STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Purpose
- Convert research artifacts into submission-ready packages while preserving evidential rigor.
- Enforce venue constraints, ethics/compliance requirements, and explicit ceilings on claims.
- Maintain structure-first documentation for repeatability.
Trigger Conditions
- Positive: preparing papers, artifacts, or supplements for conferences/journals; responding to reviews.
- Negative: initial ideation (use
rapid-idea-generator) or core method design (method-development).
Guardrails
- Constraint buckets: HARD (venue format, policies, deadlines), SOFT (tone, emphasis), INFERRED (reviewer expectations) with sources.
- Two-pass refinement: structure/formatting → epistemic/evidence audit.
- All claims trace to evidence; compliance (ethics, licenses, data) validated.
Inputs
- Target venue guidelines and templates.
- Final results, figures, tables, and references.
- Ethics approvals, licenses, and author info.
Workflow
- Scope & Constraints: Capture venue rules, deadlines, and compliance needs; confirm INFERRED expectations.
- Structure Pass: Organize sections, figures/tables, and formatting per template.
- Evidence Pass: Link claims to evidence, check for overclaims, and apply confidence ceilings.
- Compliance & QA: Verify ethics, licenses, checklists, and reproducibility artifacts.
- Package & Review: Produce submission bundle, response notes, and storage locations; update references/examples.
Validation & Quality Gates
- Formatting and length comply with venue.
- Claims carry evidence and confidence ceilings.
- Compliance artifacts present (ethics, licenses, reproducibility).
- Submission package logged with paths and versioning.
Response Template
**Constraints**
- HARD / SOFT / INFERRED.
**Readiness**
- Sections/figures status, formatting, compliance checks.
**Evidence & Risks**
- Overclaim audit, missing artifacts, reviewer risks.
**Next Steps**
- ...
Confidence: 0.83 (ceiling: research 0.85) - based on compliance and evidence checks.
Confidence: 0.83 (ceiling: research 0.85) - reflects validated packaging and compliance review.
1---2name: research-publication3description: Prepare research outputs for publication with compliance to venue rules, evidence integrity, and confidence ceilings.4---5
6
7
8## STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
9
10### Purpose
11- Convert research artifacts into submission-ready packages while preserving evidential rigor.
12- Enforce venue constraints, ethics/compliance requirements, and explicit ceilings on claims.
13- Maintain structure-first documentation for repeatability.
14
15### Trigger Conditions
16- **Positive:** preparing papers, artifacts, or supplements for conferences/journals; responding to reviews.
17- **Negative:** initial ideation (use `rapid-idea-generator`) or core method design (`method-development`).
18
19### Guardrails
20- Constraint buckets: HARD (venue format, policies, deadlines), SOFT (tone, emphasis), INFERRED (reviewer expectations) with sources.
21- Two-pass refinement: structure/formatting → epistemic/evidence audit.
22- All claims trace to evidence; compliance (ethics, licenses, data) validated.
23
24### Inputs
25- Target venue guidelines and templates.
26- Final results, figures, tables, and references.
27- Ethics approvals, licenses, and author info.
28
29### Workflow
301. **Scope & Constraints**: Capture venue rules, deadlines, and compliance needs; confirm INFERRED expectations.
312. **Structure Pass**: Organize sections, figures/tables, and formatting per template.
323. **Evidence Pass**: Link claims to evidence, check for overclaims, and apply confidence ceilings.
334. **Compliance & QA**: Verify ethics, licenses, checklists, and reproducibility artifacts.
345. **Package & Review**: Produce submission bundle, response notes, and storage locations; update references/examples.
35
36### Validation & Quality Gates
37- Formatting and length comply with venue.
38- Claims carry evidence and confidence ceilings.
39- Compliance artifacts present (ethics, licenses, reproducibility).
40- Submission package logged with paths and versioning.
41
42### Response Template
43```
44**Constraints**
45- HARD / SOFT / INFERRED.
46
47**Readiness**
48- Sections/figures status, formatting, compliance checks.
49
50**Evidence & Risks**
51- Overclaim audit, missing artifacts, reviewer risks.
52
53**Next Steps**
54- ...
55
56Confidence: 0.83 (ceiling: research 0.85) - based on compliance and evidence checks.
57```
58
59Confidence: 0.83 (ceiling: research 0.85) - reflects validated packaging and compliance review.
majiayu000