EF6 Code-First to EF Core Migration
Overview
Migrates Entity Framework 6 Code-First projects to EF Core. This skill covers projects that already use DbContext with fluent or data-annotation-based models — no EDMX files involved.
STOP — is the old app still running? If a .NET Framework host and a new .NET host share this database while both are live (a side-by-side migration), load the
managing-shared-database-schemaskill first and follow it instead of Step 7 here:get_instructions(kind='skill', query='managing-shared-database-schema')This skill never deletes
Migrations/orMigrations/Configuration.cs. Those assets are the EF6 schema ledger. While any EF6 host is still live, they are the only way to deploy further schema changes, and removing them is not recoverable. Teardown belongs to full cutover only — seeref/cutover-teardown.md.This gate applies to the EDMX path below as well. If the scope note routes you to
migrating-edmx-to-code-first, the same prohibition travels with you: during a side-by-side window, do not delete the migration assets and do not enable startup migration, whichever skill you end up in.If you cannot tell, assume the database is shared. Whether the Framework host stays live against this database frequently is not determinable from the repo alone. Unless you can positively confirm it is retired or runs against its own database, take the shared branch and load the skill first — the destructive steps here are correct only for a full cutover.
Scope: This skill targets EF6 Code-First projects (no
.edmxfiles). For EDMX-based projects (Database-First/Model-First), use themigrating-edmx-to-code-firstskill instead. For DbContext registration and DI setup during ASP.NET Core migration, also apply themigrating-ef-dbcontextskill — it is complementary to this one.
Workflow
Migration Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Assess EF6 usage
- [ ] Step 2: Swap NuGet packages
- [ ] Step 3: Update namespaces
- [ ] Step 4: Migrate DbContext and configuration
- [ ] Step 5: Migrate entity configurations
- [ ] Step 6: Handle breaking API changes
- [ ] Step 7: Establish the EF Core migrations baseline
- [ ] Step 8: Validate
- [ ] Step 9: Full-cutover teardown — only if the old host is retired; skipped during a side-by-side window
Step 1: Assess EF6 Usage
- Confirm the project uses EF6 Code-First (has a
DbContextsubclass, no.edmxfiles) - List all
DbContextsubclasses and theirDbSet<T>properties - Find
EntityTypeConfiguration<T>classes andOnModelCreatingoverrides - Search for EF6-specific APIs:
Database.SetInitializer,DbModelBuilder,HasDatabaseGeneratedOption,Map(),MapToStoredProcedures() - Check for custom conventions (
IConvention,Convention) - Note any raw SQL usage:
Database.SqlQuery<T>(),Database.ExecuteSqlCommand() - Check for the EF6
Configurationclass generated byEnable-Migrations(typically inMigrations/Configuration.cs) — note its presence; it is retained unless the user confirms a full cutover - Confirm with the user before proceeding: if the project targets .NET Framework, advise upgrading to .NET 8 or later and updating EntityFramework to 6.5.1 first
Step 2: Swap NuGet Packages
Remove the EF6 package and add EF Core packages matching the target framework.
<!-- Remove -->
<PackageReference Include="EntityFramework" />
<!-- Add (choose the appropriate database provider) -->
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools" />
If EF6 migration assets are being retained (Step 7 — another host still writes this database), removing the
EntityFrameworkpackage breaks them: EF6DbMigrationandDbMigrationsConfigurationclasses are compiled code that depends on it. Two options:
- Preferred — exclude the retained folder from compilation with
<Compile Remove="Migrations\**" />, then remove theEntityFrameworkpackage as normal. The EF6 ledger stays on disk as the historical record without being built.- Alternative — keep the
EntityFrameworkreference alongside the EF Core ones, leaving the EF6 migrations compiled. Use this only if something in this project still needs to run them.Decide this now — Step 7 depends on it. Note that the exclusion glob is recursive, so EF Core migrations must be scaffolded outside
Migrations/(Step 7 does this).
Use the EF Core major version that matches the project's target framework (e.g., EF Core 8.x for .NET 8, EF Core 10.x for .NET 10). Use the managing-package-references skill to add these packages — it handles version determination, CPM detection, and NuGet feed lookup.
Step 3: Update Namespaces
Replace System.Data.Entity usings with Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore in application code. Note that System.Data.Entity.Validation and System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects are removed entirely in EF Core — replace with custom validation and DbContext APIs respectively.
Exclude a retained EF6
Migrations/folder from this replacement. Those files are EF6 migration classes (DbMigration,DbMigrationsConfiguration) built onSystem.Data.Entity.Migrations. Rewriting their usings destroys the EF6 ledger exactly as deleting it would, only silently — the folder survives while ceasing to be valid EF6 migrations. See Step 7.
Step 4: Migrate DbContext and Configuration
- Change constructor to accept
DbContextOptions<T>instead of a connection string name - Change
OnModelCreatingparameter fromDbModelBuildertoModelBuilder
Database initializers: EF Core does not support Database.SetInitializer or the MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion initializer. Remove all initializer calls and convert seed logic to HasData() in OnModelCreating or a separate seed method called at startup.
The EF6
Configurationclass (typicallyMigrations/Configuration.cs) has no EF Core equivalent, but do not delete it here. It is retained until a confirmed full cutover — seeref/cutover-teardown.md.
Step 5: Migrate Entity Configurations
- Convert
EntityTypeConfiguration<T>toIEntityTypeConfiguration<T>(addConfigure(EntityTypeBuilder<T>)method, prefix all calls withbuilder.) - Replace
HasRequired/HasOptionalwithHasOne+.IsRequired(), andWithRequired/WithOptionalwithWithOne+.IsRequired() - Replace
WillCascadeOnDelete(false)withOnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict) - Replace
HasDatabaseGeneratedOption:DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity→ValueGeneratedOnAdd()(database-generated IDs)DatabaseGeneratedOption.Computed→ValueGeneratedOnAddOrUpdate()(computed columns)DatabaseGeneratedOption.None→ Check if you manually assign IDs beforeAdd(). If yes, useValueGeneratedNever(). If no (or using custom HiLo generator), useValueGeneratedOnAdd()or EF Core's built-inUseHiLo()to avoid tracking conflicts from duplicate default IDs
- Replace
Map(m => m.ToTable("Name"))withToTable("Name")directly HasMany().WithMany()requires EF Core 5.0+. For join tables with payload columns, explicit join entity configuration is still requiredMapToStoredProcedures()is removed — useFromSql()orExecuteSql()modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<T>()is removed — overrideConfigureConventions(ModelConfigurationBuilder)on theDbContextto add, remove, or replace conventions
Decimal property precision: EF6 automatically mapped decimal properties to decimal(18,2). EF Core requires explicit precision configuration to avoid silent data truncation:
// EF6 - automatic precision
public decimal Price { get; set; } // Became decimal(18,2) in database
// EF Core - must specify precision
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<Product>()
.Property(p => p.Price)
.HasPrecision(18, 2); // Or use [Column(TypeName = "decimal(18,2)")]
}
Register configurations: Replace modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(...) with modelBuilder.ApplyConfiguration(...) or use modelBuilder.ApplyConfigurationsFromAssembly(typeof(AppDbContext).Assembly) to apply all at once.
Step 6: Handle Breaking API Changes
Raw SQL: Replace Database.SqlQuery<T>() with Set<T>().FromSql() and Database.ExecuteSqlCommand() with Database.ExecuteSql(). Use interpolated strings ($"...") for automatic parameterization — do not use string concatenation, which bypasses EF Core's parameterization and creates SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Lazy loading: EF Core disables lazy loading by default.
- Option 1: Install
Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Proxies, callUseLazyLoadingProxies() - Option 2 (preferred): Use explicit
.Include()for eager loading
Complex types: In EF Core 7 and earlier, [ComplexType] → OwnsOne(). EF Core 8+ reintroduces native support — use ComplexProperty() instead.
Validation: EF Core does not call IValidatableObject.Validate() on SaveChanges(). Add validation in the application layer or override SaveChanges() to call it explicitly.
Step 7: Establish the EF Core Migrations Baseline
First — check whether anything else still writes this database. If any other application,
job, or deployment pipeline still writes this schema — a .NET Framework host, another service, a
SQL Agent job, a DACPAC or DbUp pipeline — stop and follow managing-shared-database-schema.
The steps below assume EF Core is taking over as the sole schema owner.
Advise the user to apply all pending EF6 migrations to their database before starting the EF Core migration — this is a manual prerequisite. Once confirmed:
- Keep the existing
Migrations/folder in place. It is the EF6 schema ledger and remains the record of what was applied. It is removed only at full cutover, underref/cutover-teardown.md. If EF6 and EF Core migration types collide in the same project, exclude the EF6 folder from compilation —<Compile Remove="Migrations\**" />in an SDK-style project — rather than deleting it. Renaming the folder does not exclude it: SDK-style projects glob**/*.cs, soMigrations.EF6/still compiles, and in a non-SDK project renaming breaks the explicit<Compile Include>items instead. If you keep the folder compiled, keep theEntityFrameworkpackage reference too (Step 2). - Create a baseline EF Core migration in its own folder, outside
Migrations/. Present the command and offer to run it with user confirmation:
dotnet ef migrations add InitialCreate --output-dir EFCoreMigrations
Scaffold outside
Migrations/, not into a subfolder of it. EF Core defaults toMigrations/— the same folder holding the EF6DbMigrationclasses andConfiguration. Two reasons a sibling folder is required rather than, say,Migrations/EFCore:
- The exclusion glob in Step 2 (
Migrations\**) is recursive. A nestedMigrations/EFCore/would be excluded from compilation along with the EF6 files, silently leaving the project with no EF Core migrations at all.- Any later "delete the
Migrations/folder" teardown would take the EF Core snapshot with it.Keeping the two ledgers in sibling directories means neither instruction has to know about the other.
Before marking the migration as applied, the user must verify that the existing database schema matches the EF Core model. The user should review the generated migration file (
InitialCreate) and confirm it reflects their current schema — not new changes. If the migration contains unexpected schema alterations, applying it could cause data loss. Only proceed once the user confirms the migration is a clean baseline.Once verified, register the migration as applied without executing it. Generate a script and apply only the history insert:
dotnet ef migrations script --idempotent --output mark-migration.sql
Advise the user to review the generated script and apply only its history-table portions: the conditional CREATE TABLE ... __EFMigrationsHistory block at the top of the script, followed by the INSERT INTO __EFMigrationsHistory statement. This registers the migration as applied without modifying the application schema.
Do not skip the
CREATE TABLEblock. A database that has only ever been managed by EF6 has no__EFMigrationsHistorytable — that is EF Core's ledger, and EF6 never created it. Applying theINSERTon its own therefore fails with an invalid-object error. The--idempotentscript guards the create with an existence check, so running both statements is safe whether or not the table is already there.
Do not use
dotnet ef database updatefor this. That command executes the migration — EF Core has no--fake/ "mark as applied" option. Against a live database whose schema already exists,InitialCreateattempts to create every table and fails, or worse, partially applies. The script approach above is the only safe way to baseline an existing database.
Always pause and confirm with the user before executing any database-modifying command, even in auto-execute mode — these connect to a live database.
EF6's dbo.__MigrationHistory and EF Core's dbo.__EFMigrationsHistory are separate tables
and do not interfere. Leave the EF6 table in place; never copy rows between them.
Step 8: Validate
Compilation alone is not sufficient. Many EF6→EF Core differences only surface at runtime.
LLM responsibilities (automated):
- Build the project and fix compilation errors
- Confirm no EF6 code artifacts remain in the migrated code paths (
System.Data.Entitynamespaces,EntityFrameworkpackage reference). TheMigrations/folder andConfiguration.csare expected to still be present — they are removed only at full cutover. - Run existing unit tests
User responsibilities (require database access and manual verification):
4. Test CRUD operations against the database
5. Verify navigation property loading works as expected (eager vs lazy)
6. Validate change tracking behavior matches expectations (Added, Modified, Deleted states)
7. If stored procedures were migrated, test FromSql/ExecuteSql results
8. Compare query results with the EF6 version for any complex LINQ queries
Present items 4–8 as a checklist for the user — the LLM cannot validate runtime database behavior.
Step 9: Full-Cutover Teardown
Conditional — do not run this during a side-by-side window. Removing the EF6 assets is correct only once the old host is retired and nothing else writes this database.
- If any other host, job, or pipeline still writes this schema: stop here. Steps 1–8 are the
whole job. The EF6
Migrations/folder, theConfigurationclass, anddbo.__MigrationHistoryall stay, and governance for the window belongs tomanaging-shared-database-schema. - Once the old host is confirmed retired, follow
ref/cutover-teardown.md— it carries the confirmation gate and the removal inventory.
Success Criteria
Code migration (always required)
EntityFrameworkNuGet package removed from application code paths, EF Core packages added (the reference is retained if EF6 migration assets are still compiled — see Step 2)- All
System.Data.Entitynamespaces in application code replaced withMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore; a retained EF6Migrations/folder is exempt DbContextconstructor acceptsDbContextOptions- All
EntityTypeConfiguration<T>classes converted toIEntityTypeConfiguration<T> - Fluent API calls updated (
HasRequired→HasOne, etc.) - Raw SQL calls migrated to
FromSql/ExecuteSql - Lazy loading strategy decided and configured
- Complex types converted to owned entities or complex properties
- Database initializer calls removed and seed data migrated to
HasData()or a seed method - Project builds, tests pass, queries return correct results
- No secrets are stored in plain text
Schema-deployment handover (EF Core takes ownership)
Applies only once EF Core owns schema deployment — by default at cutover, and during a
side-by-side window only under the ownership override in managing-shared-database-schema
(Step 2). While EF6 still owns the pen, EF Core is the non-owner and never scaffolds a
migration, so neither criterion below applies and neither is a gap:
- EF Core migrations baseline created and registered via the history-insert script
- Adding a new EF Core migration produces one without any operations (model matches database)
Side-by-side freeze (old host still live)
- EF6
Migrations/folder andConfigurationclass retained - EF6
dbo.__MigrationHistoryretained and untouched - Schema ownership decided per
managing-shared-database-schema - No startup migration enabled in either host
Full cutover only (old host retired)
Applies only after the confirmation gate in ref/cutover-teardown.md:
- EF6
Migrations/folder andConfigurationclass removed - No EF6 artifacts remain anywhere in the solution