Prc

PR Review Comments Handler

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

Fetch, analyze, and address code review comments on the current PR. Present an action plan for user approval before implementing fixes, then commit and reply to reviewers.

Related Skills

• /sr — Initiate a code review (before merge). Use that skill to start a review, this skill to address the results.
• /si — Task-based implementation with "Address CR" mode. Use /si when review feedback requires structured task-driven changes; use /prc for direct, ad-hoc PR comment handling.

GATE 1: Identify PR & Fetch Comments

Step 1: Resolve PR

If $ARGUMENTS contains a PR number, use it. Otherwise:

1. Run git branch --show-current to get the current branch
2. Run gh pr view --json number,title,url to find the open PR

Error — no PR found: Inform user: "No open PR found for branch {branch}. Verify the branch is pushed and the PR is open." Stop execution.

Step 2: Fetch Comments

1. Run gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews to get reviews
2. Run gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments to get inline comments
3. Also check gh pr view {pr_number} --json comments for general PR comments

Error — no comments found: Inform user: "No review comments found on PR #{number}. Nothing to address." Stop execution.

GATE 2: Analyze & Present Plan

Step 1: Categorize Comments

For each review comment, evaluate:

• Is the feedback valid and technically correct?
• Is it applicable to the current code?
• Does it align with project conventions and architecture?
• Is it a blocker or a nice-to-have suggestion?

Classify each comment into one of:

• Address — Valid feedback, will fix
• Skip — Not applicable or already handled (provide reason)
• Discuss — Ambiguous or disagreed, needs user input

Step 2: Present Action Plan

Display a table:

| # | File:Line | Comment Summary | Action | Complexity |
|---|-----------|-----------------|--------|------------|
| 1 | src/foo.ts:42 | Missing null check | Address | Simple |
| 2 | src/bar.ts:15 | Rename variable | Address | Simple |
| 3 | src/baz.ts:88 | Architecture concern | Discuss | Significant |

STOP — Use AskUserQuestion to confirm the plan. Ask user to approve, modify, or flag any items they disagree with. Do not proceed until user approves.

GATE 3: Implement & Verify

Step 1: Apply Fixes

For each approved "Address" item:

1. Read the target file
2. Make the necessary code change using Edit
3. Track progress with TodoWrite

For "Discuss" items the user resolved: apply the agreed-upon fix.

Step 2: Run Verification

1. Run project tests (npm test or equivalent)
2. Run lint checks (npm run lint or equivalent)
3. Run type checks if applicable (tsc --noEmit)

Error — tests or lint fail: Present failures to user. Do not proceed to GATE 4. Work with user to resolve, or revert changes if needed.

GATE 4: Commit, Push & Reply

Step 1: Commit & Push

1. Stage changed files with git add (specific files only)
2. Ask user permission before committing
3. Create a focused commit: fix: address PR review feedback
4. Push to update the PR

Step 2: Reply to Comments

For each addressed comment:

• Reply with a brief description of what was done (1-2 sentences)
• Use gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/comments/{comment_id}/replies -f body="..." to reply

For skipped comments:

• Reply explaining why respectfully

Error — gh API reply fails: Report the error and suggest manual reply via GitHub UI.

Output Format

Provide a final summary:

## PR Review Summary

**PR**: #XX - Title
**Reviewer(s)**: @username

### Comments Addressed:
1. [file:line] - Brief description of fix
2. [file:line] - Brief description of fix

### Comments Skipped (if any):
1. [file:line] - Reason why not applicable

### Changes Made:
- List of files modified
- New commit: {hash}