Business Process Design
Process Discovery Framework
Step 1 — Define Scope
- Start point: what triggers the process?
- End point: what is the final deliverable or state?
- Owners: who is accountable for the end-to-end outcome?
- Stakeholders: who participates or is affected?
- Frequency: how often does this run? (per transaction / daily / weekly)
Step 2 — As-Is Mapping (Current State)
- Interview process owners and frontline operators separately
- Shadow the process live — don't rely on documentation alone
- Capture every handoff: where work moves between people or systems
- Note informal fixes, workarounds, and shadow tools
- Record timing for each step (optimistic / typical / worst case)
Step 3 — Bottleneck Analysis
| Signal |
Likely bottleneck |
| Work piles up before a step |
Capacity constraint at that step |
| Long wait times between steps |
Approval dependency or unclear ownership |
| High rework rates |
Ambiguous inputs or missing specifications |
| Frequent escalations |
Decision authority not delegated low enough |
| Duplicate work across teams |
Missing single source of truth |
Step 4 — To-Be Design
- Remove: steps that add no value from the customer perspective
- Automate: repetitive, rule-based steps with structured inputs
- Simplify: steps that require judgment but could be standardized
- Parallel: steps currently sequential that have no true dependency
- Delegate: decisions pushed too high that could be made at execution level
BPMN Notation Quick Reference
Core Symbols
| Symbol |
Name |
Use |
| Circle (thin) |
Start Event |
Process begins |
| Circle (thick) |
End Event |
Process ends |
| Rounded rectangle |
Task |
Work performed by an actor |
| Diamond |
Gateway |
Decision or fork point |
| Rectangle with lines |
Sub-Process |
Collapsed complex process |
| Dashed arrow |
Message Flow |
Communication between pools |
| Solid arrow |
Sequence Flow |
Task ordering |
Gateway Types
- Exclusive (X) — one path taken, based on condition
- Parallel (+) — all paths taken simultaneously
- Inclusive (O) — one or more paths based on condition
Swimlane Structure
Pool: [Company]
Lane: [Sales] → owns deal qualification, proposal
Lane: [Legal] → owns contract review, redlines
Lane: [Finance] → owns deal desk approval, invoicing
Lane: [Customer] → external participant (dashed pool)
SLA Design
SLA Template
Process: [Name]
SLA Owner: [Role]
Measurement period: [daily / weekly / monthly]
Tier 1 — Standard:
Target: respond within 4 business hours
Resolution: within 2 business days
Applies to: [low-priority tickets / routine requests]
Tier 2 — Priority:
Target: respond within 1 business hour
Resolution: within 4 business hours
Applies to: [high-value accounts / escalations]
Tier 3 — Critical:
Target: respond within 15 minutes
Resolution: within 2 hours
Applies to: [production outages / revenue-blocking issues]
SLA Metrics
| Metric |
Formula |
Target |
| SLA Attainment |
# tickets resolved within SLA / total tickets |
≥ 95% |
| MTTR (Mean Time to Resolve) |
Total resolution time / # tickets |
Per tier target |
| Breach Rate |
# SLA breaches / total tickets |
< 5% |
| Escalation Rate |
# escalated / total tickets |
< 10% |
Automation Opportunity Assessment
Automation Readiness Checklist
Automation ROI Formula
Annual manual cost = (avg minutes per case / 60) × hourly rate × annual volume
Automation cost = build cost + annual maintenance
Break-even = automation cost / (annual manual cost - automation run cost)
Priority Matrix
| Frequency |
Manual effort |
Automation priority |
| High |
High |
P0 — automate immediately |
| High |
Low |
P2 — consider if low build cost |
| Low |
High |
P1 — automate or outsource |
| Low |
Low |
P3 — leave manual |
Process Documentation Standard
SOP Structure
Title: [Process Name]
Version: 1.x
Owner: [Role]
Last reviewed: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Next review: [YYYY-MM-DD]
1. Purpose
One sentence: what does this process accomplish?
2. Scope
Who does this apply to? What is included / excluded?
3. Inputs
List required inputs, formats, and source systems.
4. Steps
Step 1: [Action] → [Actor] → [Output/Artifact]
Step 2: ...
5. Decision points
If [condition] → go to step X
If [condition] → escalate to [Role]
6. Outputs
List deliverables, where they are stored, who receives them.
7. Exceptions
Document known edge cases and handling procedures.
8. Related documents
Link to: upstream processes, downstream processes, policy docs.
Document Control
- Store in single authoritative location (wiki, Notion, Confluence)
- Assign a process owner responsible for quarterly review
- Version with date + author in header
- Archive superseded versions — don't delete
Process Improvement Methodologies
Lean — Waste Categories (TIMWOOD)
- Transportation — moving information unnecessarily
- Inventory — work items waiting in queues
- Motion — people navigating between systems
- Waiting — idle time between steps
- Over-production — producing more than needed
- Over-processing — more steps than required
- Defects — errors requiring rework
Six Sigma DMAIC
- Define — charter, SIPOC, voice of customer
- Measure — baseline current performance, collect data
- Analyze — root cause analysis (fishbone, 5-why)
- Improve — pilot improvements, validate with data
- Control — standardize, hand off with monitoring plan
Kaizen Event Structure (5-day)
| Day |
Activity |
| 1 |
Current state mapping, problem definition |
| 2 |
Root cause analysis, solution brainstorm |
| 3 |
Pilot and test solutions |
| 4 |
Implement and document |
| 5 |
Report out, set 30-day follow-up actions |
Governance
Process Review Cadence
| Process type |
Review frequency |
| Customer-facing |
Quarterly |
| Regulatory / compliance |
Annually (or when regulation changes) |
| Internal operational |
Semi-annually |
| Incident-driven |
After every major incident |
Change Control
- Submit process change request with: what, why, impact assessment
- Review by process owner + key stakeholders
- Pilot on limited scope before full rollout
- Update documentation before go-live
- Communicate to all affected parties
- Monitor for 30 days post-change
1---2name: process-design3description: When to activate: business process mapping, BPMN diagrams, swimlane flows, SLA design, bottleneck identification, process automation, workflow documentation, SOPs4---56# Business Process Design78## Process Discovery Framework910### Step 1 — Define Scope11- Start point: what triggers the process?12- End point: what is the final deliverable or state?13- Owners: who is accountable for the end-to-end outcome?14- Stakeholders: who participates or is affected?15- Frequency: how often does this run? (per transaction / daily / weekly)1617### Step 2 — As-Is Mapping (Current State)181. Interview process owners and frontline operators separately192. Shadow the process live — don't rely on documentation alone203. Capture every handoff: where work moves between people or systems214. Note informal fixes, workarounds, and shadow tools225. Record timing for each step (optimistic / typical / worst case)2324### Step 3 — Bottleneck Analysis25| Signal | Likely bottleneck |26|--------|------------------|27| Work piles up before a step | Capacity constraint at that step |28| Long wait times between steps | Approval dependency or unclear ownership |29| High rework rates | Ambiguous inputs or missing specifications |30| Frequent escalations | Decision authority not delegated low enough |31| Duplicate work across teams | Missing single source of truth |3233### Step 4 — To-Be Design34- Remove: steps that add no value from the customer perspective35- Automate: repetitive, rule-based steps with structured inputs36- Simplify: steps that require judgment but could be standardized37- Parallel: steps currently sequential that have no true dependency38- Delegate: decisions pushed too high that could be made at execution level3940---4142## BPMN Notation Quick Reference4344### Core Symbols45| Symbol | Name | Use |46|--------|------|-----|47| Circle (thin) | Start Event | Process begins |48| Circle (thick) | End Event | Process ends |49| Rounded rectangle | Task | Work performed by an actor |50| Diamond | Gateway | Decision or fork point |51| Rectangle with lines | Sub-Process | Collapsed complex process |52| Dashed arrow | Message Flow | Communication between pools |53| Solid arrow | Sequence Flow | Task ordering |5455### Gateway Types56- **Exclusive (X)** — one path taken, based on condition57- **Parallel (+)** — all paths taken simultaneously58- **Inclusive (O)** — one or more paths based on condition5960### Swimlane Structure61```62Pool: [Company]63 Lane: [Sales] → owns deal qualification, proposal64 Lane: [Legal] → owns contract review, redlines65 Lane: [Finance] → owns deal desk approval, invoicing66 Lane: [Customer] → external participant (dashed pool)67```6869---7071## SLA Design7273### SLA Template74```75Process: [Name]76SLA Owner: [Role]77Measurement period: [daily / weekly / monthly]7879Tier 1 — Standard:80 Target: respond within 4 business hours81 Resolution: within 2 business days82 Applies to: [low-priority tickets / routine requests]8384Tier 2 — Priority:85 Target: respond within 1 business hour86 Resolution: within 4 business hours87 Applies to: [high-value accounts / escalations]8889Tier 3 — Critical:90 Target: respond within 15 minutes91 Resolution: within 2 hours92 Applies to: [production outages / revenue-blocking issues]93```9495### SLA Metrics96| Metric | Formula | Target |97|--------|---------|--------|98| SLA Attainment | # tickets resolved within SLA / total tickets | ≥ 95% |99| MTTR (Mean Time to Resolve) | Total resolution time / # tickets | Per tier target |100| Breach Rate | # SLA breaches / total tickets | < 5% |101| Escalation Rate | # escalated / total tickets | < 10% |102103---104105## Automation Opportunity Assessment106107### Automation Readiness Checklist108- [ ] Input is structured or can be made structured109- [ ] Rules for processing are explicit and documented110- [ ] Exceptions are predictable and < 15% of volume111- [ ] Process runs frequently enough to justify build cost112- [ ] Regulatory requirements allow automation113- [ ] Rollback plan exists if automation fails114115### Automation ROI Formula116```117Annual manual cost = (avg minutes per case / 60) × hourly rate × annual volume118Automation cost = build cost + annual maintenance119Break-even = automation cost / (annual manual cost - automation run cost)120```121122### Priority Matrix123| Frequency | Manual effort | Automation priority |124|-----------|--------------|-------------------|125| High | High | P0 — automate immediately |126| High | Low | P2 — consider if low build cost |127| Low | High | P1 — automate or outsource |128| Low | Low | P3 — leave manual |129130---131132## Process Documentation Standard133134### SOP Structure135```136Title: [Process Name]137Version: 1.x138Owner: [Role]139Last reviewed: [YYYY-MM-DD]140Next review: [YYYY-MM-DD]1411421. Purpose143 One sentence: what does this process accomplish?1441452. Scope146 Who does this apply to? What is included / excluded?1471483. Inputs149 List required inputs, formats, and source systems.1501514. Steps152 Step 1: [Action] → [Actor] → [Output/Artifact]153 Step 2: ...1541555. Decision points156 If [condition] → go to step X157 If [condition] → escalate to [Role]1581596. Outputs160 List deliverables, where they are stored, who receives them.1611627. Exceptions163 Document known edge cases and handling procedures.1641658. Related documents166 Link to: upstream processes, downstream processes, policy docs.167```168169### Document Control170- Store in single authoritative location (wiki, Notion, Confluence)171- Assign a process owner responsible for quarterly review172- Version with date + author in header173- Archive superseded versions — don't delete174175---176177## Process Improvement Methodologies178179### Lean — Waste Categories (TIMWOOD)180- **T**ransportation — moving information unnecessarily181- **I**nventory — work items waiting in queues182- **M**otion — people navigating between systems183- **W**aiting — idle time between steps184- **O**ver-production — producing more than needed185- **O**ver-processing — more steps than required186- **D**efects — errors requiring rework187188### Six Sigma DMAIC1891. **Define** — charter, SIPOC, voice of customer1902. **Measure** — baseline current performance, collect data1913. **Analyze** — root cause analysis (fishbone, 5-why)1924. **Improve** — pilot improvements, validate with data1935. **Control** — standardize, hand off with monitoring plan194195### Kaizen Event Structure (5-day)196| Day | Activity |197|-----|----------|198| 1 | Current state mapping, problem definition |199| 2 | Root cause analysis, solution brainstorm |200| 3 | Pilot and test solutions |201| 4 | Implement and document |202| 5 | Report out, set 30-day follow-up actions |203204---205206## Governance207208### Process Review Cadence209| Process type | Review frequency |210|-------------|-----------------|211| Customer-facing | Quarterly |212| Regulatory / compliance | Annually (or when regulation changes) |213| Internal operational | Semi-annually |214| Incident-driven | After every major incident |215216### Change Control2171. Submit process change request with: what, why, impact assessment2182. Review by process owner + key stakeholders2193. Pilot on limited scope before full rollout2204. Update documentation before go-live2215. Communicate to all affected parties2226. Monitor for 30 days post-change