Self Improve

Self-Improve

Review the current conversation to extract durable lessons and route each one to the right knowledge layer.

Step 1: Detect Context

Available destinations:

• Project AGENTS.md — AGENTS.md in the project root, plus any nested AGENTS.md files in subdirectories. A nested file scopes its guidance to that subtree, so a lesson scoped to one subtree belongs in the nearest enclosing file, with the root reserved for project-wide rules.
• Auto memory — Codex memory, if the active harness exposes a project-specific memory file. If no memory location is available, skip this destination.
• Skills — Project skills at .agents/skills/ (walked from project root down to cwd) and user-installed skills at ~/.agents/skills/ (resolve symlinks)

Discover the project AGENTS.md files (the root file and any nested ones in subdirectories) and read them, then read any available Codex memory. List all skill directories but do not read them yet — Step 2 needs to run first so you know what to look for.

Turbo Skill Detection

Read ~/.turbo/config.json for repoMode. If repoMode is "fork" or "source", turbo skill improvements can be contributed upstream.

If ~/.turbo/repo/ exists, identify which installed skills are turbo skills:

• List directories in ~/.turbo/repo/codex/skills/
• Any skill in ~/.agents/skills/ that has a matching directory in ~/.turbo/repo/codex/skills/ is a turbo skill
• Skills only in ~/.agents/skills/ (no match in the repo) are user/project skills

Verification rule (mandatory before routing in Step 4): For every candidate skill that is about to be routed as turbo, confirm with a fresh test -d ~/.turbo/repo/codex/skills/<name> check that the skill actually lives in the turbo repo. Do not rely on remembered listings from earlier in the session, filename hits in grep output, or assumptions based on where a SKILL.md was read from. A miss here mislabels a user/project skill as turbo, triggers the contribution flow unnecessarily, and can introduce session-specific content into a shared skill — so the check is not optional.

Exception: If the current project IS the turbo repo (i.e., the working directory contains this skill collection), route turbo skill lessons through the Existing user/project skill destination in Step 4 — edits go directly to codex/skills/<name>/ in the project, with no installed-copy indirection and no contribution flow.

Step 2: Identify Session Skills and Scan for Lessons

Identify Session Skills

Before scanning for lessons, identify which skills were loaded during this session:

• Scan the conversation for Turbo skill invocations and SKILL.md reads from ~/.agents/skills/
• Build a list of session skills, marking each as turbo or user/project skill (using the detection from Step 1)
• This list informs routing in Step 4: when a lesson clearly arose from a specific skill's workflow, that skill is the natural routing target

Scan for Lessons

Scan the full conversation with this priority:

1. Corrections — Where the user interrupted, said "no", "actually", "stop", "not like that", redirected, or manually fixed something Codex did wrong. Highest-value lessons.
2. Repeated guidance — Instructions the user gave more than once.
3. Skill-shaped knowledge — Domain expertise that was needed repeatedly, tool/API integration details that had to be looked up, decision frameworks that emerged for evaluating options, content templates or writing conventions that were refined, and multi-step workflows where ordering mattered (as reusable domain knowledge, not the workflow itself — see #4).
4. New workflows — Did this session establish a novel multi-step procedure, coordination pattern, or automation that worked? A successful workflow that would need to be repeated is a prime skill candidate — even if it ran fine this time. Distinct from #3: this captures the procedure itself as a repeatable artifact, not knowledge about how to do it. Flag it.
5. Preferences — Formatting, naming, style, or tool choices the user expressed.
6. Failure modes — Approaches that failed, with what worked instead. For tool or script call failures, trace back to the information source that led to the error and route the fix there (e.g., clarify a reference file, update skill instructions, add missing documentation).
7. Domain knowledge — Facts or conventions Codex needed but did not have.
8. Improvement opportunities — Out-of-scope improvements noticed during work: code that could be refactored, missing tests, performance issues, readability concerns, or feature ideas that were intentionally skipped to stay focused. Skipped findings count here: when code simplification or code review identified a genuine improvement or issue but it was skipped for this session, route it as a project improvement so it isn't lost.
9. Trusted reviewer feedback — Human PR review comments that reveal project conventions, patterns, or corrections. Trusted reviewers are repo collaborators with admin or maintain roles (determine via gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators --jq '.[] | select(.role_name == "admin" or .role_name == "maintain") | .login'). Their feedback takes precedence over other reviewers and AI bots when there are contradictions.

After scanning, read all skill SKILL.md files (they are small). This gives Step 4 full context for routing.

Step 3: Filter

Keep only lessons that are:

• Stable — likely to remain true across future sessions
• Non-obvious — Codex would not already know this
• Actionable — can be expressed as a rule or instruction
• Not already documented — absent from the files read in Step 1. A lesson documented only in an unrelated subtree's AGENTS.md still counts as undocumented for the subtree it actually applies to.
• Still a concern — the issue is not already fixed by changes made in this session. If a bug was found and fixed, or a missing feature was added, future sessions will see the corrected code — they don't need a reminder about the old problem. Exception: successful workflows and procedures are not "resolved" — they're skill candidates precisely because they worked and will need to be repeated.

Discard anything session-specific, speculative, one-off, or already resolved by code changes in this session (but not successful workflows — see exception above). If no lessons survive filtering, tell the user and stop.

Step 4: Route Each Lesson

Assign each surviving lesson to exactly one destination.

Skill-first rule (mandatory): Before consulting the table below, check whether the lesson corrects, refines, or adds a guardrail to any existing skill's behavior — turbo or user/project. This includes lessons about skipping steps, wrong defaults, missing edge cases, or any "don't do X when running $skill-name" correction. If yes, route to that skill. Do not route skill corrections to auto memory or AGENTS.md — they belong in the skill they correct. This rule is not a preference; it is a hard constraint that takes precedence over the table rows below.

Skill categories:

Splitting heuristic: When a session creates scripts or multi-step procedures, split the lesson: a brief pointer goes to AGENTS.md (script names, purpose), and the full workflow goes to a skill. Don't collapse them into a single AGENTS.md entry.

Tiebreakers (in priority order):

1. Skill correction → skill (hard rule). Any lesson that corrects, constrains, or refines a skill's behavior MUST route to that skill. Never to auto memory, never to AGENTS.md. This is the highest-priority routing rule.
2. Turbo skill vs. AGENTS.md → always the turbo skill. Broader impact (benefits all turbo users), better scoped, loaded only when relevant.
3. Skill vs. AGENTS.md → always the skill. Skills are more discoverable, better scoped, and loaded only when relevant.
4. Skill vs. auto memory → always the skill. If a lesson falls within the domain of an existing skill, it goes to the skill. Auto memory is for knowledge that has no skill home.
5. AGENTS.md vs. auto memory — intentional decisions go to AGENTS.md. Discovered knowledge (gotchas, workarounds, quirks) goes to auto memory.
6. Lesson vs. improvement — if the item is knowledge to remember, it's a lesson. If it's work to do later, it's an improvement. They don't compete — the same session can produce both.

Step 5: Present Routing Plan

Output a table as text before making any changes:

| # | Lesson | Destination | Action |
|---|--------|-------------|--------|
| 1 | Always use X for... | Project AGENTS.md | Append to ## Conventions |
| 2 | The $create-pr skill should... | ~/.agents/skills/create-pr | Update Step 2 |
| 3 | Multi-step deploy workflow | New project skill | Create new skill |
| 4 | User prefers short commit msgs | Auto memory | Append to MEMORY.md |

For each lesson, show: concise summary, target file/skill, and whether it's an append, update-in-place, or new creation.

Then use request_user_input with these options: Approve or Reject.

Step 6: Execute

Apply approved changes in order:

1. Improvements — For items routed to project improvements, run $note-improvement with the summary, location, and rationale for each.
2. Updates to auto memory — Read the target, find the right section, append or update in place, following the memory system conventions from the system prompt.
3. Updates to AGENTS.md — Read the target file selected in Step 4 (the root file or a nested subtree file), find the right section, append or update in place. Match the tone and format already present.
4. Updates to user/project skills — Run $create-skill to apply changes to any file inside the skill directory (SKILL.md, references, scripts, assets).
5. New skills — Run $create-skill for each new skill. Provide the trigger conditions and relevant context from the session.
6. Updates to turbo skills — For each lesson routed to a turbo skill:
   1. Read ~/.turbo/repo/codex/SKILL-CONVENTIONS.md so turbo-specific conventions are in context before any editing.
   2. Run $create-skill to update the installed copy at ~/.agents/skills/<name>/.
   3. After the edit is in place and reviewed, if repoMode is "fork" or "source", use request_user_input to ask "These turbo skill improvements could benefit other users. Submit them upstream?" When the user confirms, run $contribute-turbo.

Then update or check the active plan and proceed to any remaining task.

Writing Guidelines

• Match the tone and format of the target file
• Use imperative mood and short declarative sentences
• Group related insights under a descriptive heading
• Omit rationale unless the rule would seem arbitrary without it
• Never include temporary state, in-progress work, or task-specific details
• Keep lessons generic—avoid overly concrete examples; state the rule, not the instance
• For AGENTS.md: write as agent documentation — project rules any AI agent on this repo should follow
• For auto memory: write as personal Codex notes — concise, operational, organized by topic
• For skills: follow the conventions in the existing skill collection