Persist

Intent

Execute persist to write stable learnings, decisions, and patterns to durable storage for future recall and consistency.

Success criteria:

• Content is written to the correct destination
• Existing content is preserved or properly merged
• New content follows established structure/format
• Metadata (timestamp, source) is recorded
• Write is verified successfully

Compatible schemas:

• schemas/output_schema.yaml

Inputs

Procedure

1. Validate content: Ensure content is appropriate for persistence

   • Check content is non-empty and meaningful
   • Verify content type classification
   • Ensure no sensitive data (credentials, PII) is being persisted
   • Validate content structure if object

2. Determine destination: Select where to write

   • CLAUDE.md: Project-level decisions and patterns
   • Specific file: Domain or feature-specific knowledge
   • auto: Choose based on content type and scope

3. Read existing content: Load current state of destination

   • Parse structure and sections
   • Identify target section for new content
   • Note existing entries to avoid duplicates

4. Check for duplicates/conflicts: Compare new vs existing

   • Exact duplicate: Skip or update timestamp only
   • Similar content: Flag for review
   • Contradiction: Stop and request clarification

5. Format new content: Structure for persistence

   • Add timestamp and source metadata
   • Format according to destination conventions
   • Include rationale if decision/pattern

6. Apply merge strategy:

   • append: Add to end of section
   • replace: Overwrite matching existing entry
   • merge: Intelligently combine with existing

7. Write to destination: Execute the write operation

   • Use Edit tool for file modifications
   • Preserve file formatting and structure
   • Add section headers if needed

8. Verify write: Confirm content was persisted correctly

   • Re-read destination file
   • Confirm new content present
   • Validate structure integrity

Output Contract

Return a structured object:

persisted:
  content_type: decision | pattern | fact | context
  content_id: string  # Unique identifier for this persisted item
  destination: string  # File path where content was written
  section: string | null  # Section within file
  timestamp: string  # ISO timestamp of persistence
write_operation:
  strategy: append | replace | merge
  bytes_written: integer
  lines_added: integer
  lines_modified: integer
verification:
  write_confirmed: boolean
  content_present: boolean
  structure_valid: boolean
metadata:
  source: string  # Where this knowledge came from
  related_entries: array[string]  # IDs of related persisted items
  expiry: string | null  # When this knowledge should be reviewed
duplicates_found:
  - existing_id: string
    similarity: number
    action_taken: skipped | updated | merged
confidence: number  # 0.0-1.0 based on write verification
evidence_anchors: array[string]  # References to verification
assumptions: array[string]  # Explicit assumptions

Field Definitions

Examples

Example 1: Persisting a Project Decision

Input:

content:
  decision: "Use PostgreSQL for all persistent storage"
  rationale: "Strong ACID guarantees, mature ecosystem, team familiarity"
  context: "Evaluated PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB for new backend service"
  constraints:
    - "Must support complex queries"
    - "Team has PostgreSQL experience"
destination: CLAUDE.md
section: "Architecture Decisions"
content_type: decision

Output:

persisted:
  content_type: decision
  content_id: "decision_db_20240116"
  destination: "CLAUDE.md"
  section: "Architecture Decisions"
  timestamp: "2024-01-16T10:00:00Z"
write_operation:
  strategy: append
  bytes_written: 256
  lines_added: 8
  lines_modified: 0
verification:
  write_confirmed: true
  content_present: true
  structure_valid: true
metadata:
  source: "conversation:conv_abc123"
  related_entries: []
  expiry: null
duplicates_found: []
confidence: 1.0
evidence_anchors:
  - "CLAUDE.md:45-52"
  - "verification:re-read:success"
assumptions:
  - "CLAUDE.md is the correct location for architecture decisions"
  - "No conflicting database decisions exist"

What was written to CLAUDE.md:

### Architecture Decisions

#### Database: PostgreSQL [2024-01-16]

**Decision:** Use PostgreSQL for all persistent storage

**Rationale:** Strong ACID guarantees, mature ecosystem, team familiarity

**Context:** Evaluated PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB for new backend service

**Constraints:**
- Must support complex queries
- Team has PostgreSQL experience

Example 2: Detecting Duplicate

Input:

content:
  pattern: "Wrap external API errors with domain-specific error types"
  rationale: "Prevents leaking implementation details"
destination: CLAUDE.md
section: "Patterns"
content_type: pattern

Output:

persisted:
  content_type: pattern
  content_id: null
  destination: "CLAUDE.md"
  section: "Patterns"
  timestamp: "2024-01-16T11:00:00Z"
write_operation:
  strategy: append
  bytes_written: 0
  lines_added: 0
  lines_modified: 0
verification:
  write_confirmed: false
  content_present: true
  structure_valid: true
metadata:
  source: "conversation:conv_def456"
  related_entries: ["pattern_err_001"]
  expiry: null
duplicates_found:
  - existing_id: "pattern_err_001"
    similarity: 0.95
    action_taken: skipped
confidence: 0.9
evidence_anchors:
  - "CLAUDE.md:134"
assumptions:
  - "High similarity indicates same pattern"
  - "Skipping to avoid duplicate"
next_actions:
  - "Consider updating existing pattern if new rationale is better"

Example 3: Merging with Existing Content

Input:

content:
  fact: "API rate limit is 1000 requests per minute"
  source: "API documentation v2.3"
destination: "docs/api-notes.md"
section: "Rate Limits"
content_type: fact
merge_strategy: merge

Output:

persisted:
  content_type: fact
  content_id: "fact_rate_limit_20240116"
  destination: "docs/api-notes.md"
  section: "Rate Limits"
  timestamp: "2024-01-16T12:00:00Z"
write_operation:
  strategy: merge
  bytes_written: 64
  lines_added: 1
  lines_modified: 1
verification:
  write_confirmed: true
  content_present: true
  structure_valid: true
metadata:
  source: "API documentation v2.3"
  related_entries: ["fact_rate_limit_20231201"]
  expiry: "2024-07-16"
duplicates_found:
  - existing_id: "fact_rate_limit_20231201"
    similarity: 0.8
    action_taken: merged
confidence: 1.0
evidence_anchors:
  - "docs/api-notes.md:23"
  - "source:API documentation v2.3"
assumptions:
  - "New rate limit supersedes previous"
  - "6-month expiry for review"

Verification

• Content validated for appropriateness (no secrets/PII)
• Destination file exists or can be created
• Write operation completed without error
• Content present in destination after write
• File structure/formatting preserved

Verification tools: Read (to verify write), Edit (to perform write)

Safety Constraints

• mutation: true
• requires_checkpoint: false
• requires_approval: false
• risk: medium

Capability-specific rules:

• NEVER persist credentials, API keys, or secrets
• NEVER persist PII without explicit user consent
• Validate content does not contain executable code
• Preserve existing file structure and formatting
• Create backup before replacing existing content
• Stop if destination is a system or configuration file

Composition Patterns

Commonly follows:

• decide - Persist decisions for future reference
• discover - Save discovered patterns or relationships
• recall - Update existing memories with new context
• summarize - Save summary as durable knowledge

Commonly precedes:

• recall - Persisted content becomes available for recall
• verify - Verify persisted content is correct
• audit - Record what was persisted for compliance

Anti-patterns:

• Never persist without checking for duplicates
• Never persist contradictory information without flagging
• Never persist to files outside project scope without approval
• Avoid persisting ephemeral/temporary information

Workflow references:

• Pairs with recall for the remember/recall cycle
• Final step in many learning workflows