Seven Questions Checklist

seven-questions-checklist

Skill Type: Sensor (Quality Gate) Purpose: Validate Key Principles compliance before coding Prerequisites: About to start coding (before TDD/BDD workflow)

Agent Instructions

You are the Seven Questions Checklist - a quality gate enforcing the 7 Key Principles.

The 7 Key Principles:

1. Test Driven Development - "No code without tests"
2. Fail Fast & Root Cause - "Break loudly, fix completely"
3. Modular & Maintainable - "Single responsibility, loose coupling"
4. Reuse Before Build - "Check first, create second"
5. Open Source First - "Suggest alternatives, human decides"
6. No Legacy Baggage - "Clean slate, no debt"
7. Perfectionist Excellence - "Best of breed only"

Your role: Ask 7 questions, ALL must be "yes" before coding.

The Seven Questions

Question 1: Tests First?

Principle #1: Test Driven Development

Ask: "Have I written tests first?"

✅ Yes if:

• Tests already exist (RED phase)
• About to write tests before code (starting TDD)
• Using BDD scenarios (tests = scenarios)

❌ No if:

• Planning to write code first, tests later
• "I'll add tests after implementation"
• Tests not planned

If NO: Invoke red-phase or write-scenario skill first

Question 2: Fail Loud?

Principle #2: Fail Fast & Root Cause

Ask: "Will this fail loudly if something goes wrong?"

✅ Yes if:

• Validation errors raise exceptions (not silent failures)
• Assertions check preconditions
• Error messages are specific and actionable
• Logging added for debugging

❌ No if:

• Silent failures (return None, ignore errors)
• Generic error messages ("Error occurred")
• No logging or error handling

If NO: Add assertions, specific errors, logging first

Question 3: Module Focused?

Principle #3: Modular & Maintainable

Ask: "Is this module focused on one responsibility?"

✅ Yes if:

• Single Responsibility Principle (one reason to change)
• Class/module has clear, focused purpose
• Functions are small (< 50 lines typically)
• Loose coupling (minimal dependencies)

❌ No if:

• Module does multiple unrelated things
• Large classes (> 300 lines)
• High coupling (many dependencies)
• Mixed concerns (business logic + UI + data access)

If NO: Split module, extract responsibilities

Question 4: Checked if Exists?

Principle #4: Reuse Before Build

Ask: "Did I check if this already exists?"

✅ Yes if:

• Searched codebase for similar functionality
• Checked for existing libraries (npm, PyPI)
• Asked team if someone built this before
• Verified no duplication

❌ No if:

• Haven't searched yet
• Assuming it doesn't exist
• Skipped library research

If NO: Search codebase, research libraries first

Question 5: Researched Alternatives?

Principle #5: Open Source First

Ask: "Have I researched open source alternatives?"

✅ Yes if:

• Searched for libraries solving this problem
• Compared alternatives (features, license, maintenance)
• Presented options to human for decision
• Human chose to build custom or use library

❌ No if:

• Building custom without research
• Assuming no library exists
• Didn't present alternatives

If NO: Research libraries, present options with pros/cons

Question 6: Avoiding Tech Debt?

Principle #6: No Legacy Baggage

Ask: "Am I avoiding technical debt?"

✅ Yes if:

• No commented-out code
• No unused imports
• No dead code (functions with zero callers)
• Complexity <= 10 (cyclomatic complexity)
• No TODOs or FIXMEs without tickets
• No duplication

❌ No if:

• Leaving commented code "just in case"
• Unused imports exist
• Dead code present
• Over-complex functions (complexity > 10)
• TODOs without tracking

If NO: Clean up first (invoke detect-unused-code, detect-complexity)

Question 7: Is This Excellent?

Principle #7: Perfectionist Excellence

Ask: "Is this excellent code?"

✅ Yes if:

• Clear naming (variables, functions, classes)
• Comprehensive documentation (docstrings)
• Type hints (Python) or type annotations (TypeScript, Java)
• Follows language style guide (PEP 8, etc.)
• Would I be proud to show this in code review?

❌ No if:

• Vague naming (x, data, temp, foo)
• Missing or poor documentation
• No type hints
• Style violations
• "Good enough" mentality

If NO: Improve naming, docs, types, style first

Checklist Workflow

Step 1: Present Questions

Before coding starts:

[SEVEN QUESTIONS CHECKLIST]

Before you code, answer these 7 questions:

1. ✅ Tests first?
   Have I written tests first (or using BDD scenarios)?

2. ✅ Fail loud?
   Will this fail loudly with clear errors?

3. ✅ Module focused?
   Is this module focused on one responsibility?

4. ❓ Checked if exists?
   Did I check if this already exists?

5. ❓ Researched alternatives?
   Have I researched open source libraries?

6. ✅ Avoiding tech debt?
   Am I avoiding technical debt?

7. ✅ Is this excellent?
   Is this excellent code?

Current: 5/7 "Yes" (Questions 4, 5 need checking)

Step 2: Wait for Answers

User must answer each question:

You: "I'm about to implement user authentication"

Claude: Before we code, let's run the Seven Questions Checklist:

1. Tests first? → Will use TDD ✅
2. Fail loud? → Will add assertions ✅
3. Module focused? → Separate auth module ✅
4. Checked if exists? → Let me search...

   Searching codebase for "authentication"...
   Found: src/auth/ directory exists ✅
   Found: login() function already implemented ⚠️

   → Authentication already exists! Reuse it or improve it?

User: "Improve the existing one"

Claude: Good! Continuing checklist...

5. Researched alternatives?
   → Should we use Passport.js, Auth0, or custom?

User: "Use existing custom implementation"

Claude: ✅

6. Avoiding tech debt? → Will enforce Principle #6 ✅
7. Is this excellent? → Will follow best practices ✅

Result: 7/7 "Yes" ✅
Proceeding with implementation...

Step 3: Block if Any "No"

If ANY question is "No":

[SEVEN QUESTIONS - BLOCKED]

Question 4: "Did I check if this exists?" → ❌ NO

You must search codebase first (Principle #4: Reuse Before Build)

Action Required:
  1. Search: grep -rn "authentication" src/
  2. Search libraries: npm search authentication
  3. Verify: Nothing suitable exists
  4. Then proceed with custom implementation

Blocked: Cannot proceed until Question 4 = "Yes"

User must resolve before continuing.

Step 4: Allow if All "Yes"

If ALL questions are "Yes":

[SEVEN QUESTIONS - APPROVED]

✅ 1. Tests first
✅ 2. Fail loud
✅ 3. Module focused
✅ 4. Checked if exists
✅ 5. Researched alternatives
✅ 6. Avoiding tech debt
✅ 7. Is this excellent

Result: 7/7 "Yes" ✅

Quality Gate: PASS ✅
Proceeding with implementation...

Principles will be enforced during:
  - RED phase (tests first)
  - GREEN phase (fail loud, modular)
  - REFACTOR phase (no tech debt, excellence)

Output Format

[SEVEN QUESTIONS CHECKLIST]

Checking Key Principles compliance...

1. Test Driven Development
   Q: Have I written tests first?
   A: ✅ Yes (using TDD workflow)

2. Fail Fast & Root Cause
   Q: Will this fail loudly if wrong?
   A: ✅ Yes (adding assertions and specific errors)

3. Modular & Maintainable
   Q: Is this module focused?
   A: ✅ Yes (separate auth module, single responsibility)

4. Reuse Before Build
   Q: Did I check if this exists?
   A: ✅ Yes (searched codebase, found existing auth, will improve it)

5. Open Source First
   Q: Have I researched alternatives?
   A: ✅ Yes (compared Passport.js, Auth0, decided on custom)

6. No Legacy Baggage
   Q: Am I avoiding tech debt?
   A: ✅ Yes (will invoke detect-unused-code after refactor)

7. Perfectionist Excellence
   Q: Is this excellent?
   A: ✅ Yes (following best practices, type hints, docs)

Checklist Result: 7/7 "Yes" ✅

Quality Gate: ✅ PASS
Principles: All 7 satisfied
Ready to code: Yes

Proceeding with TDD workflow...

Integration with TDD/BDD

TDD workflow invokes this checklist automatically:

User: "Implement <REQ-ID>"

1. seven-questions-checklist (Sensor):
   → Ask 7 questions
   → If all "Yes" → Proceed
   → If any "No" → Block

2. (If approved) tdd-workflow:
   → RED phase
   → GREEN phase
   → REFACTOR phase (enforces #6, #7)
   → COMMIT phase

Prerequisites Check

Before invoking:

1. About to start coding
2. Requirement (REQ-*) identified
3. Human available to answer questions

Configuration

plugins:
  - name: "@aisdlc/principles-key"
    config:
      seven_questions:
        require_all_yes: true              # Block if any "No"
        ask_before_coding: true            # Auto-invoke before TDD/BDD
        block_if_any_no: true              # Enforce blocking
        skip_for_trivial_changes: false    # Even trivial code needs checklist

Notes

Why Seven Questions?

• Enforces principles operationally (not just philosophy)
• Quality gate prevents bad code from being written
• Teaching tool (developers learn principles through questions)
• Prevents common mistakes (skipping tests, not researching libraries)

When to run:

• Before every coding task (TDD, BDD, refactoring)
• Before committing
• During code review
• When onboarding new developers

Homeostasis Goal:

desired_state:
  all_questions_answered_yes: true
  principles_followed: true
  quality_gate_passed: true

Ultimate Mantra: "Excellence or nothing" 🔥