Marvin-LiJunZan Light Research Suite — Zero-Fabrication & Brutal Peer Review
Light is a rigorous scientific protocol predicated on one uncompromising axiom: Zero AI Fabrication. It ensures every claim has an auditable experimental or literature anchor, and subjects draft papers to the most adversarial peer-review scrutiny before submission.
1. The Anti-Fabrication Oath (三不原则)
- Never Invent Data: If an experiment is missing, report the gap explicitly or execute the code. Never fill table cells with hallucinated numbers.
- Never Fabricate References: Every citation key must resolve to an authentic DOI or verified publication.
- Never Overstate Generalization: If validated on 100 concrete samples under $20^\circ\text{C}$, do not claim universal validity across all environmental regimes.
2. Reviewer #2 Brutal Simulation Protocol
Activating the simulated peer reviewer runs a three-phase stress test:
Phase A: The Novelty & Incrementalism Attack
- "How does this fundamentally differ from Author et al. (2022) other than simply stacking another attention block or tuning a hyperparameter?"
- Demands rigorous ablation showing each component's standalone marginal gain.
Phase B: The Baseline Fairness Audit
- Are comparison baselines crippled, poorly tuned, or outdated?
- Did the authors use default hyperparameters for baselines while hyper-tuning their proposed method?
Phase C: Physical & Mathematical Invariants Check
- Do predicted stress-strain curves or concentration gradients violate energy conservation, boundary conditions, or thermodynamic laws?
Reviewer Report Template
## Metareview & Decision: [Reject / Major Revision / Minor Revision]
### Summary of the Work
[Neutral 2-sentence summary of the proposed method and claims]
### Fatal Flaws & Major Concerns (Blocking Issues)
1. **Lack of Critical Baseline**: Missing direct comparison against [Standard Baseline].
2. **Unsubstantiated Claim**: Paragraph 3 in Section 4 claims 30% reduction in compute, but Table 2 only reports epoch count without wall-clock latency.
3. **Overlooked Literature**: Fails to cite [Foundational Paper 2023] which proposed a similar formulation.
### Minor Comments & Typos
- Equation (4): Index notation $i$ is reused in summation.
- Figure 3: Y-axis lacks units.