Plan Implementation

Implementation Planning

Overview

This skill takes a feature specification document and breaks it down into concrete, manageable implementation phases. Each phase is sized appropriately for implementation (typically completable in a focused work session) and follows a Test-Driven Development approach with vertical slices.

When to Use

• After completing feature discovery (feature spec exists in /docs/features/)
• Before starting implementation of a complex feature
• When a feature needs to be broken into phases for incremental delivery
• When you want to create an actionable task list from a specification
• When planning sprints or work iterations

Core Principles

1. TDD Vertical Slices

Each phase should:

• Start with tests (Red-Green-Refactor)
• Deliver end-to-end functionality (data → logic → UI)
• Be independently testable (can validate it works)
• Build incrementally (each phase adds value to previous)

2. Appropriate Sizing

Tasks should be:

• Small enough: Completable in 30-90 minutes of focused work
• Large enough: Deliver meaningful, testable functionality
• Concrete: Clear acceptance criteria and deliverables
• Independent: Minimal dependencies on other in-progress work

3. Risk-Aware Sequencing

Phases should be ordered to:

• Validate assumptions early: High-risk items in early phases
• Build foundation first: Core domain models before complex logic
• Enable testing: Test infrastructure before feature code
• Deliver value incrementally: Each phase produces working software

Instructions

Phase 1: Analyze Feature Specification

1. Read the feature spec from /docs/features/[feature-name].md
2. Extract requirements: Identify all functional requirements and acceptance criteria
3. Identify complexity areas: Note which parts are complex, risky, or have unknowns
4. Map dependencies: Understand what exists, what's new, what needs changing
5. Review codebase: Read relevant existing code to understand integration points

Phase 2: Design Phase Breakdown

1. Identify vertical slices: What end-to-end capabilities can be delivered incrementally?
2. Sequence for value: What order delivers testable functionality earliest?
3. Group related work: Cluster tasks that naturally belong together
4. Size appropriately: Break large slices into multiple phases if needed
5. Define deliverables: What does "done" look like for each phase?

Phase 3: Create Implementation Tasks

For each phase, define:

1. Phase Goal: One sentence describing what this phase accomplishes
2. Test-First Tasks: What tests to write first (RED phase)
3. Implementation Tasks: What code to write to make tests pass (GREEN phase)
4. Refactoring Tasks: What cleanup/improvements to make (REFACTOR phase)
5. Acceptance Criteria: How to verify this phase is complete

Phase 4: Generate Task List

1. Create TodoWrite list: Populate with first phase tasks
2. Document remaining phases: Write markdown doc with all phases
3. Add phase markers: Clear separators between phases
4. Include estimates: Flag complex/risky tasks
5. Link to spec: Reference feature spec for context

Phase Template

Each phase should follow this structure:

### Phase N: [Descriptive Name]
**Goal**: [One sentence describing what this phase delivers]

**Vertical Slice**: [What end-to-end capability does this deliver?]

**TDD Cycle**:

#### RED - Write Failing Tests
- [ ] Test: [Specific test case 1]
- [ ] Test: [Specific test case 2]
- [ ] Test: [Specific test case 3]

**Why these tests**: [Brief explanation of what behavior we're defining]

#### GREEN - Make Tests Pass
- [ ] Create/modify: [File or class name]
- [ ] Implement: [Specific method or functionality]
- [ ] Wire up: [Integration points]

**Implementation notes**: [Key decisions, patterns to follow, gotchas]

#### REFACTOR - Clean Up
- [ ] Extract: [What to pull out into separate methods/classes]
- [ ] Rename: [What to make clearer]
- [ ] Remove: [What duplication to eliminate]

**Acceptance Criteria**:
- [ ] All tests in this phase pass
- [ ] Code coverage for new code > 80%
- [ ] [Specific observable behavior works]
- [ ] No regressions in existing tests

**Deliverable**: [What working functionality can be demonstrated]

**Estimated Complexity**: [Simple / Medium / Complex]
**Risks**: [Any concerns or unknowns]

Task Sizing Guidelines

Too Small (Avoid)

• Single line changes
• Trivial refactorings
• Adding one test case ❌ Why: Overhead of tracking exceeds value

Just Right (Target)

• Implement one domain concept with tests
• Add one feature capability end-to-end
• Refactor one subsystem with test coverage ✅ Why: Meaningful progress, clear validation, manageable scope

Too Large (Break Down)

• "Implement entire feature"
• "Refactor whole service layer"
• "Add all API endpoints" ❌ Why: Too vague, hard to test, risky, unclear when done

Vertical Slice Examples

Good Vertical Slice

Phase: Add horse training for Speed stat

• Tests: Training increases Speed, respects caps, validates input
• Implementation: Training entity, TrainingService.AddTraining(), Horse.CalculateEffectiveStats()
• Refactor: Extract validation, use value objects
• Demo: Can train a horse's Speed and see it improve in the database

Poor Vertical Slice (Too Horizontal)

Phase: Create all training entities

• Tests: Training entity exists, Stamina entity exists, Agility entity exists
• Implementation: Training class, Stamina class, Agility class
• Refactor: Share base class
• ❌ Problem: Doesn't deliver working feature, can't validate in real scenario

Output Format

This skill produces two outputs:

1. Implementation Plan Document

Create /docs/implementation/[feature-name]-implementation-plan.md with:

• Overview of approach
• All phases with tasks
• Testing strategy
• Risk mitigation notes
• Dependencies and prerequisites

2. TodoWrite Task List

Populate TodoWrite with tasks from Phase 1 only:

• Keeps immediate focus clear
• Avoids overwhelming task list
• Each phase gets added as it becomes active

Integration with Feature Discovery

This skill works hand-in-hand with feature-discovery:

1. feature-discovery: Understand requirements → Create feature spec
2. plan-implementation: Analyze spec → Create implementation plan → Populate tasks
3. Implementation: Execute tasks → Mark todos complete → Move to next phase

Best Practices

Before Planning

• Feature spec exists and is approved
• Open questions are resolved
• Technical approach is validated
• Codebase has been explored

During Planning

• Each phase delivers testable value
• Tests are written before implementation
• Phases build on each other logically
• Risks are identified and sequenced appropriately
• Task list is concrete and actionable

After Planning

• First phase tasks are in TodoWrite
• Implementation plan is documented
• Team/stakeholders agree on approach
• Ready to start implementing immediately

Example Usage

User Workflow

User: "I'm ready to implement the race modifiers refactor"

Claude (using plan-implementation skill):
1. Reads docs/features/race-modifiers-refactor.md
2. Analyzes requirements and existing code
3. Designs 7 phases with vertical slices
4. Creates detailed task breakdown for each phase
5. Writes docs/implementation/race-modifiers-refactor-implementation-plan.md
6. Populates TodoWrite with Phase 1 tasks
7. Reports: "Ready to implement! Phase 1 tasks added to your todo list."

Phase Progression

Phase 1 Complete → Mark todos done → Add Phase 2 todos
Phase 2 Complete → Mark todos done → Add Phase 3 todos
...
All Phases Complete → Feature implemented with full test coverage

Common Phase Patterns

Pattern 1: Foundation Phase

Goal: Set up infrastructure and test harness

• Create test project structure
• Add domain entities/value objects
• Write characterization tests for existing behavior
• Deliverable: Tests run, infrastructure ready

Pattern 2: Core Logic Phase

Goal: Implement main business logic

• Write tests for core calculations/rules
• Implement service methods
• Validate edge cases
• Deliverable: Core feature works in unit tests

Pattern 3: Integration Phase

Goal: Connect to existing systems

• Write integration tests
• Wire up to database/repositories
• Connect to existing services
• Deliverable: Feature works end-to-end

Pattern 4: UI Phase (if applicable)

Goal: Add user-facing interface

• Write UI tests (if framework supports)
• Create controllers/view models
• Wire up to backend services
• Deliverable: Feature accessible to users

Pattern 5: Cleanup Phase

Goal: Remove old code and polish

• Delete deprecated methods
• Consolidate duplicated logic
• Add documentation
• Deliverable: Clean, maintainable codebase

Notes

• This skill uses Read, Grep, Glob to analyze feature specs and codebase
• Uses TodoWrite to create initial task list
• May use AskUserQuestion to clarify ambiguous implementation choices
• Focuses on actionable, concrete tasks rather than abstract planning
• Emphasizes tests-first approach for confidence and correctness
• Delivers working software incrementally rather than big-bang integration

CRITICAL GIT WORKFLOW RULES

NEVER commit or push code without EXPLICIT user approval.

When implementing planned features:

1. Plan Phase: Create implementation plan - NO git commands
2. Implementation: Write code, run tests - NO git commits
3. WAIT for user approval: User must explicitly say "commit this" or "push this"
4. ONLY THEN: Create commits and push to remote

Examples of what NOT to do:

• ❌ "Let me commit Phase 1" (without asking first)
• ❌ Automatically committing after completing a phase
• ❌ Assuming user wants code committed

Correct workflow:

• ✅ Complete phase implementation
• ✅ Run tests to verify
• ✅ Report results to user: "Phase 1 is complete. All tests passing."
• ✅ ASK: "Would you like me to commit these changes?"
• ✅ WAIT for explicit approval
• ✅ ONLY THEN run git commands

COMMIT AND PR MESSAGE RULES

NEVER include Claude Code attribution or self-reference in commits or PRs.

When creating commits or pull requests:

• ❌ NEVER add "🤖 Generated with [Claude Code]" footer
• ❌ NEVER add "Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet" tag
• ❌ NEVER mention Claude, AI, or automated generation
• ✅ Write commit messages as if written by the developer
• ✅ Focus on what changed and why
• ✅ Use professional, technical language only

Examples:

BAD - DO NOT DO THIS:

Feature implementation complete

This adds the new commentary system.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

GOOD - DO THIS:

Feature implementation complete

This adds the new commentary system with event detection
and natural language variation.