Audit Enforceability

Audit which review findings a deterministic check could catch instead of a model re-deriving them every run: read ONE operator-named findings file, derive a finding class per row, map it through the crosswalk to the cheapest enforcement rung (editorconfig severity, analyzer-pack rule, custom analyzer, Semgrep rule, architecture test, hook, or llm-only), and write one proposal stub per finding naming that rung and its owner. Use when: 'which of these findings could a linter or analyzer catch', 'audit enforceability', 'promote findings to a deterministic check', 'what rung catches this', 'can we stop re-finding this'. 'Enforceability' here means whether ONE finding can be caught deterministically; it is not the question of whether a convention is machine-checkable, and not the C1-C5 promotion the autonomy work classes use. Read-only on the reviewed code and on the findings file it reads; the memory-tier stubs it writes are its report. It proposes a rung and never implements one.

melodic-software 39dc487 8 files · 118.0 KB Updated

File contents

melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/tree/main/plugins/review/skills/audit-enforceability commit 39dc4876a7

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add melodic-software/audit-enforceability