Si

Start Implementation Command

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

Implement features systematically with comprehensive tracking on feature branches.

Three modes of operation:

1. Start — Begin implementation from scratch
2. Continue — Resume in-progress implementation
3. Address CR — Apply code review feedback

Before any work, determine which mode applies by reviewing the task document status and git history.

CONSTRAINTS

• Follow existing task document in tasks/ directory
• Git writes require explicit user permission:
  • Do NOT create commits, push branches, open PRs, merge, rebase, or otherwise modify git state unless the user explicitly approves it.

WORKFLOW STEPS

STEP 1: Task Validation

1. Ask user: "Which task to implement? Provide task name or path." If it was not provided

   • List tasks in tasks/ if unclear

2. Validate document:

   • Confirm the task exists (either a single .md file OR a tasks/task-YYYY-MM-DD-slug/ directory).
   • Confirm scope is unambiguous:
     • Clear acceptance criteria
     • Clear "done" definition (what must be true for completion)
   • Confirm task status is appropriate (e.g., "Ready for Implementation" vs "Draft") and ask before proceeding if unclear.
   • Confirm Linear issue exists and is referenced (ID/link).
   • Confirm there is an implementation plan (even if small): impacted components + test plan.

STEP 2: Setup

Note: Skip this step when continuing implementation or addressing Code Review Results

Status Updates

1. Update task status to "In Progress" with timestamp
2. Create feature branch (name must follow repo convention): feature/wyt-[ID]-[slug]
3. Update task document with branch name
4. Permission gate: If any git operation is required (branch creation, commit, push), ask for explicit approval first.

STEP 3: Implementation

Parallelization (optional)

If you believe part of the work can be done safely in parallel, use the parallelization skill:

• .claude/skills/parallelization/SKILL.md

Sequential Mode

Before Each Step:

1. Announce: "Starting Step [N]: [Description]"
2. Review requirements: Acceptance criteria, tests, artifacts

During Implementation (TDD Approach):

1. Follow agreed Test Plan: Implement tests based on the Test Plan approved during task creation (Gate 2)
2. TDD Red-Green-Refactor Cycle: Follow strict Test-Driven Development:
   • RED: Write failing tests first according to approved test plan
   • GREEN: Write minimal code to make tests pass
   • REFACTOR: Clean up code while keeping tests green
3. Implement tests by approved categories:
   • Business Logic Tests: As/if defined in approved test plan
   • State Transition Tests: As/if defined in approved test plan
   • Error Handling Tests: As/if defined in approved test plan
   • Integration Tests: As/if defined in approved test plan
   • User Interaction Tests: As/if defined in approved test plan
4. Testing tools:
   • Prefer silent scripts in AI-agent mode (backend): npm run test:silent, npm run test:unit:silent, npm run test:integration:silent, npm run test:e2e:silent
   • Local runs are fine with npm run test when you need full output
   • npm run test:ci when the Postgres-backed integration suite is required
   • npm run test:db:start|migrate|stop scripts to spin up and tear down the Supabase-compatible test DB
5. TDD Verification: All tests from approved plan must pass before proceeding to next step

After Each Step:

1. Update the task document (REQUIRED - not just chat output):

   • Mark the step checkbox as complete: - [ ] → - [x]
   • Add Changelog entry describing what was done
   • Update Tests field with command run + result
   • If tests are defined in the Test Plan section, mark those checkboxes too
   • Parallel mode note: when using parallel workers, workers should not edit shared task docs; apply/merge worker outputs first, then update the task doc once to avoid conflicts.

   Example of updating a step in the task doc:

   - [x] Sub-step 3.1: Update CreateSessionUseCase logic
     - **Tests**: Test Suite 3 - PASS
     - **Changelog**: Injected WordGroupService, added validateGroupHasSufficientWords() method
   

2. Commit changes (permission gate):

   • If the user has not explicitly approved git writes: ask for permission before any git command.
   • If approved and the step is complete: use conventional commits (optionally include scope) and include an issue reference when applicable:
     • git add [files] && git commit -m "feat|fix|refactor: [step summary]" -m "Refs: WYT-123"

Error Recovery

• Tests fail: Fix the failing code, re-run tests. Do NOT skip or delete failing tests.
• Quality gate fails: Read the Quality Gate Report, address each failure, re-run.
• Task document incomplete: Ask user to clarify missing criteria before proceeding.

STEP 4: Completion

Final Verification

1. Run quality gates via agent:
   • Use Task tool with subagent_type: "automated-quality-gate"
   • Provide task_path (absolute path to tasks/task-YYYY-MM-DD-slug/) and current branch
   • Agent runs format/lint/types/tests/build and writes a Quality Gate Report in the task directory

Finalize Task Document

1. Update status to "Ready for Review" with timestamp
2. Verify all checkboxes are accurate
3. Add implementation summary

STEP 5: Prepare for Code Review

1. Permission gate (required):

   • Creating a PR and pushing branches requires explicit user approval for git writes.
   • If approval is not given, stop and ask for permission before proceeding.

2. Validate task documentation:

   • Use Task tool with subagent_type: "task-pm-validator"
   • Provide the exact task document path (e.g., tasks/task-2025-01-15-feature-name.md)

3. Create PR + sync Linear (single path):

   • Use Task tool with subagent_type: "create-pr-agent"
   • Provide the exact task document path (e.g., tasks/task-2025-01-15-feature-name.md)
   • This agent handles PR creation and updates the task document with PR links. For Linear updates use the cc-linear skill (.claude/skills/cc-linear/SKILL.md).