Document Semantic Search

Document Semantic Search Skill

Overview

This skill provides semantic search across credit documentation using 4096-dimensional embeddings (Qwen3-Embedding-8B). It enables natural language queries to find relevant clauses, covenants, terms, and structures across assignments, credit agreements, fee letters, security agreements, and other credit documents. The system understands document metadata (type, company, deal) and extracts structured information from complex legal documents.

Process

🚀 High-Level Workflow

Using semantic search for credit documentation involves understanding the capabilities, crafting effective queries, and interpreting results:

Phase 1: Understand Core Capabilities

1.1 Semantic Document Search

• Natural language queries across credit document corpus
• 4096-dim vector embeddings for semantic similarity
• Configurable similarity thresholds and result limits
• Filtering by company, deal, or document metadata

1.2 Document Type Recognition

Automatically identifies and categorizes:

• Assignments: Assignment and assumption agreements, novations
• Covenant Documents: Covenant categories, examples, precedents, compliance certificates
• Credit Agreements: Syndicated loans, bilateral facilities, revolving credit facilities, term loans
• Collateral Documents: Security agreements, pledge agreements, mortgages, UCC filings
• Fee Letters: Upfront fees, commitment fees, utilization fees, amendment fees
• Legal Opinions: Enforceability opinions, non-contravention opinions, bankruptcy opinions
• Participations: Risk participations, funded participations, sub-participations
• Security Agreements: General security agreements, intellectual property security, account control

1.3 Covenant Extraction

Identifies and extracts:

• Financial Covenants: Leverage ratios, coverage ratios, liquidity tests, net worth requirements
• Affirmative Covenants: Reporting, compliance certificates, insurance, maintenance obligations
• Negative Covenants: Debt restrictions, lien limitations, dividend restrictions, M&A constraints
• Covenant Baskets: General baskets, grower baskets, starter baskets
• EBITDA Adjustments: Add-backs, pro forma adjustments, synergies, run-rate adjustments
• Covenant Relief: Amendment history, covenant suspension, equity cure rights

1.4 Collateral Analysis

Extracts collateral information:

• Collateral Types: First lien, second lien, unsecured, ABL, cash flow
• Asset Categories: Equipment, inventory, receivables, real estate, intellectual property
• Guarantees: Parent guarantees, subsidiary guarantees, upstream/downstream/cross-stream
• Perfection: UCC filings, control agreements, mortgages, trademark/patent assignments
• Release Provisions: Release conditions, automatic releases, partial releases
• Intercreditor Terms: Priority, payment waterfalls, standstill provisions

1.5 Metadata Extraction

Identifies key document attributes:

• Parties: Borrowers, lenders, agents, arrangers, guarantors
• Deal Structure: Facility types, tranches, commitments, maturities
• Pricing: Base rates, spreads, floors, grids, fee structures
• Dates: Closing date, maturity date, commitment termination, amendment dates
• Governing Law: Jurisdiction, venue, waiver of jury trial
• Cross-References: Related documents, incorporated terms, exhibit references

Phase 2: Craft Effective Queries

Load 📋 Query Optimization Guide for comprehensive query crafting strategies.

2.1 Query Optimization Techniques

Effective Queries:

• ✅ "first lien leverage ratio covenant with 5.0x maximum and quarterly step-downs"
• ✅ "security agreement covering equipment and inventory with ABL borrowing base"
• ✅ "assignment and assumption with minimum $5MM assignment amount"
• ✅ "upfront fees between 50-100bps for syndicated credit facilities"

Avoid overly broad or vague queries:

• ❌ "covenants"
• ❌ "loan documents"
• ❌ "fees"

2.2 Similarity Thresholds

• 0.5-0.6: Broad search, may include tangentially related content
• 0.6-0.7: Balanced search, good for exploratory research
• 0.7-0.8: Focused search, high relevance expected
• 0.8+: Very specific search, near-exact matches

2.3 Result Limits

• 3-5 results: Quick reference, specific precedent lookup
• 10-15 results: Standard research, comprehensive coverage
• 20+ results: Exhaustive search, building precedent library

2.4 Multi-Query Strategies

Break complex research into focused queries:

# Instead of:
"financial covenants, pricing, fees, and security for healthcare companies"

# Use multiple focused queries:
query1 = "financial covenants in healthcare credit agreements"
query2 = "pricing grids and interest rate spreads for healthcare borrowers"
query3 = "upfront fees and commitment fees in healthcare facilities"
query4 = "security agreements and collateral packages for healthcare companies"

Phase 3: Execute Common Workflows

3.1 Covenant Precedent Research

Scenario: Need to draft financial covenant package for healthcare borrower

Workflow:

# Step 1: Find financial covenant examples
financial = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="financial covenants including leverage ratio, coverage ratio, and liquidity test",
    limit=10,
    min_similarity=0.6
)

# Step 2: Find EBITDA definition precedents
ebitda = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="EBITDA definition with add-backs for non-recurring charges and pro forma adjustments",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

# Step 3: Find covenant basket structures
baskets = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="general debt baskets and grower baskets with builder mechanisms",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.65
)

# Step 4: Find cure right provisions
cures = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="equity cure rights with limitations on frequency and amount",
    limit=3,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

3.2 Collateral Package Analysis

Scenario: Evaluating security package for manufacturing company

Workflow:

# Step 1: Review security agreement structure
security = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="security agreement covering all assets with standard exclusions",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.6
)

# Step 2: Check guarantee requirements
guarantees = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="guarantee by subsidiaries with exceptions for immaterial subs and foreign subs",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.65
)

# Step 3: Review perfection requirements
perfection = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="UCC-1 filings and control agreements for deposit accounts",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

# Step 4: Check release provisions
releases = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="collateral release upon achievement of leverage ratio or investment grade rating",
    limit=3,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

3.3 Fee Structure Benchmarking

Scenario: Negotiating fee letter for syndicated facility

Workflow:

# Step 1: Benchmark upfront fees
upfront = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="upfront fees for syndicated credit facility with 50bps to 100bps range",
    limit=10,
    min_similarity=0.6
)

# Step 2: Review commitment fee structures
commitment = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="commitment fees on undrawn amounts with utilization grid",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.65
)

# Step 3: Find amendment fee precedents
amendments = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="consent fees for amendments ranging from 10bps to 25bps",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.6
)

# Step 4: Check administrative agent fees
admin_fees = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="administrative agent fees and fronting fees for letters of credit",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.65
)

3.4 Legal Opinion Requirements

Scenario: Determining scope of legal opinions needed

Workflow:

1. Query: "legal opinion requirements in credit agreements with enforceability and non-contravention"
2. Review standard opinion deliverables
3. Identify customary assumptions and qualifications
4. Compare opinion scope across jurisdictions
5. Extract specific opinion language and riders

3.5 Amendment Precedents

Scenario: Negotiating covenant modification

Workflow:

1. Query: "amendment agreements modifying financial covenants with pricing adjustments"
2. Review typical amendment structures
3. Compare consent fee levels
4. Identify negotiated covenant relief mechanisms
5. Extract amendment execution provisions

3.6 Participation Structures

Scenario: Structuring risk participation agreement

Workflow:

# Step 1: Review assignment mechanics
assignments = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="assignment and assumption agreement with minimum assignment amounts and consent requirements",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

# Step 2: Compare participation structures
participations = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="participation agreement with voting rights restrictions and confidentiality obligations",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

# Step 3: Check information rights
info_rights = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="information rights for participants versus assignees with sharing restrictions",
    limit=3,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

3.7 Intercreditor Research

Scenario: Analyzing intercreditor relationships

Workflow:

# Step 1: Find intercreditor agreement templates
intercreditor = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="intercreditor agreement between first lien and second lien lenders with payment waterfall",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

# Step 2: Review standstill provisions
standstill = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="standstill period for junior lenders with 180 day restriction on enforcement",
    limit=3,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

# Step 3: Check lien priorities
priorities = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="lien priority and subordination terms with automatic release provisions",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.65
)

Phase 4: Interpret and Apply Results

4.1 Result Interpretation Best Practices

• Context Matters: Read surrounding text, not just matched snippet
• Multiple Sources: Confirm patterns across multiple documents
• Evolution: Consider date of precedent and market evolution
• Customization: Recognize borrower-specific vs. market-standard terms

4.2 Search Workflow

1. Start Broad: Begin with higher-level queries to scope the domain
2. Refine Focus: Use initial results to craft more specific queries
3. Cross-Reference: Validate findings across multiple documents
4. Extract and Compare: Pull specific clauses for side-by-side comparison
5. Document Sources: Track precedent sources for later reference

4.3 Troubleshooting

Low-Quality Results:

• Increase min_similarity threshold (try 0.7+)
• Make query more specific with technical terms
• Use metadata filters to narrow scope
• Break complex query into focused sub-queries

No Results Found:

• Decrease min_similarity threshold (try 0.5)
• Broaden query with more general terms
• Check if documents exist for that category
• Verify metadata filters aren't too restrictive

Too Many Results:

• Increase min_similarity to filter lower-quality matches
• Add more specificity to query
• Use metadata filters (company, deal, document type)
• Reduce limit parameter

Inconsistent Results:

• Embedding search is probabilistic, slight variations expected
• Use consistent terminology across queries
• Review and improve source document quality
• Consider metadata filtering for deterministic results

Reference

Key Functions

semantic_search_credit_documents(query_text, limit, min_similarity, company_id, deal_id)

Purpose: Natural language search across credit document embeddings

Parameters:

• query_text: Natural language query (e.g., "leverage covenant with step-downs")
• limit: Maximum results to return (default: 10)
• min_similarity: Similarity threshold 0-1 (default: 0.5)
• company_id: Optional UUID to filter by company
• deal_id: Optional UUID to filter by deal

Returns:

• Document chunks with similarity scores
• Full context around matched text
• Metadata (document type, company, deal)
• Source document identifiers

Example:

# Find leverage covenant examples
results = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="first lien leverage ratio covenant with 5.0x maximum and quarterly step-downs",
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

# Results include:
# - Matched text with surrounding context
# - Similarity scores (0.7-1.0)
# - Document type (credit_agreement, covenant_example)
# - Company and deal identifiers
# - Chunk position in source document

search_credit_documents_by_metadata(company_id, deal_id, document_id, limit)

Purpose: Filter documents by metadata without semantic search

Parameters:

• company_id: Company UUID (optional)
• deal_id: Deal UUID (optional)
• document_id: Document UUID (optional)
• limit: Maximum results (default: 20)

Returns:

• All chunks matching metadata filters
• Useful for retrieving complete documents
• No similarity scoring

Example:

# Get all documents for a specific deal
deal_docs = search_credit_documents_by_metadata(
    deal_id="550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000",
    limit=100
)

# Get all documents for a specific company
company_docs = search_credit_documents_by_metadata(
    company_id="c0e5f278-20bd-4eec-95e3-76877126b4c9",
    limit=50
)

# Get specific document
doc = search_credit_documents_by_metadata(
    document_id="7f3d8f29-1b4e-4c8a-9a2e-5e6f7a8b9c0d"
)

search_arda_knowledge(query, node_types, limit, min_similarity)

Purpose: Search Arda's internal knowledge base (211 markdown documents)

Parameters:

• query: Natural language query
• node_types: Filter by ["concept", "section", "document", "entity"]
• limit: Maximum results (default: 10)
• min_similarity: Similarity threshold (default: 0.6)

Returns:

• Relevant knowledge base content
• Arda product documentation
• Process guides and best practices
• Team information and responsibilities

Example:

# Search Arda product documentation
results = search_arda_knowledge(
    query="How does Arda Execute handle settlement workflows?",
    node_types=["concept", "section"],
    limit=5,
    min_similarity=0.7
)

# Find team responsibilities
team_info = search_arda_knowledge(
    query="Who is responsible for covenant monitoring?",
    limit=3
)

get_arda_document(file_path)

Purpose: Retrieve specific Arda documentation by path

Parameters:

• file_path: Document path (e.g., "Arda Global HQ/Product/Execute/Overview.md")

Returns:

• Full document content
• Document metadata
• Category and structure information

Example:

# Get specific product documentation
doc = get_arda_document(
    "Arda Global HQ/Product/Execute/Overview.md"
)

# Get technical specifications
tech_doc = get_arda_document(
    "Arda Global HQ/Technical/API/Authentication.md"
)

list_arda_documents(category, limit)

Purpose: Browse Arda documentation by category

Parameters:

• category: Filter by category ("Product", "Team", "Technical", etc.)
• limit: Maximum results (default: 50)

Returns:

• List of available documents
• Document titles and paths
• Category organization

Example:

# List all product documentation
product_docs = list_arda_documents(
    category="Product",
    limit=20
)

# List all documents
all_docs = list_arda_documents()

get_document_embeddings_stats()

Purpose: Get statistics about document embedding collection

Parameters: None

Returns:

• Total number of documents
• Vector dimensions (4096)
• Collection metadata
• Sample data structure

Example:

# Check corpus statistics
stats = get_document_embeddings_stats()

# Returns:
# {
#   "total_documents": 1247,
#   "vector_dimensions": 4096,
#   "embedding_model": "Qwen3-Embedding-8B",
#   "sample_structure": {...}
# }

Document Type Metadata Schema

Assignment Documents

{
  "document_type": "assignment",
  "assignment_type": "assignment_and_assumption",
  "parties": {
    "assignor": "Original Lender",
    "assignee": "New Lender",
    "borrower": "Company Name",
    "administrative_agent": "Agent Bank"
  },
  "assignment_amount": 5000000,
  "purchase_price": 4950000,
  "effective_date": "2024-03-15",
  "consent_required": true
}

Credit Agreement

{
  "document_type": "credit_agreement",
  "agreement_type": "syndicated_credit_facility",
  "borrower": "Company Name",
  "facilities": [
    {
      "type": "revolving",
      "commitment": 100000000,
      "maturity": "2029-03-15"
    },
    {
      "type": "term_loan",
      "principal": 200000000,
      "maturity": "2030-03-15"
    }
  ],
  "financial_covenants": ["leverage_ratio", "coverage_ratio"],
  "governing_law": "New York"
}

Security Agreement

{
  "document_type": "security_agreement",
  "security_type": "general_security_agreement",
  "grantor": "Company Name",
  "secured_party": "Administrative Agent",
  "collateral_types": [
    "equipment",
    "inventory",
    "accounts_receivable",
    "intellectual_property"
  ],
  "lien_priority": "first_lien",
  "perfection_method": ["ucc_filing", "control_agreement"]
}

Fee Letter

{
  "document_type": "fee_letter",
  "borrower": "Company Name",
  "administrative_agent": "Agent Bank",
  "fees": {
    "upfront_fee": {
      "amount_bps": 75,
      "calculation_base": "total_commitments"
    },
    "commitment_fee": {
      "amount_bps": 30,
      "calculation_base": "undrawn_commitments"
    },
    "administrative_agent_fee": {
      "amount": 50000,
      "frequency": "annual"
    }
  }
}

Covenant Document

{
  "document_type": "covenant_category",
  "covenant_type": "financial_covenant",
  "covenant_name": "first_lien_leverage_ratio",
  "test_type": "maintenance",
  "test_frequency": "quarterly",
  "maximum_ratio": 5.0,
  "step_downs": [
    {"date": "2025-12-31", "ratio": 4.75},
    {"date": "2026-12-31", "ratio": 4.50}
  ],
  "cure_rights": true
}

Covenant Taxonomy

Financial Covenants

Leverage Ratios

• Total Leverage: Total Debt / EBITDA
• First Lien Leverage: First Lien Debt / EBITDA
• Senior Secured Leverage: Senior Secured Debt / EBITDA
• Net Leverage: (Total Debt - Unrestricted Cash) / EBITDA
• Secured Leverage: Secured Debt / EBITDA

Coverage Ratios

• Interest Coverage: EBITDA / Interest Expense
• Fixed Charge Coverage: (EBITDA - CapEx - Taxes) / (Interest + Scheduled Principal)
• Debt Service Coverage: (EBITDA - CapEx) / (Interest + Principal)

Liquidity Tests

• Minimum Liquidity: Cash + Revolver Availability ≥ Threshold
• Minimum EBITDA: EBITDA ≥ Threshold
• Minimum Revenue: Revenue ≥ Threshold

Balance Sheet Tests

• Minimum Net Worth: Tangible Net Worth ≥ Threshold
• Maximum CapEx: Capital Expenditures ≤ Threshold
• Minimum Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities ≥ Threshold

Negative Covenants

Debt Restrictions

• Maximum Total Debt: Cap on aggregate indebtedness
• Debt Baskets: Permitted debt categories and amounts
• Ratio-Based Debt: Incurrence-based debt tied to leverage ratios
• Grower Baskets: Baskets that increase over time

Lien Restrictions

• Negative Pledge: General prohibition on liens
• Permitted Liens: Specific lien categories allowed
• Equal and Ratable: Requirement to share security

Restricted Payments

• Dividend Restrictions: Limitations on dividends and distributions
• Ratio-Based Payments: Payments tied to leverage tests
• Builder Baskets: Baskets built from retained cash flow

M&A Restrictions

• Acquisition Limitations: Caps on acquisition spending
• Asset Sale Restrictions: Limitations on dispositions
• Permitted Acquisitions: Specific acquisition criteria

Affirmative Covenants

• Financial Reporting: Quarterly/annual financials, compliance certificates
• Notice Requirements: Event of default notices, material change notices
• Insurance: Property, liability, business interruption coverage
• Maintenance: Property maintenance, corporate existence
• Compliance: Legal compliance, environmental compliance

Collateral Type Taxonomy

Asset-Based Collateral

• Accounts Receivable: Trade receivables, contract rights
• Inventory: Raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods
• Equipment: Machinery, vehicles, furniture, fixtures
• Real Estate: Owned properties, leasehold interests

Cash Flow Collateral

• All Assets: Blanket lien on all present and future assets
• Intellectual Property: Patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets
• Equity Interests: Stock pledges, membership interests
• Contract Rights: Material contracts, licenses

Perfection Methods

• UCC-1 Filings: State-level financing statements
• Control Agreements: Deposit accounts, securities accounts
• Mortgages: Real property liens
• IP Assignments: USPTO, Copyright Office recordings
• Stock Pledges: Certificated and uncertificated securities

Output Structure

Semantic Search Results

{
  "results": [
    {
      "chunk_id": "uuid",
      "content": "Section 7.11 Financial Covenants. The Borrower shall not permit...",
      "similarity_score": 0.83,
      "metadata": {
        "document_id": "uuid",
        "document_type": "credit_agreement",
        "company_id": "uuid",
        "company_name": "Healthcare Corp",
        "deal_id": "uuid",
        "deal_name": "2024 Refinancing",
        "chunk_position": 142,
        "total_chunks": 250
      },
      "context": {
        "preceding_text": "...",
        "following_text": "..."
      }
    }
  ],
  "query": "financial covenants with leverage ratio",
  "total_results": 15,
  "search_time_ms": 45
}

Metadata Search Results

{
  "results": [
    {
      "chunk_id": "uuid",
      "content": "Full chunk text...",
      "metadata": {
        "document_id": "uuid",
        "document_type": "security_agreement",
        "company_id": "uuid",
        "deal_id": "uuid",
        "chunk_position": 23,
        "total_chunks": 89
      }
    }
  ],
  "filters_applied": {
    "company_id": "c0e5f278-20bd-4eec-95e3-76877126b4c9",
    "deal_id": null,
    "document_id": null
  },
  "total_results": 89
}

Integration with Other Skills

With Knowledge Graph Research

# Step 1: Semantic search for covenant precedents
covenant_docs = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="financial maintenance covenants",
    limit=20
)

# Step 2: Extract text from results
texts = [chunk['content'] for chunk in covenant_docs]

# Step 3: Build knowledge graph
from knowledge_graph_skill import analyze_text_network
graph = analyze_text_network(
    texts=texts,
    context_name="covenant_structures"
)

# Step 4: Identify gaps in covenant coverage
gaps = detect_discourse_gaps(
    texts=texts,
    context_name="covenant_gaps"
)

With SEC Intelligence

# Find credit agreement for a company
agreements = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="credit agreement",
    company_id=company_uuid
)

# Get SEC financials for the same company
from sec_skill import get_sec_company_financials
financials = get_sec_company_financials(
    company_identifier="TICKER",
    metrics=["Assets", "Liabilities", "Revenue"]
)

# Compare covenant levels to actual financials

With Counterparty Network

# Find participation agreements
participations = semantic_search_credit_documents(
    query_text="participation agreement with risk participation structure"
)

# Map counterparty relationships
from counterparty_skill import create_company_exposure
# Create exposure relationships based on participation agreements

Advanced Features

Fuzzy Matching

The embedding model handles variations:

• "leverage ratio" matches "total leverage ratio", "consolidated leverage ratio"
• "EBITDA" matches "Adjusted EBITDA", "Consolidated EBITDA"
• Handles synonyms: "borrower" and "obligor", "lender" and "bank"

Contextual Understanding

Queries understand context and relationships:

• "springing covenant" → understands it applies only when revolver is drawn
• "equity cure" → understands relationship to covenant defaults
• "grower basket" → understands builder/growth mechanisms

Multi-Lingual Support

While primary corpus is English, the embedding model can handle:

• Latin legal phrases (in pari passu, pari passu, pro rata)
• Financial acronyms (EBITDA, CapEx, GAAP, IFRS)
• Cross-border terminology

Limitations & Considerations

Embedding Limitations

• 4096-dim embeddings are high-quality but not perfect
• Very rare or highly technical terms may not embed well
• OCR errors in source documents affect search quality
• Context window of embedding model affects very long passages

Metadata Dependency

• Search quality depends on accurate document tagging
• Missing or incorrect metadata limits filtering effectiveness
• Company/deal linkage requires proper UUID assignment

Legal Considerations

• Semantic search finds similar language, not legal advice
• Always review full document context and cross-references
• Consult legal counsel for interpretation and application
• Precedents may not be appropriate for specific situations

Corpus Coverage

• Results limited to documents in the corpus
• New or innovative structures may have limited precedents
• Market evolution means older precedents may be outdated
• Geographic/jurisdictional coverage varies

Best Practices

Document Preparation

When adding documents to the corpus:

• Use clean, OCR-corrected text
• Preserve structural formatting (headings, sections)
• Include complete documents, not excerpts
• Tag with accurate metadata (company, deal, document type)
• Chunk at logical boundaries (sections, articles, clauses)

Metadata Consistency

Maintain consistent metadata across documents:

• Document Types: Use standardized taxonomy
• Company IDs: Link to knowledge graph entities
• Deal IDs: Track related documents by transaction
• Dates: Capture execution date, effective date, maturity

Future Enhancements

Planned Features

• Named entity extraction for parties, dates, amounts
• Automatic covenant categorization and tagging
• Cross-document comparison and diff generation
• Temporal analysis of covenant evolution
• Automated precedent summarization

Integration Roadmap

• Direct SurrealDB storage of document relationships
• Real-time document ingestion and embedding
• Hybrid search (semantic + keyword + metadata)
• Custom embedding fine-tuning for legal documents
• Multi-modal search (text + tabular data)

Reference Files

📚 Documentation Library

Load these resources as needed during semantic search operations:

Core Guides (Load First)

• 📋 Query Optimization Guide - Comprehensive guide on crafting effective semantic search queries including:

  • Query specificity and domain terminology
  • Similarity threshold selection
  • Multi-query strategies
  • Common query patterns by use case
  • Advanced query techniques

• 📄 Document Preparation Guide - Best practices for preparing credit documents for semantic search including:

  • Document quality requirements
  • Metadata tagging standards
  • Document chunking strategies
  • Quality control checklists
  • Common issues and solutions

• ✅ Best Practices Guide - Complete best practices for using semantic search including:

  • Search workflow patterns
  • Result interpretation guidelines
  • Metadata filtering strategies
  • Integration with other skills
  • Quality assurance techniques

Skill Version: 1.0 Last Updated: 2025-01-06 Maintained By: Arda Insights Team Dependencies: IRL Vector DB (Qwen3-Embedding-8B), ONTO-RA, arda-insights MCP server Embedding Model: Qwen3-Embedding-8B (4096 dimensions) Vector Database: IRL (Integration Ready Layer)