance, access, permission, unauthorized, inspect, inspection, validate, validation, verify, verification, review, assessment, examine, examination, findings
• Commands: audit, inspect, validate, verify, review, check
• Patterns: Audit reports (findings, violations, issues found), inspection results (inspected files, validated records, verified items)
• Metadata: user + action + resource (flexible: any 2 of 3 fields sufficient for bonus)
• Use cases: Security audits, compliance reviews, code inspections, data validation, quality assessments

Operational Type Indicators

• Keywords: maintenance, backup, restore, migration, sync, cleanup, cron
• Patterns: Operational metrics, scheduled tasks, system maintenance
• Commands: cron jobs, backup scripts, cleanup utilities
• Resource impact data

Changelog Type Indicators

• Keywords: changelog, release notes, version, breaking change, semver
• Patterns: Semantic version numbers (e.g., v1.2.3), Keep a Changelog sections
• Structure: Sections for Added/Changed/Deprecated/Removed/Fixed/Security
• Work items: PR references (#123), issue links
• Critical: version field in metadata

Workflow Type Indicators

• Keywords: workflow, pipeline, faber, operation, phase, lineage
• Patterns: FABER phases (Frame/Architect/Build/Evaluate/Release), ETL phases (Extract/Transform/Load)
• Structure: Operations timeline, decisions log, artifacts list
• Metadata: workflow_id, phase, work_item_id
• Lineage: upstream dependencies, downstream impacts
• Action verbs: processed, transformed, validated, executed, completed
• Critical: workflow_id or multiple FABER/ETL phases

_untyped Fallback

• Use when: No clear type match, confidence < 70%, truly ad-hoc content
• Always include: Suggestion for manual review

Step 3: Calculate Confidence Score

For each candidate type, score 0-100 based on:

• Keyword matches (30 points)
• Pattern matches (30 points)
• Metadata matches (25 points)
• Context matches (15 points)

Threshold: Recommend type if score >= 70

Step 4: Return Classification

Execute scripts/generate-recommendation.sh to format output:

High confidence (>= 90):

{
  "recommended_type": "test",
  "confidence": 95,
  "reasoning": "Strong indicators: pytest command, test counts, coverage metrics",
  "matched_patterns": ["test framework", "pass/fail counts", "duration"],
  "suggested_fields": {
    "test_id": "test-2025-11-16-001",
    "test_framework": "pytest",
    "total_tests": 48,
    "passed_tests": 45,
    "failed_tests": 3
  }
}

Medium confidence (70-89):

{
  "recommended_type": "operational",
  "confidence": 75,
  "reasoning": "Detected backup operation keywords and duration metrics",
  "alternative_types": ["_untyped"],
  "review_recommended": true
}

Low confidence (< 70):

{
  "recommended_type": "_untyped",
  "confidence": 45,
  "reasoning": "Insufficient patterns to classify confidently",
  "candidates": [
    {"type": "debug", "score": 45},
    {"type": "operational", "score": 38}
  ],
  "manual_review_required": true
}

📊 Classification Analysis: Signals detected:

• Keywords: {list}
• Patterns: {list}
• Commands: {list}

Type scores:

• test: 95 ✓ MATCH
• build: 45
• operational: 32
• _untyped: 20

✅ COMPLETED: Log Classifier Recommended type: test Confidence: 95% (high) Reasoning: {explanation} ─────────────────────────────────────── Next: Use log-writer to create typed log, or log-validator to verify structure

</OUTPUTS>

<DOCUMENTATION>
Write to execution log:
- Operation: classify-log
- Recommended type: {type}
- Confidence: {score}
- Alternative types: {list}
- Timestamp: ISO 8601
</DOCUMENTATION>

<ERROR_HANDLING>
**Empty content:**

❌ ERROR: No content provided for classification Provide either 'content' field or 'log_path' to existing file

**File not found (reclassification):**

❌ ERROR: Log file not found Path: {log_path} Cannot reclassify non-existent log

**Classification failed:**

⚠️ WARNING: Classification uncertain All type scores below confidence threshold (< 70) Defaulting to '_untyped' with manual review flag Suggestion: Add more context or metadata to improve classification

</ERROR_HANDLING>

## Scripts

This skill uses two supporting scripts:

1. **`scripts/classify-log.sh {content_file} {metadata_json}`**
   - Analyzes content and metadata for classification signals
   - Returns scored list of candidate types
   - Exits 0 always (classification uncertainty is not an error)

2. **`scripts/generate-recommendation.sh {scores_json}`**
   - Formats classification results as recommendation
   - Adds reasoning and suggested fields
   - Outputs JSON recommendation object