Crossfade Container Sizes To The Visible Child

What a crossfade measures

Crossfade composes both children while it runs. The container it puts them in is an ordinary Box with the default alignment, which means: size = the largest child on screen right now, position = top-start. Both defaults are invisible while the children are the same size — an icon swapping for another icon — and both bite the moment they are not.

// adapted — the parent owns the frame; each branch fills it and centres inside it
Box(modifier = modifier.height(16.dp), contentAlignment = Alignment.Center) {
    Crossfade(targetState = loading, label = "trackState") { isLoading ->
        // Both branches are boxed to the full height and centred, so the crossfade's own Box
        // never changes size and neither child can be pinned to the top of it.
        Box(Modifier.fillMaxSize(), contentAlignment = Alignment.Center) {
            if (isLoading) {
                LinearProgressIndicator(
                    Modifier.fillMaxWidth().height(trackHeight).clip(RoundedCornerShape(8.dp)),
                    color = progressColor, trackColor = idleColor, strokeCap = StrokeCap.Round,
                )
            } else {
                Slider(…)                       // taller: it reserves room for its thumb
            }
        }
    }
}

Traps

The symptom is "the bar falls into place", and it happens on the way out, not the way in. Fade a 2dp indicator in over a taller slider: while both are composed the container is as tall as the slider, and the indicator — top-aligned — sits at the top of that space. When the slider finally leaves composition the container shrinks to the indicator's own height and the parent re-centres it, so the bar drops a few pixels after the fade has finished. It reads as a layout glitch, which is why nobody looks at the crossfade.

Fix it with a frame, not with an alignment. Passing Alignment.Center to the crossfade's own Box only centres within a box that is still changing size, so the drop becomes a smaller drop. Give the crossfade a parent with a fixed height and make each branch fill it — then the container measures the same in every state and there is nothing to animate.

Replace the two renderers; do not stack them. The instinct for "show buffered progress under the seek position" is a progress indicator behind a slider. They do not measure alike: a slider reserves room for its thumb's travel at both ends while a bare indicator runs edge to edge, so with identical horizontal padding the two tracks are visibly different lengths and out of line. Either compensate with deliberately unequal padding (see custom-thin-media-slider, which does exactly that and explains the numbers) or accept that only one of them is ever on screen and crossfade between them — which is also what makes the sizing trap above appear.

Never crossfade a control the user is trying to touch. Both copies exist during the fade and the outgoing one is still hit-testable, so a tap can land on the control that is disappearing; worse, if the incoming branch is the interactive one, the control is unusable for the whole duration. Fade only the layer that changes and leave the interactive one mounted.

Same-sized children are the harmless case, and that is most of them. A tree can hold a hundred crossfades — icon-for-icon, label-for-label — and none of them needs a frame, because the container never changes size and top-start is indistinguishable from anything else. That is exactly why the handful that do swap different-sized children never get noticed: the pattern has a long track record of working. Audit by size difference, not by count.

A crossfade animates on the value, not on the content. The default treats the state value itself as the key, so two different-looking children produced from equal values do not cross-fade at all — they swap on the next frame. If a branch is chosen by something other than the value you passed (a captured flag, a size class), pass that as the state or the animation silently never runs.

Both branches are alive for the whole transition, side effects included. The outgoing child is still composed while it fades, so its LaunchedEffects keep running, its requests keep going, and its disposal is deferred until the fade ends. On cheap content this is invisible; on a branch that starts work when it enters composition it means the work runs twice, overlapping. If a branch owns something expensive, start that work above the crossfade and pass the result in.

Boxing both branches is also what makes the colours land. Once the branches share a frame they can share the same width and corner radius, so the two states line up pixel for pixel. A track that changes length or radius across the fade reads as two different controls swapping, not as one control changing state — see progress-indicator-as-scrubber for the pair of renderers this usually is.

Verifying it

# 1. the container's alignment and measure policy, straight out of the artifact
AN=$(find ~/.gradle/caches -name 'animation-desktop-*.jar' | head -1)
javap -c -p -classpath "$AN" androidx.compose.animation.CrossfadeKt \
  | grep -E 'Alignment\$Companion.getTopStart|maybeCachedBoxMeasurePolicy' | head -4

# 2. every crossfade in the tree
grep -rn --include='*.kt' 'Crossfade(' . | wc -l

# 3. ...and how many box their branch to a frame
grep -rn --include='*.kt' -A2 'Crossfade(' . | grep -cE 'fillMaxSize\(\)|contentAlignment'

1. → observed: Alignment$Companion.getTopStart followed by maybeCachedBoxMeasurePolicy, twice — once in the transition overload's body and once in its own Crossfade$lambda$7$0 content lambda. The plain overload has neither: it calls updateTransition and delegates to the transition overload, which is why no entry point escapes the policy. A box measure policy takes the maximum of its children's sizes; the alignment is where a smaller child lands inside that. Neither is configurable through Crossfade — the only lever you have is the children.
2. → observed: on the order of a hundred sites.
3. → observed: a small handful. The gap is not a bug list: go through it looking only for branches whose intrinsic heights differ, and frame those. Everything swapping equal-sized content can stay as it is.

Then, by hand: put the control into the state whose child is shorter, and watch the moment the transition ends rather than the moment it starts. A settle, a hop, or a few pixels of vertical movement after the fade completes is this bug; a clean fade with nothing moving afterwards is the frame doing its job. Do it once at a small window size too — a frame that is only tall enough in one layout hides the same problem.