Skill Audit
Use this skill to audit existing skills, turn workflow knowledge into useful
agent skills, and review skill libraries at the strategy level. It complements
skill-creator: use this skill to decide what a skill should be, how it should
fit a library, and what needs improvement; use skill-creator when the user
wants the concrete SKILL.md implementation and eval loop.
This workflow is based on Anthropic's June 3, 2026 blog post, "Lessons from
building Claude Code: How we use skills":
https://claude.com/blog/lessons-from-building-claude-code-how-we-use-skills
Core Principle
A good skill is not "some markdown about a topic." It is a compact extension
point that gives the agent non-obvious domain knowledge, reusable files,
deterministic helpers, setup rules, verification habits, and guardrails at the
moment they matter.
Workflow
1. Decide Whether This Should Be A Skill
Create or improve a skill only when at least one of these is true:
- The workflow repeats often enough that users should not re-explain it.
- The agent regularly makes the same domain-specific mistake.
- The work needs local scripts, templates, examples, assets, hooks, or setup.
- The output must follow a stable structure or verification path.
- The knowledge is team-specific, product-specific, infrastructure-specific, or
otherwise not inferable from general model knowledge.
Do not make a skill when the content only restates obvious coding behavior,
generic best practices, or one-off instructions.
2. Classify The Skill
Read references/skill-taxonomy.md and classify the candidate into exactly one
primary category. If it appears to span several categories, tighten the scope or
split it.
Report:
- Primary category
- Secondary category, if truly needed
- Why this category is the cleanest fit
- What would make the skill too broad
3. Draft A Skill Brief
Use assets/skill-brief-template.md for the output. Fill it with:
- Trigger description written for the model, not as a human-facing summary
- High-signal knowledge the model would not otherwise know
- Gotchas and failure modes
- Progressive disclosure map: SKILL.md vs references vs scripts vs assets
- Setup requirements or config questions
- Verification strategy
- Distribution path
- Measurement plan
4. Design Progressive Disclosure
Keep SKILL.md focused on activation, decisions, and the main workflow. Move
details into support files:
references/ for tables, API conventions, taxonomy, playbooks, and long docs
scripts/ for deterministic actions or repetitive checks
assets/ for templates, report formats, starter files, or examples
agents/ for specialized subagent prompts when the repo supports them
evals/ for realistic prompts and objective assertions
Tell the agent exactly when to read each support file.
5. Add Operational Design
Read references/writing-and-operations.md when deciding:
- Whether a setup step or config file is needed
- Whether the skill should remember past runs
- Whether scripts or hooks would improve reliability
- Whether the skill belongs in a repo, a shared plugin, or a marketplace
- What usage signals indicate undertriggering, overtriggering, or decay
6. Hand Off To Implementation
When the user wants the skill built, pass the brief into skill-creator and ask
it to implement the files, generate realistic test prompts, and run validation.
If editing an existing skill, include the exact file paths and the smallest
content changes needed. Do not rewrite unrelated skill behavior.
Output Format
For advisory requests, answer with:
- Decision: create, improve, split, merge, or do not create
- Category: one primary taxonomy category
- Skill brief: filled from the template
- Implementation notes: files to create/edit and validation commands
- Risks: overbreadth, obviousness, missing setup, missing verification, or weak
trigger description
For repository work, actually create or update the files, then run the repo's
skill validation command.
Gotchas
- Do not make a knowledge dump. Convert article or team knowledge into decisions,
checklists, templates, and verification.
- Do not put all details in SKILL.md. Long reference material belongs in support
files.
- Do not write a description as a marketing summary. It must name concrete user
phrases and contexts that should trigger the skill.
- Do not railroad the agent with brittle instructions. Provide defaults,
decision criteria, and escape hatches.
- Do not ship a skill without at least a lightweight way to tell if it worked:
validation commands, example prompts, expected artifacts, or usage metrics.
1---2name: skill-audit-23description: Audit, design, categorize, distribute, and measure agent skills using lessons from Anthropic's Lessons from building Claude Code: How we use skills. Use when reviewing an existing skill, deciding whether a workflow deserves a skill, planning a skill library, turning team knowledge into skills, choosing skill categories, writing trigger descriptions, designing progressive disclosure, or planning skill marketplace and usage measurement.4---5
6# Skill Audit
7
8Use this skill to audit existing skills, turn workflow knowledge into useful
9agent skills, and review skill libraries at the strategy level. It complements
10`skill-creator`: use this skill to decide what a skill should be, how it should
11fit a library, and what needs improvement; use `skill-creator` when the user
12wants the concrete SKILL.md implementation and eval loop.
13
14This workflow is based on Anthropic's June 3, 2026 blog post, "Lessons from
15building Claude Code: How we use skills":
16https://claude.com/blog/lessons-from-building-claude-code-how-we-use-skills
17
18## Core Principle
19
20A good skill is not "some markdown about a topic." It is a compact extension
21point that gives the agent non-obvious domain knowledge, reusable files,
22deterministic helpers, setup rules, verification habits, and guardrails at the
23moment they matter.
24
25## Workflow
26
27### 1. Decide Whether This Should Be A Skill
28
29Create or improve a skill only when at least one of these is true:
30
31- The workflow repeats often enough that users should not re-explain it.
32- The agent regularly makes the same domain-specific mistake.
33- The work needs local scripts, templates, examples, assets, hooks, or setup.
34- The output must follow a stable structure or verification path.
35- The knowledge is team-specific, product-specific, infrastructure-specific, or
36 otherwise not inferable from general model knowledge.
37
38Do not make a skill when the content only restates obvious coding behavior,
39generic best practices, or one-off instructions.
40
41### 2. Classify The Skill
42
43Read `references/skill-taxonomy.md` and classify the candidate into exactly one
44primary category. If it appears to span several categories, tighten the scope or
45split it.
46
47Report:
48- Primary category
49- Secondary category, if truly needed
50- Why this category is the cleanest fit
51- What would make the skill too broad
52
53### 3. Draft A Skill Brief
54
55Use `assets/skill-brief-template.md` for the output. Fill it with:
56
57- Trigger description written for the model, not as a human-facing summary
58- High-signal knowledge the model would not otherwise know
59- Gotchas and failure modes
60- Progressive disclosure map: SKILL.md vs references vs scripts vs assets
61- Setup requirements or config questions
62- Verification strategy
63- Distribution path
64- Measurement plan
65
66### 4. Design Progressive Disclosure
67
68Keep `SKILL.md` focused on activation, decisions, and the main workflow. Move
69details into support files:
70
71- `references/` for tables, API conventions, taxonomy, playbooks, and long docs
72- `scripts/` for deterministic actions or repetitive checks
73- `assets/` for templates, report formats, starter files, or examples
74- `agents/` for specialized subagent prompts when the repo supports them
75- `evals/` for realistic prompts and objective assertions
76
77Tell the agent exactly when to read each support file.
78
79### 5. Add Operational Design
80
81Read `references/writing-and-operations.md` when deciding:
82
83- Whether a setup step or config file is needed
84- Whether the skill should remember past runs
85- Whether scripts or hooks would improve reliability
86- Whether the skill belongs in a repo, a shared plugin, or a marketplace
87- What usage signals indicate undertriggering, overtriggering, or decay
88
89### 6. Hand Off To Implementation
90
91When the user wants the skill built, pass the brief into `skill-creator` and ask
92it to implement the files, generate realistic test prompts, and run validation.
93
94If editing an existing skill, include the exact file paths and the smallest
95content changes needed. Do not rewrite unrelated skill behavior.
96
97## Output Format
98
99For advisory requests, answer with:
100
1011. Decision: create, improve, split, merge, or do not create
1022. Category: one primary taxonomy category
1033. Skill brief: filled from the template
1044. Implementation notes: files to create/edit and validation commands
1055. Risks: overbreadth, obviousness, missing setup, missing verification, or weak
106 trigger description
107
108For repository work, actually create or update the files, then run the repo's
109skill validation command.
110
111## Gotchas
112
113- Do not make a knowledge dump. Convert article or team knowledge into decisions,
114 checklists, templates, and verification.
115- Do not put all details in SKILL.md. Long reference material belongs in support
116 files.
117- Do not write a description as a marketing summary. It must name concrete user
118 phrases and contexts that should trigger the skill.
119- Do not railroad the agent with brittle instructions. Provide defaults,
120 decision criteria, and escape hatches.
121- Do not ship a skill without at least a lightweight way to tell if it worked:
122 validation commands, example prompts, expected artifacts, or usage metrics.