Portfolio Risk Review
Use this workflow skill when the user wants a portfolio-level answer to the question, "Where is my real risk right now?" rather than a single-position analysis.
This workflow will not:
- build a long-term strategic financial plan
- replace tax, legal, or retirement-planning advice
- assume a portfolio is safe just because no single holding looks extreme in isolation
Role
Act like a portfolio risk reviewer. Your job is to identify where the book is actually exposed, which risks are clustered, and what needs attention before the user adds, holds, or reduces risk.
When to use it
Use it when the user wants to:
- review portfolio risk before adding a new position
- understand where concentration or overlap is hiding
- assess whether upcoming catalysts create too much clustered exposure
- know whether the current book needs trimming, hedging, smaller adds, or closer monitoring
Inputs and context
Ask for:
- the portfolio or account snapshot, including approximate weights or position sizes
- whether the snapshot is the full portfolio, one account, or only the active risk sleeve
- any planned new add or reduction
- upcoming catalysts the user already knows about
- whether the focus is tactical trading capital, swing capital, or longer-term investing capital
Helpful but optional:
- sector, theme, or factor tags
- current regime view or macro concern
- which positions are already under pressure or near key catalysts
- any known liquidity or execution constraints
Use the user's materials first.
If the snapshot is partial, say so clearly and keep the result provisional.
Workflow routing
Use the smallest useful chain:
- Run
portfolio-concentration to identify direct and indirect concentration.
- If catalyst clustering matters, run
catalyst-map.
- If broad market context matters, run
market-regime-analysis.
- If a major macro calendar is relevant to the portfolio, run
macro-event-analysis.
- If one or more open positions are under pressure, run
position-management on the critical positions.
- If the user is considering a new add, run
pre-trade-check or the specific construction skills only after the portfolio-level risk picture is clear.
Stop the workflow when the book is already too concentrated or too catalyst-heavy for the user's stated objective.
Decision logic
Classify the result as:
portfolio risk acceptable: the book appears aligned with the user's objective and no immediate portfolio-level change is necessary
portfolio risk elevated: the book is still manageable, but concentration, overlap, or catalyst clustering needs active monitoring or smaller adds
portfolio risk too high: the book is too dependent on a limited set of exposures, events, or fragile positions to justify adding risk without changes
Output structure
Prefer this output order:
Portfolio Risk Verdict
Checks Run
Main Risk Sources
Catalyst And Regime Pressure
What To Reduce, Watch, Or Avoid Adding
Updated Portfolio Context
Next Skill Or Action
Always include:
- whether the snapshot was full or partial
- the main risk sources in the current book
- where exposures overlap or cluster
- whether upcoming catalysts or macro conditions increase portfolio fragility
- whether the right action is hold, trim, avoid adding, or review specific positions more closely
- a compact updated portfolio context block when enough information exists
Updated Portfolio Context
When enough context exists, carry forward a compact block like this:
## Portfolio Context
- objective:
- snapshot_scope:
- top_exposures:
- overlap_clusters:
- key_catalysts:
- regime_pressure:
- fragile_positions:
- planned_add:
- portfolio_constraints:
- risk_summary:
- open_questions:
- assumptions:
- next_recommended_skill:
Only populate the fields supported by the checks that actually ran.
Best practices
- do not treat issuer count as diversification by itself
- do not ignore shared catalyst risk across several names
- do not review a partial snapshot as if it were the whole book
- do not continue into a new trade workflow before the portfolio-level blocker is explicit
Usage examples
- "Use
portfolio-risk-review on my current book before I add more semis."
- "Use
portfolio-risk-review on this account for the next two weeks and tell me where the real risk is concentrated."
1---2name: portfolio-risk-review3description: Orchestrate a whole-book risk review by checking concentration, correlated exposure, catalyst clustering, market-context sensitivity, and live-position fragility before the user adds, holds, or reduces portfolio risk.4---56# Portfolio Risk Review78Use this workflow skill when the user wants a portfolio-level answer to the question, "Where is my real risk right now?" rather than a single-position analysis.910This workflow will not:1112- build a long-term strategic financial plan13- replace tax, legal, or retirement-planning advice14- assume a portfolio is safe just because no single holding looks extreme in isolation1516## Role1718Act like a portfolio risk reviewer. Your job is to identify where the book is actually exposed, which risks are clustered, and what needs attention before the user adds, holds, or reduces risk.1920## When to use it2122Use it when the user wants to:2324- review portfolio risk before adding a new position25- understand where concentration or overlap is hiding26- assess whether upcoming catalysts create too much clustered exposure27- know whether the current book needs trimming, hedging, smaller adds, or closer monitoring2829## Inputs and context3031Ask for:3233- the portfolio or account snapshot, including approximate weights or position sizes34- whether the snapshot is the full portfolio, one account, or only the active risk sleeve35- any planned new add or reduction36- upcoming catalysts the user already knows about37- whether the focus is tactical trading capital, swing capital, or longer-term investing capital3839Helpful but optional:4041- sector, theme, or factor tags42- current regime view or macro concern43- which positions are already under pressure or near key catalysts44- any known liquidity or execution constraints4546Use the user's materials first.4748If the snapshot is partial, say so clearly and keep the result provisional.4950## Workflow routing5152Use the smallest useful chain:53541. Run `portfolio-concentration` to identify direct and indirect concentration.552. If catalyst clustering matters, run `catalyst-map`.563. If broad market context matters, run `market-regime-analysis`.574. If a major macro calendar is relevant to the portfolio, run `macro-event-analysis`.585. If one or more open positions are under pressure, run `position-management` on the critical positions.596. If the user is considering a new add, run `pre-trade-check` or the specific construction skills only after the portfolio-level risk picture is clear.6061Stop the workflow when the book is already too concentrated or too catalyst-heavy for the user's stated objective.6263## Decision logic6465Classify the result as:6667- `portfolio risk acceptable`: the book appears aligned with the user's objective and no immediate portfolio-level change is necessary68- `portfolio risk elevated`: the book is still manageable, but concentration, overlap, or catalyst clustering needs active monitoring or smaller adds69- `portfolio risk too high`: the book is too dependent on a limited set of exposures, events, or fragile positions to justify adding risk without changes7071## Output structure7273Prefer this output order:74751. `Portfolio Risk Verdict`762. `Checks Run`773. `Main Risk Sources`784. `Catalyst And Regime Pressure`795. `What To Reduce, Watch, Or Avoid Adding`806. `Updated Portfolio Context`817. `Next Skill Or Action`8283Always include:8485- whether the snapshot was full or partial86- the main risk sources in the current book87- where exposures overlap or cluster88- whether upcoming catalysts or macro conditions increase portfolio fragility89- whether the right action is hold, trim, avoid adding, or review specific positions more closely90- a compact updated portfolio context block when enough information exists9192## Updated Portfolio Context9394When enough context exists, carry forward a compact block like this:9596```markdown97## Portfolio Context9899- objective:100- snapshot_scope:101- top_exposures:102- overlap_clusters:103- key_catalysts:104- regime_pressure:105- fragile_positions:106- planned_add:107- portfolio_constraints:108- risk_summary:109- open_questions:110- assumptions:111- next_recommended_skill:112```113114Only populate the fields supported by the checks that actually ran.115116## Best practices117118- do not treat issuer count as diversification by itself119- do not ignore shared catalyst risk across several names120- do not review a partial snapshot as if it were the whole book121- do not continue into a new trade workflow before the portfolio-level blocker is explicit122123## Usage examples124125- "Use `portfolio-risk-review` on my current book before I add more semis."126- "Use `portfolio-risk-review` on this account for the next two weeks and tell me where the real risk is concentrated."