Suede Revenue Operations
Suede RevOps maps the lifecycle rules, data contracts, scoring, routing, and
handoffs that connect acquisition, sales, and customer success. It produces
implementation-ready operating logic while keeping production CRM mutation
behind live-schema review and approval.
Before Starting
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
- GTM motion — Product-led (PLG), sales-led, or hybrid?
- ACV range — What's the average contract value?
- Sales cycle length — Days from first touch to closed-won?
- Current stack — CRM, marketing automation, scheduling, enrichment tools?
- Current state — How are leads managed today? What's working and what's not?
- Goals — Increase conversion? Reduce speed-to-lead? Fix handoff leaks? Build from scratch?
Work with whatever the user gives you. If they have a clear problem area, start there. Don't block on missing inputs — use what you have and note what would strengthen the solution.
Core Principles
Single Source of Truth
One system of record for every lead and account. If data lives in multiple places, it will conflict. Pick a CRM as the canonical source and sync everything to it.
Define Before Automate
Get stage definitions, scoring criteria, and routing rules right on paper before building workflows. Automating a broken process just creates broken results faster.
Measure Every Handoff
Every handoff between teams is a potential leak. Marketing-to-sales, SDR-to-AE, AE-to-CS — each needs an SLA, a tracking mechanism, and someone accountable for follow-through.
Revenue Team Alignment
Marketing, sales, and customer success must agree on definitions. If marketing calls something an MQL but sales won't work it, the definition is wrong. Alignment meetings aren't optional.
Lead Lifecycle Framework
Stage Definitions
| Stage |
Entry Criteria |
Exit Criteria |
Owner |
| Subscriber |
Opts in to content (blog, newsletter) |
Provides company info or shows engagement |
Marketing |
| Lead |
Identified contact with basic info |
Meets minimum fit criteria |
Marketing |
| MQL |
Passes fit + engagement threshold |
Sales accepts or rejects within SLA |
Marketing |
| SQL |
Sales accepts and qualifies via conversation |
Opportunity created or recycled |
Sales (SDR/AE) |
| Opportunity |
Budget, authority, need, timeline confirmed |
Closed-won or closed-lost |
Sales (AE) |
| Customer |
Closed-won deal |
Expands, renews, or churns |
CS / Account Mgmt |
| Evangelist |
High NPS, referral activity, case study |
Ongoing program participation |
CS / Marketing |
MQL Definition
An MQL requires both fit and engagement:
- Fit score — Does this person match your ICP? (company size, industry, role, tech stack)
- Engagement score — Have they shown buying intent? (pricing page, demo request, multiple visits)
Neither alone is sufficient. A perfect-fit company that never engages isn't an MQL. A student downloading every ebook isn't an MQL.
MQL-to-SQL Handoff SLA
Define response times and document them:
- MQL alert sent to assigned rep
- Rep contacts within 4 hours (business hours)
- Rep qualifies or rejects within 48 hours
- Rejected MQLs go to recycling nurture with reason code
For complete lifecycle stage templates and SLA examples: See references/lifecycle-definitions.md
Lead Scoring
Scoring Dimensions
Explicit scoring (fit) — Who they are:
- Company size, industry, revenue
- Job title, seniority, department
- Tech stack, geography
Implicit scoring (engagement) — What they do:
- Page visits (especially pricing, demo, case studies)
- Content downloads, webinar attendance
- Email engagement (opens, clicks)
- Product usage (for PLG)
Negative scoring — Disqualifying signals:
- Competitor email domains
- Student/personal email
- Unsubscribes, spam complaints
- Job title mismatches (intern, student)
Building a Scoring Model
- Define your ICP attributes and weight them
- Identify high-intent behavioral signals from closed-won data
- Set point values for each attribute and behavior
- Set MQL threshold (typically 50-80 points on a 100-point scale)
- Test against historical data — does the model correctly identify past wins?
- Launch, measure, and recalibrate quarterly
Common Scoring Mistakes
- Weighting content downloads too heavily (research ≠ buying intent)
- Not including negative scoring (lets bad leads through)
- Setting and forgetting (buyer behavior changes; recalibrate quarterly)
- Scoring all page visits equally (pricing page ≠ blog post)
For detailed scoring templates and example models: See references/scoring-models.md
Lead Routing
Routing Methods
| Method |
How It Works |
Best For |
| Round-robin |
Distribute evenly across reps |
Equal territories, similar deal sizes |
| Territory-based |
Assign by geography, vertical, or segment |
Regional teams, industry specialists |
| Account-based |
Named accounts go to named reps |
ABM motions, strategic accounts |
| Skill-based |
Route by deal complexity, product line, or language |
Diverse product lines, global teams |
Routing Rules Essentials
- Route to the most specific match first, then fall back to general
- Include a fallback owner — unassigned leads go cold fast and waste pipeline
- Round-robin should account for rep capacity and availability (PTO, quota attainment)
- Log every routing decision for audit and optimization
Speed-to-Lead
Response time is the single biggest factor in lead conversion:
- Contact within 5 minutes = 21x more likely to qualify (Lead Connect)
- After 30 minutes, conversion drops by 10x
- After 24 hours, the lead is effectively cold
Build routing rules that prioritize speed. Alert reps immediately. Escalate if SLA is missed.
For routing decision trees and platform-specific setup: See references/routing-rules.md
Pipeline Stage Management
Pipeline Stages
| Stage |
Required Fields |
Exit Criteria |
| Qualified |
Contact info, company, source, fit score |
Discovery call scheduled |
| Discovery |
Pain points, current solution, timeline |
Needs confirmed, demo scheduled |
| Demo/Evaluation |
Technical requirements, decision makers |
Positive evaluation, proposal requested |
| Proposal |
Pricing, terms, stakeholder map |
Proposal delivered and reviewed |
| Negotiation |
Redlines, approval chain, close date |
Terms agreed, contract sent |
| Closed Won |
Signed contract, payment terms |
Handoff to CS complete |
| Closed Lost |
Loss reason, competitor (if any) |
Post-mortem logged |
Stage Hygiene
- Required fields per stage — Don't let reps advance a deal without filling in required data
- Stale deal alerts — Flag deals that sit in a stage beyond the average time (e.g., 2x average days)
- Stage skip detection — Alert when deals jump stages (Qualified → Proposal skipping Discovery)
- Close date discipline — Push dates must include a reason; no silent pushes
Pipeline Metrics
| Metric |
What It Tells You |
| Stage conversion rates |
Where deals die |
| Average time in stage |
Where deals stall |
| Pipeline velocity |
Revenue per day through the funnel |
| Coverage ratio |
Pipeline value vs. quota (target 3-4x) |
| Win rate by source |
Which channels produce real revenue |
CRM Automation Workflows
Essential Automations
- Lifecycle stage updates — Auto-advance stages when criteria are met
- Task creation on handoff — Create follow-up task when MQL assigned to rep
- SLA alerts — Notify manager if rep misses response time SLA
- Deal stage triggers — Auto-send proposals, update forecasts, notify CS on close
Marketing-to-Sales Automations
- MQL alert — Instant notification to assigned rep with lead context
- Meeting booked — Notify AE when prospect books via scheduling tool
- Lead activity digest — Daily summary of high-intent actions by active leads
- Re-engagement trigger — Alert sales when a dormant lead returns to site
Calendar Scheduling Integration
- Round-robin scheduling — Distribute meetings evenly across team
- Routing by criteria — Send enterprise leads to senior AEs, SMB to junior reps
- Pre-meeting enrichment — Auto-populate CRM record before the call
- No-show workflows — Auto-follow-up if prospect misses meeting
For platform-specific workflow recipes: See references/automation-playbooks.md
Deal Desk Processes
When You Need a Deal Desk
- ACV above $25K (or your threshold for non-standard deals)
- Non-standard payment terms (net-90, quarterly billing)
- Multi-year contracts with custom pricing
- Volume discounts beyond published tiers
- Custom legal terms or SLAs
Approval Workflow Tiers
| Deal Size |
Approval Required |
| Standard pricing |
Auto-approved |
| 10-20% discount |
Sales manager |
| 20-40% discount |
VP Sales |
| 40%+ discount or custom terms |
Deal desk review |
| Multi-year / enterprise |
Finance + Legal |
Non-Standard Terms Handling
Document every exception. Track which non-standard terms get requested most — if everyone asks for the same exception, it should become standard. Review quarterly.
Data Hygiene & Enrichment
Dedup Strategy
- Matching rules — Email domain + company name + phone as primary match keys
- Merge priority — CRM record wins over marketing automation; most recent activity wins for fields
- Scheduled dedup — Run weekly automated dedup with manual review for edge cases
Required Fields Enforcement
- Enforce required fields at each lifecycle stage
- Block stage advancement if fields are empty
- Use progressive profiling — don't require everything upfront
Enrichment Tools
| Tool |
Strength |
| Clearbit |
Real-time enrichment, good for tech companies |
| Apollo |
Contact data + sequences, strong for prospecting |
| ZoomInfo |
Enterprise-grade, largest B2B database |
Quarterly Audit Checklist
- Review and merge duplicates
- Validate email deliverability on stale contacts
- Archive contacts with no activity in 12+ months
- Audit lifecycle stage distribution (look for bottlenecks)
- Verify enrichment data accuracy on a sample set
RevOps Metrics Dashboard
Key Metrics
| Metric |
Formula / Definition |
Benchmark |
| Lead-to-MQL rate |
MQLs / Total leads |
5-15% |
| MQL-to-SQL rate |
SQLs / MQLs |
30-50% |
| SQL-to-Opportunity |
Opportunities / SQLs |
50-70% |
| Pipeline velocity |
(# deals x avg deal size x win rate) / avg sales cycle |
Varies by ACV |
| CAC |
Total sales + marketing spend / new customers |
LTV:CAC > 3:1 |
| LTV:CAC ratio |
Customer lifetime value / CAC |
3:1 to 5:1 healthy |
| Speed-to-lead |
Time from form fill to first rep contact |
< 5 minutes ideal |
| Win rate |
Closed-won / total opportunities |
20-30% (varies) |
Dashboard Structure
Build three views:
- Marketing view — Lead volume, MQL rate, source attribution, cost per MQL
- Sales view — Pipeline value, stage conversion, velocity, forecast accuracy
- Executive view — CAC, LTV:CAC, revenue vs. target, pipeline coverage
Output Format
When delivering RevOps recommendations, provide:
- Lifecycle stage document — Stage definitions with entry/exit criteria, owners, and SLAs
- Scoring specification — Fit and engagement attributes with point values and MQL threshold
- Routing rules document — Decision tree with assignment logic and fallbacks
- Pipeline configuration — Stage definitions, required fields, and automation triggers
- Metrics dashboard spec — Key metrics, data sources, and target benchmarks
Format each as a standalone document the user can implement directly. Include platform-specific guidance when the CRM is known.
Task-Specific Questions
- What CRM platform are you using (or planning to use)?
- How many leads per month do you generate?
- What's your current MQL definition?
- Where do leads get stuck in your funnel?
- Do you have SLAs between marketing and sales today?
Tool Integrations
These are evaluation examples, not guaranteed integrations. Verify the live
schema, authenticated account, permissions, API limits, pricing, and vendor
documentation before proposing implementation.
| Tool Category |
Examples |
Verify Before Use |
| CRM |
HubSpot, Salesforce |
Objects, fields, ownership, automation, permissions |
| Scheduling |
Calendly, SavvyCal |
Routing logic, availability, privacy |
| Enrichment |
Clearbit, Apollo |
Provenance, freshness, lawful basis, credit cost |
| Automation |
ActiveCampaign, Zapier |
Trigger scope, retries, rollback, secrets |
| Partner operations |
Introw, Crossbeam |
Account matching, deal rules, commissions |
Boundaries
- Do not change production CRM fields, routing, automations, permissions, SLAs,
ownership, or records without reading the live schema, previewing the exact
effect, and receiving explicit approval.
- Do not delete, merge, deduplicate, enrich, or reassign records as a planning
step, and do not expose personal data in reports.
- Do not redefine lifecycle stages or claim pipeline impact from modeled data;
document assumptions and the stakeholders who must approve the operating
rule.
Routing
- Use
suede-prospecting to build and qualify the source list.
- Use
suede-cold-email for approved outbound sequence copy.
- Use
suede-sales-enablement for collateral and rep-facing materials.
- Use
suede-analytics for pipeline measurement and attribution.
1---2name: suede-revops3description: Suede-owned revenue-operations discipline. Use when defining lead scoring and routing, MQL or SQL criteria, pipeline stages, CRM hygiene, automation, deal-desk rules, or marketing-to-sales handoffs. NOT FOR: writing outreach (use suede-cold-email), lifecycle campaigns (use suede-emails), pricing strategy (use suede-pricing), or mutating production CRM records without approval.4---5
6# Suede Revenue Operations
7
8Suede RevOps maps the lifecycle rules, data contracts, scoring, routing, and
9handoffs that connect acquisition, sales, and customer success. It produces
10implementation-ready operating logic while keeping production CRM mutation
11behind live-schema review and approval.
12
13## Before Starting
14
15**Check for product marketing context first:**
16If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
17
18Gather this context (ask if not provided):
19
201. **GTM motion** — Product-led (PLG), sales-led, or hybrid?
212. **ACV range** — What's the average contract value?
223. **Sales cycle length** — Days from first touch to closed-won?
234. **Current stack** — CRM, marketing automation, scheduling, enrichment tools?
245. **Current state** — How are leads managed today? What's working and what's not?
256. **Goals** — Increase conversion? Reduce speed-to-lead? Fix handoff leaks? Build from scratch?
26
27Work with whatever the user gives you. If they have a clear problem area, start there. Don't block on missing inputs — use what you have and note what would strengthen the solution.
28
29---
30
31## Core Principles
32
33### Single Source of Truth
34One system of record for every lead and account. If data lives in multiple places, it will conflict. Pick a CRM as the canonical source and sync everything to it.
35
36### Define Before Automate
37Get stage definitions, scoring criteria, and routing rules right on paper before building workflows. Automating a broken process just creates broken results faster.
38
39### Measure Every Handoff
40Every handoff between teams is a potential leak. Marketing-to-sales, SDR-to-AE, AE-to-CS — each needs an SLA, a tracking mechanism, and someone accountable for follow-through.
41
42### Revenue Team Alignment
43Marketing, sales, and customer success must agree on definitions. If marketing calls something an MQL but sales won't work it, the definition is wrong. Alignment meetings aren't optional.
44
45---
46
47## Lead Lifecycle Framework
48
49### Stage Definitions
50
51| Stage | Entry Criteria | Exit Criteria | Owner |
52|-------|---------------|---------------|-------|
53| **Subscriber** | Opts in to content (blog, newsletter) | Provides company info or shows engagement | Marketing |
54| **Lead** | Identified contact with basic info | Meets minimum fit criteria | Marketing |
55| **MQL** | Passes fit + engagement threshold | Sales accepts or rejects within SLA | Marketing |
56| **SQL** | Sales accepts and qualifies via conversation | Opportunity created or recycled | Sales (SDR/AE) |
57| **Opportunity** | Budget, authority, need, timeline confirmed | Closed-won or closed-lost | Sales (AE) |
58| **Customer** | Closed-won deal | Expands, renews, or churns | CS / Account Mgmt |
59| **Evangelist** | High NPS, referral activity, case study | Ongoing program participation | CS / Marketing |
60
61### MQL Definition
62
63An MQL requires both **fit** and **engagement**:
64
65- **Fit score** — Does this person match your ICP? (company size, industry, role, tech stack)
66- **Engagement score** — Have they shown buying intent? (pricing page, demo request, multiple visits)
67
68Neither alone is sufficient. A perfect-fit company that never engages isn't an MQL. A student downloading every ebook isn't an MQL.
69
70### MQL-to-SQL Handoff SLA
71
72Define response times and document them:
73- MQL alert sent to assigned rep
74- Rep contacts within **4 hours** (business hours)
75- Rep qualifies or rejects within **48 hours**
76- Rejected MQLs go to recycling nurture with reason code
77
78**For complete lifecycle stage templates and SLA examples**: See [references/lifecycle-definitions.md](references/lifecycle-definitions.md)
79
80---
81
82## Lead Scoring
83
84### Scoring Dimensions
85
86**Explicit scoring (fit)** — Who they are:
87- Company size, industry, revenue
88- Job title, seniority, department
89- Tech stack, geography
90
91**Implicit scoring (engagement)** — What they do:
92- Page visits (especially pricing, demo, case studies)
93- Content downloads, webinar attendance
94- Email engagement (opens, clicks)
95- Product usage (for PLG)
96
97**Negative scoring** — Disqualifying signals:
98- Competitor email domains
99- Student/personal email
100- Unsubscribes, spam complaints
101- Job title mismatches (intern, student)
102
103### Building a Scoring Model
104
1051. Define your ICP attributes and weight them
1062. Identify high-intent behavioral signals from closed-won data
1073. Set point values for each attribute and behavior
1084. Set MQL threshold (typically 50-80 points on a 100-point scale)
1095. Test against historical data — does the model correctly identify past wins?
1106. Launch, measure, and recalibrate quarterly
111
112### Common Scoring Mistakes
113
114- Weighting content downloads too heavily (research ≠ buying intent)
115- Not including negative scoring (lets bad leads through)
116- Setting and forgetting (buyer behavior changes; recalibrate quarterly)
117- Scoring all page visits equally (pricing page ≠ blog post)
118
119**For detailed scoring templates and example models**: See [references/scoring-models.md](references/scoring-models.md)
120
121---
122
123## Lead Routing
124
125### Routing Methods
126
127| Method | How It Works | Best For |
128|--------|-------------|----------|
129| **Round-robin** | Distribute evenly across reps | Equal territories, similar deal sizes |
130| **Territory-based** | Assign by geography, vertical, or segment | Regional teams, industry specialists |
131| **Account-based** | Named accounts go to named reps | ABM motions, strategic accounts |
132| **Skill-based** | Route by deal complexity, product line, or language | Diverse product lines, global teams |
133
134### Routing Rules Essentials
135
136- Route to the **most specific match** first, then fall back to general
137- Include a **fallback owner** — unassigned leads go cold fast and waste pipeline
138- Round-robin should account for **rep capacity and availability** (PTO, quota attainment)
139- Log every routing decision for audit and optimization
140
141### Speed-to-Lead
142
143Response time is the single biggest factor in lead conversion:
144- Contact within **5 minutes** = 21x more likely to qualify (Lead Connect)
145- After **30 minutes**, conversion drops by 10x
146- After **24 hours**, the lead is effectively cold
147
148Build routing rules that prioritize speed. Alert reps immediately. Escalate if SLA is missed.
149
150**For routing decision trees and platform-specific setup**: See [references/routing-rules.md](references/routing-rules.md)
151
152---
153
154## Pipeline Stage Management
155
156### Pipeline Stages
157
158| Stage | Required Fields | Exit Criteria |
159|-------|----------------|---------------|
160| **Qualified** | Contact info, company, source, fit score | Discovery call scheduled |
161| **Discovery** | Pain points, current solution, timeline | Needs confirmed, demo scheduled |
162| **Demo/Evaluation** | Technical requirements, decision makers | Positive evaluation, proposal requested |
163| **Proposal** | Pricing, terms, stakeholder map | Proposal delivered and reviewed |
164| **Negotiation** | Redlines, approval chain, close date | Terms agreed, contract sent |
165| **Closed Won** | Signed contract, payment terms | Handoff to CS complete |
166| **Closed Lost** | Loss reason, competitor (if any) | Post-mortem logged |
167
168### Stage Hygiene
169
170- **Required fields per stage** — Don't let reps advance a deal without filling in required data
171- **Stale deal alerts** — Flag deals that sit in a stage beyond the average time (e.g., 2x average days)
172- **Stage skip detection** — Alert when deals jump stages (Qualified → Proposal skipping Discovery)
173- **Close date discipline** — Push dates must include a reason; no silent pushes
174
175### Pipeline Metrics
176
177| Metric | What It Tells You |
178|--------|-------------------|
179| Stage conversion rates | Where deals die |
180| Average time in stage | Where deals stall |
181| Pipeline velocity | Revenue per day through the funnel |
182| Coverage ratio | Pipeline value vs. quota (target 3-4x) |
183| Win rate by source | Which channels produce real revenue |
184
185---
186
187## CRM Automation Workflows
188
189### Essential Automations
190
191- **Lifecycle stage updates** — Auto-advance stages when criteria are met
192- **Task creation on handoff** — Create follow-up task when MQL assigned to rep
193- **SLA alerts** — Notify manager if rep misses response time SLA
194- **Deal stage triggers** — Auto-send proposals, update forecasts, notify CS on close
195
196### Marketing-to-Sales Automations
197
198- **MQL alert** — Instant notification to assigned rep with lead context
199- **Meeting booked** — Notify AE when prospect books via scheduling tool
200- **Lead activity digest** — Daily summary of high-intent actions by active leads
201- **Re-engagement trigger** — Alert sales when a dormant lead returns to site
202
203### Calendar Scheduling Integration
204
205- **Round-robin scheduling** — Distribute meetings evenly across team
206- **Routing by criteria** — Send enterprise leads to senior AEs, SMB to junior reps
207- **Pre-meeting enrichment** — Auto-populate CRM record before the call
208- **No-show workflows** — Auto-follow-up if prospect misses meeting
209
210**For platform-specific workflow recipes**: See [references/automation-playbooks.md](references/automation-playbooks.md)
211
212---
213
214## Deal Desk Processes
215
216### When You Need a Deal Desk
217
218- ACV above **$25K** (or your threshold for non-standard deals)
219- Non-standard payment terms (net-90, quarterly billing)
220- Multi-year contracts with custom pricing
221- Volume discounts beyond published tiers
222- Custom legal terms or SLAs
223
224### Approval Workflow Tiers
225
226| Deal Size | Approval Required |
227|-----------|-------------------|
228| Standard pricing | Auto-approved |
229| 10-20% discount | Sales manager |
230| 20-40% discount | VP Sales |
231| 40%+ discount or custom terms | Deal desk review |
232| Multi-year / enterprise | Finance + Legal |
233
234### Non-Standard Terms Handling
235
236Document every exception. Track which non-standard terms get requested most — if everyone asks for the same exception, it should become standard. Review quarterly.
237
238---
239
240## Data Hygiene & Enrichment
241
242### Dedup Strategy
243
244- **Matching rules** — Email domain + company name + phone as primary match keys
245- **Merge priority** — CRM record wins over marketing automation; most recent activity wins for fields
246- **Scheduled dedup** — Run weekly automated dedup with manual review for edge cases
247
248### Required Fields Enforcement
249
250- Enforce required fields at each lifecycle stage
251- Block stage advancement if fields are empty
252- Use progressive profiling — don't require everything upfront
253
254### Enrichment Tools
255
256| Tool | Strength |
257|------|----------|
258| Clearbit | Real-time enrichment, good for tech companies |
259| Apollo | Contact data + sequences, strong for prospecting |
260| ZoomInfo | Enterprise-grade, largest B2B database |
261
262### Quarterly Audit Checklist
263
264- Review and merge duplicates
265- Validate email deliverability on stale contacts
266- Archive contacts with no activity in 12+ months
267- Audit lifecycle stage distribution (look for bottlenecks)
268- Verify enrichment data accuracy on a sample set
269
270---
271
272## RevOps Metrics Dashboard
273
274### Key Metrics
275
276| Metric | Formula / Definition | Benchmark |
277|--------|---------------------|-----------|
278| Lead-to-MQL rate | MQLs / Total leads | 5-15% |
279| MQL-to-SQL rate | SQLs / MQLs | 30-50% |
280| SQL-to-Opportunity | Opportunities / SQLs | 50-70% |
281| Pipeline velocity | (# deals x avg deal size x win rate) / avg sales cycle | Varies by ACV |
282| CAC | Total sales + marketing spend / new customers | LTV:CAC > 3:1 |
283| LTV:CAC ratio | Customer lifetime value / CAC | 3:1 to 5:1 healthy |
284| Speed-to-lead | Time from form fill to first rep contact | < 5 minutes ideal |
285| Win rate | Closed-won / total opportunities | 20-30% (varies) |
286
287### Dashboard Structure
288
289Build three views:
2901. **Marketing view** — Lead volume, MQL rate, source attribution, cost per MQL
2912. **Sales view** — Pipeline value, stage conversion, velocity, forecast accuracy
2923. **Executive view** — CAC, LTV:CAC, revenue vs. target, pipeline coverage
293
294---
295
296## Output Format
297
298When delivering RevOps recommendations, provide:
299
3001. **Lifecycle stage document** — Stage definitions with entry/exit criteria, owners, and SLAs
3012. **Scoring specification** — Fit and engagement attributes with point values and MQL threshold
3023. **Routing rules document** — Decision tree with assignment logic and fallbacks
3034. **Pipeline configuration** — Stage definitions, required fields, and automation triggers
3045. **Metrics dashboard spec** — Key metrics, data sources, and target benchmarks
305
306Format each as a standalone document the user can implement directly. Include platform-specific guidance when the CRM is known.
307
308---
309
310## Task-Specific Questions
311
3121. What CRM platform are you using (or planning to use)?
3132. How many leads per month do you generate?
3143. What's your current MQL definition?
3154. Where do leads get stuck in your funnel?
3165. Do you have SLAs between marketing and sales today?
317
318---
319
320## Tool Integrations
321
322These are evaluation examples, not guaranteed integrations. Verify the live
323schema, authenticated account, permissions, API limits, pricing, and vendor
324documentation before proposing implementation.
325
326| Tool Category | Examples | Verify Before Use |
327|---------------|----------|-------------------|
328| CRM | HubSpot, Salesforce | Objects, fields, ownership, automation, permissions |
329| Scheduling | Calendly, SavvyCal | Routing logic, availability, privacy |
330| Enrichment | Clearbit, Apollo | Provenance, freshness, lawful basis, credit cost |
331| Automation | ActiveCampaign, Zapier | Trigger scope, retries, rollback, secrets |
332| Partner operations | Introw, Crossbeam | Account matching, deal rules, commissions |
333
334---
335
336## Boundaries
337
338- Do not change production CRM fields, routing, automations, permissions, SLAs,
339 ownership, or records without reading the live schema, previewing the exact
340 effect, and receiving explicit approval.
341- Do not delete, merge, deduplicate, enrich, or reassign records as a planning
342 step, and do not expose personal data in reports.
343- Do not redefine lifecycle stages or claim pipeline impact from modeled data;
344 document assumptions and the stakeholders who must approve the operating
345 rule.
346
347## Routing
348
349- Use `suede-prospecting` to build and qualify the source list.
350- Use `suede-cold-email` for approved outbound sequence copy.
351- Use `suede-sales-enablement` for collateral and rep-facing materials.
352- Use `suede-analytics` for pipeline measurement and attribution.