Research Council

Research Council Skill

Purpose

Orchestrate parallel research across multiple sources without the full Architecture Council process. Used when you need comprehensive research from different angles but don't need architectural debate and synthesis.

When to Use

Council Composition

Protocol

Phase 1: Query Definition

Define parallel research queries:

1. Internal: "How does our codebase handle X?"
2. Docs: "What does Effect documentation say about X?"
3. Standards: "What industry standards apply to X?"
4. Community: "What are common patterns for X?"

Phase 2: Parallel Research

Spawn oracle agents in parallel:

• Each oracle queries its domain
• Writes findings to shared report
• Signals completion

Phase 3: Synthesis

Combine findings into research report:

• Cross-reference sources
• Identify consensus
• Flag contradictions
• Summarize actionable insights

Report Format

# Research Report: <Topic>

**Generated**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Author**: Research Council

---

## Executive Summary

[Key findings in 3-5 bullet points]

---

## Internal Analysis

**Query**: "How does our codebase handle X?"

### Findings

[Codebase patterns found]

### Codebase References

| File | Relevance |
|------|-----------|
| `src/lib/...` | Description |

---

## Documentation Research

**Query**: "What does Effect documentation say about X?"
**Source**: deepwiki: Effect-TS/effect

### Findings

[Documentation patterns]

### Verification Status

- [x] API verified current
- [ ] Breaking changes checked

---

## Industry Standards

**Query**: "What industry standards apply to X?"
**Source**: exa search, ISA/FDA/ISO references

### Findings

[Standards references]

### Applicable Standards

| Standard | Relevance | Link |
|----------|-----------|------|
| ISA-95 | ... | ... |

---

## Community Patterns

**Query**: "What are common patterns for X?"
**Source**: exa search, GitHub, blog posts

### Findings

[Community patterns]

### References

1. [Reference 1]
2. [Reference 2]

---

## Cross-Reference Analysis

### Consensus

[What all sources agree on]

### Contradictions

[Where sources disagree]

### Gaps

[What no source addressed]

---

## Recommendations

1. [Actionable recommendation]
2. [Actionable recommendation]

---

## Sources

[Full citation list]

Example Invocation

User Request

"Research how event sourcing is used in IIoT manufacturing systems"

Claude Response

I'll convene a Research Council to investigate this from multiple angles.

**Research Queries**:
1. Internal: "Event patterns in our IIoT codebase"
2. Docs: "Effect EventLog patterns"
3. Standards: "ISA-95 event sourcing manufacturing"
4. Community: "IIoT event sourcing best practices"

[Oracles run in parallel]

**Report generated**: thoughts/shared/reports/2026-01-26-es-iiot-research.md

MCP Tool Usage

deepwiki (Documentation)

mcp__deepwiki__ask_question
  repoName: "Effect-TS/effect"
  question: "What is the recommended pattern for EventLog in production use?"

exa (Web Search)

mcp__exa__search
  query: "ISA-95 event sourcing manufacturing operations management 2024"

mcp__exa__search
  query: "event sourcing IIoT best practices industrial"

playwright (Standards Scraping)

For regulatory documents that need scraping:

mcp__playwright__navigate
  url: "https://www.isa.org/standards/..."

Query Templates

Technology Evaluation

Internal: "Do we already use {technology}?"
Docs: "What is {technology} designed for?"
Standards: "{technology} in {domain} standards"
Community: "{technology} production experience reviews"

Pattern Investigation

Internal: "How do we implement {pattern}?"
Docs: "Recommended implementation of {pattern}"
Standards: "Industry standards for {pattern}"
Community: "{pattern} best practices {domain}"

Problem Research

Internal: "Do we have this {problem}?"
Docs: "Known issues with {related-feature}"
Standards: "Industry solutions for {problem}"
Community: "{problem} solutions {technology}"

Lightweight vs Full Council

Research Council (This Skill)

Queries → Oracles → Report

• ~10-15 minutes
• Information gathering
• Report output

Architecture Council (Full)

Documents → Agents → Journal → Synthesis → Spec → ADR → WBS

• ~30-60 minutes
• Decision making
• Multiple artifacts

Output Location

Reports go to:

thoughts/shared/reports/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md

Related Skills

Anti-Patterns

DON'T: Use for decisions

❌ "Should we use X or Y?" → Use Architecture Council
✅ "What is X and Y?" → Use Research Council

DON'T: Skip internal analysis

❌ Only search externally
✅ Always check codebase first

DON'T: Ignore contradictions

❌ "Source A says X"
✅ "Source A says X, but Source B says Y. Resolution needed."