Specification (PRD/Spec Generator)
💡 Recommended Agent:
spec-agent(Specification Specialist)
- CLI: Input
/agentand selectspec-agent- VS Code: Use
@workspace #spec-agentin Chat
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- After brainstorming session is complete
- Transforming clarified requirements into formal specification
- Need structured, testable requirements documentation
- Before creating implementation plan
- 完成 brainstorm 後要產生正式規格文件
- 需要將想法轉換為可測試的需求
Prerequisites
Required: 01-brainstorm.md should exist with:
- Clear problem statement
- Chosen solution approach
- Key decisions documented
Optional: Can generate spec without brainstorm, but will need to ask more clarifying questions
Step-by-Step Workflow
Step 1: Clarifying Questions
If not already covered in brainstorm, ask about:
Problem & Users:
- What specific problem are we solving?
- Who are the target users?
- What are their pain points?
Scope & Boundaries:
- What are the goals (must-have features)?
- What are the non-goals (explicitly excluded)?
- What is the MVP scope vs future enhancements?
Technical Constraints:
- Security requirements (auth, data protection)
- Performance requirements (latency, throughput)
- Schema/API contract requirements
- Integration points with existing systems
Financial Systems Specific:
- Money handling: precision requirements (decimal places)
- Storage format: integer minor units or decimal string?
- Idempotency: which operations must be idempotent?
- Audit trail: what needs to be logged?
- Timezone: how to handle date/time?
Step 2: Generate Structured Spec
Create changes/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/03-spec.md with the following structure:
Template:
# Specification: {Feature Name}
## Overview
{Brief 2-3 sentence description of what this feature does and why it matters}
## Context
{Background information, related systems, and why this is needed now}
## Goals
Primary objectives and business value:
1. {Goal 1: e.g., "Enable users to export transaction history"}
2. {Goal 2: e.g., "Improve reporting speed by 50%"}
3. {Goal 3}
## Non-Goals
Explicitly excluded from this implementation:
- {Non-goal 1: e.g., "Real-time streaming (future enhancement)"}
- {Non-goal 2: e.g., "Support for legacy file formats"}
## User Stories
### Story 1: {Actor} wants to {Action}
**As a** {user role}
**I want** {capability}
**So that** {benefit}
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- [ ] {Testable criterion 1}
- [ ] {Testable criterion 2}
- [ ] {Testable criterion 3}
**Edge Cases**:
- {Edge case 1 and how to handle it}
- {Edge case 2}
---
### Story 2: {Title}
{Repeat structure}
---
## Functional Requirements
### FR-1: {Requirement Title}
**Description**: {Detailed description}
**Priority**: Must-Have / Should-Have / Nice-to-Have
**Dependencies**: {Other FRs or systems this depends on}
### FR-2: {Title}
{Repeat structure}
---
## Technical Considerations
### Security
- **Authentication**: {How users are authenticated}
- **Authorization**: {Who can access what}
- **Data Protection**: {Encryption, PII handling}
- **Input Validation**: {What inputs are validated and how}
### Performance
- **Latency**: {Expected response times}
- **Throughput**: {Requests per second}
- **Scalability**: {How this scales with load}
### API/Schema Contracts
- **Endpoints**: {List of API endpoints or contract references}
- **Data Models**: {Key entities and their relationships}
- **Versioning**: {How breaking changes are handled}
### Financial Systems Requirements (if applicable)
- **Money Precision**: Use `decimal` with {X} decimal places OR store as integer minor units (e.g., cents)
- **Currency**: Explicitly store currency code (ISO 4217)
- **Idempotency**: {Which operations support Idempotency-Key header}
- **Audit Trail**: {What events are logged and where}
- **Timezone**: Store timestamps in UTC, display in user timezone
---
## Data Model (if applicable)
### Entity: {EntityName}
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|-------|------|----------|-------------|
| `id` | UUID | Yes | Unique identifier |
| `amount` | Decimal(19,4) | Yes | Transaction amount |
| `currency` | String(3) | Yes | ISO 4217 currency code |
| `createdAt` | DateTime (UTC) | Yes | Creation timestamp |
{Additional entities}
---
## API Contracts (if applicable)
### POST /api/v1/{resource}
**Request**:
```json
{
"field1": "value",
"field2": 123
}
Response (200 OK):
{
"id": "uuid",
"status": "created"
}
Error Responses:
400 Bad Request: Invalid input409 Conflict: Duplicate idempotency key422 Unprocessable Entity: Business rule violation
Success Metrics
How we measure if this feature is successful:
- {Metric 1: e.g., "Export usage increases by 30%"}
- {Metric 2: e.g., "Support tickets for reporting decrease by 50%"}
- {Metric 3}
Open Questions
Items requiring further clarification before implementation:
- {Question 1}
- {Question 2}
References
- Brainstorm:
01-brainstorm.md - Decision Log:
02-decision-log.md - Related ADRs: {Links if applicable}
---
### Step 3: Validation
Ensure the spec meets quality criteria:
**Completeness Checklist**:
- [ ] All user stories have acceptance criteria
- [ ] Edge cases and error scenarios are covered
- [ ] Security requirements are explicit
- [ ] Performance requirements are defined
- [ ] API/schema contracts are documented (if applicable)
- [ ] Financial requirements specify precision (if applicable)
- [ ] Success metrics are measurable
**Testability Check**:
- Can a junior developer implement this without asking clarifying questions?
- Are acceptance criteria explicit and testable?
- Are error conditions and edge cases documented?
**Financial Systems Check** (if applicable):
- ✅ Money uses `decimal` or integer minor units (NO float/double)
- ✅ Currency is explicitly stored
- ✅ Idempotency requirements documented
- ✅ Audit trail requirements defined
- ✅ Timezone handling specified
## Output Template
The generated `03-spec.md` should be:
- **Readable**: A junior developer can understand it
- **Testable**: Every requirement has acceptance criteria
- **Complete**: Covers happy path, edge cases, and errors
- **Traceable**: Links back to brainstorm and decision log
## Quality Criteria
**Must Have**:
- ✅ User stories with acceptance criteria
- ✅ Functional requirements prioritized
- ✅ Security and performance considerations
- ✅ Error handling and edge cases documented
**Financial Systems Must Have**:
- ✅ Money precision specified (NO floats)
- ✅ Idempotency documented for transactions
- ✅ Audit trail requirements defined
**Nice to Have**:
- API contracts with request/response examples
- Data model diagrams
- Sequence diagrams for complex flows
## Next Step
After spec completion:
**CLI**:
Input: "幫我規劃實作計畫" [System loads implementation-planning skill] → /agent → Select plan-agent → Generate 04-plan.md
**VS Code**:
Input: /create-plan Or use: "create implementation plan"
Or use workflow orchestrator:
Input: "what's next?" [System detects spec complete, recommends plan stage]
## Troubleshooting
### "I don't have brainstorm.md yet"
**Solution**: Either:
1. Run brainstorming first (recommended): "開始 brainstorming"
2. Proceed without it (agent will ask more questions)
### "The spec is too vague"
**Solution**: Add more acceptance criteria to user stories. Each criterion should be testable (pass/fail).
### "How detailed should the spec be?"
**Solution**: Detailed enough that:
- A junior developer can implement without confusion
- Acceptance criteria are testable
- But not so detailed that it prescribes implementation (that's for plan stage)
### "Should I include diagrams?"
**Solution**:
- **Yes**: For complex data flows, state machines, or multi-system integrations
- **No**: For simple CRUD operations or straightforward features
- Use tools like Excalidraw or Mermaid for quick diagrams
## Financial Systems Best Practices
### Money Handling
**DON'T**:
```csharp
double price = 19.99; // ❌ Floating point = rounding errors
DO:
// Option 1: Decimal
decimal price = 19.99M;
// Option 2: Integer minor units
int priceInCents = 1999; // Store cents, display as $19.99
string currency = "USD";
Idempotency
For transactional endpoints, specify:
POST /api/v1/transactions
Header: Idempotency-Key: {unique-uuid}
Behavior:
- First request: Process transaction
- Repeat request (same key): Return original result (no duplicate)
- Different key: Process as new transaction
Audit Trail
Document what events to log:
- Transaction created/updated/deleted
- User: who performed action
- Timestamp: when (UTC)
- IP/correlation-id: traceability
Related Documentation
- Brainstorming Skill - Previous stage
- Implementation Planning Skill - Next stage
- WORKFLOW.md - Overall workflow
- API Design Instructions - Financial API standards
💡 Tip: A good spec is complete when you can hand it to a developer and they don't need to ask clarifying questions.