How do I install the Pop Assessment Architecture skill?

Run npx skillmds add majiayu000/pop-assessment-architecture in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Pop Assessment Architecture safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Pop Assessment Architecture?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Pop Assessment Architecture free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Pop Assessment Architecture?

majiayu000 (@majiayu000) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Pop Assessment Architecture by majiayu000

Name: Pop Assessment Architecture
Rating: 4.5 (4 reviews)
Author: majiayu000

File contents

Architecture Assessment Skill

Purpose

Provides concrete, reproducible architecture assessment for PopKit plugins using:

Code duplication detection
Coupling/cohesion metrics
Error handling coverage
Tool usage validation

How to Use

Step 1: Run Automated Analysis

python skills/pop-assessment-architecture/scripts/detect_duplication.py packages/plugin/
python skills/pop-assessment-architecture/scripts/analyze_coupling.py packages/plugin/
python skills/pop-assessment-architecture/scripts/calculate_quality.py packages/plugin/

Step 2: Apply Architecture Checklists

Read and apply checklists in order:

checklists/dry-principles.json - Duplication detection
checklists/separation-of-concerns.json - Module boundaries
checklists/error-handling.json - Error coverage
checklists/tool-selection.json - Appropriate tool usage

Step 3: Generate Report

Combine automated analysis with checklist results for final architecture report.

Standards Reference

Standard	File	Key Checks
DRY Principles	`standards/dry-principles.md`	DRY-001 through DRY-008
Separation of Concerns	`standards/separation-of-concerns.md`	SOC-001 through SOC-008
Error Handling	`standards/error-handling.md`	EH-001 through EH-010
Tool Selection	`standards/tool-selection.md`	TS-001 through TS-008

Quality Metrics

Metric	Good	Warning	Critical
Code Duplication	<5%	5-15%	>15%
Cyclomatic Complexity	<10	10-20	>20
Module Coupling	Low	Medium	High
Module Cohesion	High	Medium	Low
Error Coverage	>80%	50-80%	<50%

SOLID Principles Checks

Principle	Check ID	Description
Single Responsibility	SOLID-001	One reason to change
Open/Closed	SOLID-002	Open for extension
Liskov Substitution	SOLID-003	Proper inheritance
Interface Segregation	SOLID-004	Minimal interfaces
Dependency Inversion	SOLID-005	Depend on abstractions

Output

Returns JSON with:

quality_score: 0-100 (higher = better)
duplication_percent: Code duplication level
coupling_level: Low/Medium/High
technical_debt: List of debt items
refactoring_suggestions: Prioritized improvements

---name: pop-assessment-architecturedescription: Validates PopKit code quality using concrete metrics for DRY, coupling, cohesion, and architectural patterns--- # Architecture Assessment Skill ## Purpose Provides concrete, reproducible architecture assessment for PopKit plugins using: - Code duplication detection - Coupling/cohesion metrics - Error handling coverage - Tool usage validation ## How to Use ### Step 1: Run Automated Analysis ```bash python skills/pop-assessment-architecture/scripts/detect_duplication.py packages/plugin/ python skills/pop-assessment-architecture/scripts/analyze_coupling.py packages/plugin/ python skills/pop-assessment-architecture/scripts/calculate_quality.py packages/plugin/ ``` ### Step 2: Apply Architecture Checklists Read and apply checklists in order: 1. `checklists/dry-principles.json` - Duplication detection 2. `checklists/separation-of-concerns.json` - Module boundaries 3. `checklists/error-handling.json` - Error coverage 4. `checklists/tool-selection.json` - Appropriate tool usage ### Step 3: Generate Report Combine automated analysis with checklist results for final architecture report. ## Standards Reference | Standard | File | Key Checks | | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | | DRY Principles | `standards/dry-principles.md` | DRY-001 through DRY-008 | | Separation of Concerns | `standards/separation-of-concerns.md` | SOC-001 through SOC-008 | | Error Handling | `standards/error-handling.md` | EH-001 through EH-010 | | Tool Selection | `standards/tool-selection.md` | TS-001 through TS-008 | ## Quality Metrics | Metric | Good | Warning | Critical | | --------------------- | ---- | ------- | -------- | | Code Duplication | <5% | 5-15% | >15% | | Cyclomatic Complexity | <10 | 10-20 | >20 | | Module Coupling | Low | Medium | High | | Module Cohesion | High | Medium | Low | | Error Coverage | >80% | 50-80% | <50% | ## SOLID Principles Checks | Principle | Check ID | Description | | --------------------- | --------- | ---------------------- | | Single Responsibility | SOLID-001 | One reason to change | | Open/Closed | SOLID-002 | Open for extension | | Liskov Substitution | SOLID-003 | Proper inheritance | | Interface Segregation | SOLID-004 | Minimal interfaces | | Dependency Inversion | SOLID-005 | Depend on abstractions | ## Output Returns JSON with: - `quality_score`: 0-100 (higher = better) - `duplication_percent`: Code duplication level - `coupling_level`: Low/Medium/High - `technical_debt`: List of debt items - `refactoring_suggestions`: Prioritized improvements

Frequently asked questions