Request Apexyard Feature

/request-apexyard-feature — Request a Framework Feature Upstream

Read .claude/rules/writing-standard.md. Use the controlled technical writing profile for the upstream feature request: state the outcome and reason before detail.

Files a structured GitHub Issue proposing a feature or enhancement for the apexyard framework itself to the canonical upstream me2resh/apexyard — for a new skill, a new hook, a rule improvement, a better workflow, etc.

This is the framework-feedback sibling of /feature. The difference is the target:

Leak protection (mandatory). This skill writes to a PUBLIC framework repo. NEVER include a registered private project's name, repo slug, or workspace path. Per .claude/rules/leak-protection.md, describe the motivating context generically ("while onboarding a project", "during bulk ticket filing"). The block-private-refs-in-public-repos.sh hook is the backstop; scrub at authoring time.

Usage

/request-apexyard-feature a /reindex skill for manual MCP reindexing
/request-apexyard-feature let /handover pick which docs to generate
/request-apexyard-feature a hook that warns on stale review markers

Process

0. Write the active-issue-skill marker (REQUIRED — me2resh/apexyard#268)

# Resolve the ops-fork root the SAME way the hooks do (_lib-ops-root.sh):
# anchor on the .apexyard-fork marker (split-portfolio v2 — onboarding.yaml
# lives in the sibling portfolio repo, NOT the ops fork), falling back to the
# onboarding.yaml + apexyard.projects.yaml pair (single-fork v1).
ops_root="$PWD"; r="$PWD"
while [ "$r" != / ]; do
  if [ -f "$r/.apexyard-fork" ] || { [ -f "$r/onboarding.yaml" ] && [ -f "$r/apexyard.projects.yaml" ]; }; then
    ops_root="$r"; break
  fi
  r=${r%/*}
done
mkdir -p "$ops_root/.claude/session"
echo "request-apexyard-feature" > "$ops_root/.claude/session/active-issue-skill"

Remove the marker on every exit path (success, cancel, error):

rm -f "$ops_root/.claude/session/active-issue-skill"

1. Resolve the upstream repo

Always files upstream, regardless of the adopter's fork origin:

UPSTREAM=$(git remote get-url upstream 2>/dev/null \
  | sed -E 's#(git@github.com:|https://github.com/)##; s#\.git$##')
UPSTREAM="${UPSTREAM:-me2resh/apexyard}"

If $UPSTREAM doesn't resolve to me2resh/apexyard, confirm with the user or default to the canonical slug before filing.

2. Capture the framework version

Do NOT use git describe --tags --abbrev=0. Under the release-cut branch model, release tags (vX.Y.Z) are created on main and are NOT ancestors of dev, so git describe from a dev checkout reports a stale version (observed: v1.1.0 when the line is actually v2.2.0) — every issue filed from dev would be mislabeled (#503). Derive from CHANGELOG.md instead, which /release-sync carries main → dev, so it is always current on dev:

# Primary: top-most `## [X.Y.Z]` heading in CHANGELOG.md (carried main→dev by
# /release-sync, so always the canonical current version on dev).
FW_VERSION=$(grep -m1 -oE '^## \[v?[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]' "$ops_root/CHANGELOG.md" 2>/dev/null \
  | grep -oE '[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+')
if [ -n "$FW_VERSION" ]; then
  FW_VERSION="v$FW_VERSION"          # keep the `v` prefix the field renders today
else
  # Fallbacks: highest semver tag across ALL refs (catches main-only release
  # tags via -v:refname sort) → short HEAD → literal "unknown".
  FW_VERSION=$(git -C "$ops_root" tag --sort=-v:refname 2>/dev/null | head -1)
  [ -z "$FW_VERSION" ] && FW_VERSION=$(git -C "$ops_root" rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null)
  [ -z "$FW_VERSION" ] && FW_VERSION="unknown"
fi

3. Gather details (one question at a time)

Ask conversationally — do NOT batch. Wait for each answer.

a) The problem / friction — what's awkward or missing in the framework today? (the why, not the solution)

b) Proposed behaviour — what should the framework do? (new skill / hook / rule / agent / workflow change — name it concretely)

c) Why it helps adopters — who benefits and how; what they do instead today.

d) Scope hint (optional) — anything explicitly out of scope, or a rough size.

e) Related (optional) — existing skills/hooks it touches, related issue numbers.

4. Show the formatted issue for confirmation

Substitute into this body and display for yes / edit / cancel. Re-scan for any private project name before showing it.

Here's the framework feature request I'll file to <UPSTREAM>:

---
**[Feature] {title}**

## Problem
{the friction / gap in the framework today}

## Proposed behaviour
{what the framework should do — new skill / hook / rule / agent / workflow}

## Why it helps adopters
{who benefits + how; what they do today instead}

## Scope / out of scope
{scope hint or "—"}

## Framework version
{FW_VERSION}

## Related
{touched skills/hooks + related issues, or "—"}

## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| {term} | {definition} |
---

Labels: enhancement
Repo: <UPSTREAM>

File this upstream? (yes / edit / cancel)

5. Handle response

• yes → create the issue
• edit / change X → update, re-show
• cancel / no → abort (and remove the marker)

6. Create the GitHub Issue

gh issue create --repo "$UPSTREAM" \
  --title "[Feature] {title}" \
  --label "enhancement" \
  --body "{formatted body}"

If the enhancement label doesn't exist upstream, drop --label and note it.

7. Return the URL

Filed upstream: <UPSTREAM>#{number} — {title}
{url}

Rules

1. One question at a time. Never batch. Wait for each answer.
2. Always confirm before filing. Show the full issue, get explicit "yes".
3. Scrub private project names — this writes to a PUBLIC repo. See .claude/rules/leak-protection.md. Use the <!-- private-refs: allow --> marker ONLY on explicit user confirmation.
4. Always file upstream — me2resh/apexyard.
5. Lead with the problem, not the solution — the "why" makes a feature request actionable.
6. Label enhancement. Title prefix [Feature].

Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.