Brainstorming
Two phases, kept separate: first go wide without judging, then pick.
1) Diverge — quantity first
- Produce a batch of distinct ideas (aim for ~8–12), not three safe ones.
- Deliberately vary the angle so they're not minor variants:
- the obvious solid choice,
- a cheap/fast/minimal one,
- a premium/ambitious one,
- a weird/contrarian one,
- one borrowed from a different domain.
- Don't critique yet. Wild ideas often seed the good one.
2) Converge — pick and sharpen
- Note the 2–3 strongest against what the user actually cares about (cost, time, risk, fit).
- Say why they win, and what the trade-off of each is.
- Offer one concrete next step for the top pick.
Prompts to break a stuck spot
- "What would this look like if it were 10x simpler? 10x bigger?"
- "What are we assuming that might not be true?"
- "How would <a different field/person> solve this?"
- "What's the version we'd be slightly embarrassed to suggest?"
Guidance
- Keep each idea to a tight phrase, not a paragraph — it's a menu, not an essay.
- For naming, give a varied list (descriptive, playful, abstract) and check the obvious clashes.
- End by helping them choose; a pile of options without a recommendation isn't done.