MCP Server Development
Use This Skill When
- Building new MCP servers to integrate external APIs
- Designing tools for LLM agents to use
- Creating workflows that automate external service interactions
- Integrating third-party services for AI access
- Developing domain-specific protocol servers
When NOT to Use
- Simple API wrapper (consider if MCP overhead justified)
- Systems without external service integration
- Runtime debugging of MCP servers (use logs first)
Context: MCP Server Quality Maturity
Undeveloped: Simple API passthrough, overwhelming tool output, confusing tool names.
Target: Well-scoped tools, clear parameter validation, readable responses, consistent naming.
Optimized: Multi-step workflows, error recovery, cost awareness, LLM-optimized information density.
Core Principle
Design for agent workflows, not just APIs. MCP servers succeed when tools match how agents think about problems, surface actionable information, and guide agents toward correct usage patterns.
Instructions
Phase 1: Research and Design
Study MCP protocol:
- Fetch docs: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/llms-full.txt
- Understand tools, resources, prompts, sampling
Define agent-centric tool design:
| Principle | Example |
|---|---|
| Workflows not endpoints | Tool: "schedule_meeting" that checks availability + creates event (not separate tools) |
| Limited context | Return name+id (not full record); provide "concise" vs "detailed" modes |
| Actionable errors | "Try filter='active' to reduce results" (not just "invalid parameter") |
| Natural naming | "schedule_meeting" (not "create_calendar_event_with_availability_check") |
Phase 2: Implementation
Choose framework:
| Framework | Language | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| FastMCP | Python | Quick prototyping, existing Python APIs |
| MCP SDK | Node.js/TypeScript | Production servers, complex workflows |
FastMCP example:
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
mcp = FastMCP("my-service")
@mcp.tool()
def get_weather(city: str, units: str = "fahrenheit") -> str:
"""Get current weather for a city."""
# Implementation
return f"Weather in {city}: 72°F, sunny"
if __name__ == "__main__":
mcp.run()
Phase 3: Tool Design Best Practices
Design tools for agents:
## Tool Design Checklist
**Clear Purpose**:
- [ ] Tool name describes the action (verb-first)
- [ ] Description fits in 1 sentence
- [ ] Single responsibility (focused outcome)
**Useful Parameters**:
- [ ] Required params only (optional params rarely used by agents)
- [ ] Clear parameter descriptions
- [ ] Validation with helpful error messages
- [ ] Default values where sensible
**Actionable Output**:
- [ ] Return essential information (not exhaustive data)
- [ ] Structure response for parsing (JSON, not freetext)
- [ ] Include status indicators (success/failure, warnings)
- [ ] Provide "what's next" in errors
Example tool:
@mcp.tool()
def search_documents(
query: str,
limit: int = 10,
filter_type: str = "all"
) -> dict:
"""Search internal documents.
Args:
query: Search terms
limit: Max results (reduces context)
filter_type: 'all', 'archived', 'recent'
Returns:
Structured results with score and metadata
"""
# Implementation ensures response is concise
return {
"query": query,
"found": 42,
"results": [
{"title": "...", "score": 0.95, "id": "doc-123"},
# ...limited to 10
],
"hint": "Try filter_type='recent' if results are stale"
}
Phase 4: Evaluation-Driven Development
Test with actual agent use:
## Evaluation Scenarios
**Scenario 1: Basic Workflow**
- Agent: "Find documents about Q4 planning"
- Tools needed: search_documents
- Success metric: Agent gets useful results in 1 call
**Scenario 2: Multi-Step Workflow**
- Agent: "Schedule meeting with availability check"
- Tools needed: check_availability, schedule_meeting
- Success metric: Meeting created without errors
**Scenario 3: Error Recovery**
- Agent: "Search with typo query"
- Tool: Returns helpful error + suggestion
- Success metric: Agent corrects query and retries
Iterate based on results:
- Did agent find right tool?
- Did tool parameters match expectations?
- Was output format helpful?
- Did agent need multiple calls or one?
Phase 5: Documentation and Testing
Document thoroughly:
- Tool descriptions (agent-readable)
- Parameter constraints
- Example calls
- Common error scenarios
Test coverage:
- Happy path (normal operation)
- Invalid inputs (malformed params)
- External service failures (API down)
- Rate limiting (responses)
Output
Deliver MCP server with:
- Tool Design Doc (purpose, parameters, output format)
- Implementation (FastMCP or SDK)
- Evaluation Report (agent test scenarios)
- Documentation (setup, usage, troubleshooting)