PR Review Skill
Generate and post AI-powered PR review comments to GitHub following engineering best practices.
Usage
/review-pr <pr-number> # Generate review (step 1)
/review-pr <pr-number> --post # Post review to GitHub (step 2)
Examples:
/review-pr 180 - Generate review and save to YAML file
/review-pr 180 --post - Post the reviewed YAML to GitHub
What this skill does
Step 1: Generate (/review-pr <number>)
- Fetches PR details from GitHub using the gh CLI
- Performs architectural review (NEW!): Questions design decisions, checks for scope creep, validates use cases
- Analyzes changes for security, testing, design patterns, and code quality issues
- Differentiates contexts: CLI code vs GitHub Actions code (different standards)
- Creates actionable feedback: Specific refactoring suggestions based on file names and patterns
- Generates structured review comments in an editable YAML file
- Shows preview of all generated comments
Step 2: Post (/review-pr <number> --post)
- Reads the YAML file you reviewed/edited
- Posts to GitHub: Submits all enabled comments to the PR
- Automatic fallback: If GitHub API posting fails (e.g., Enterprise Managed User restrictions), automatically generates a markdown file with formatted comments for manual copy/paste
Engineering Review Principles
This skill enforces the following principles:
Architectural Review (NEW!)
- Design Decision Validation: Questions "why" before reviewing "how"
- Scope Creep Detection: Flags expansions beyond Agent365 deployment/management
- Use Case Validation: Requires concrete scenarios for new features
- Overlap Detection: Identifies duplication with existing tools (Azure CLI, Portal)
- YAGNI Enforcement: Questions features without documented need
Architecture & Patterns
- .NET architect patterns: Reviews follow .NET best practices
- Azure CLI alignment: Ensures consistency with az cli patterns and conventions
- Cross-platform compatibility: Validates Windows, Linux, and macOS compatibility (for CLI code)
Design Patterns
- KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid): Prefers simple, straightforward solutions
- DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself): Identifies code duplication
- SOLID principles: Especially Single Responsibility Principle
- YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It): Avoids over-engineering
- One class per file: Enforces clean code organization
Code Quality
- No large files: Flags files over 500 additions
- Function reuse: Encourages reusing functions across commands
- No special characters: Avoids emojis in logs/output (Windows compatibility)
- Self-documenting code: Prefers clear code over excessive comments
- Crisp comments (pr-code-reviewer #30): Flags added comments that run past 1-2 lines, restate the code, or narrate design history — a comment says why in one line; long-form reasoning belongs in the commit/PR.
- Release-note-ready CHANGELOG (pr-code-reviewer #31): Flags
CHANGELOG.md entries that name internals, explain mechanism, or run multiple sentences — each entry is one crisp consumer-facing sentence (it ships verbatim to nuget.org release notes).
- Minimal changes: Makes only necessary changes to solve the problem
Testing Standards
- Framework: xUnit, FluentAssertions, NSubstitute for .NET; pytest/unittest for Python
- Quality over quantity: Focus on critical paths and edge cases
- CLI reliability: CLI code without tests is BLOCKING
- GitHub Actions tests: Strongly recommended (HIGH severity) but not blocking
- Mock external dependencies: Proper mocking patterns
Security
- No hardcoded secrets: Use environment variables or Azure Key Vault
- Credential management: Follow az cli patterns for CLI code; use GitHub Secrets for Actions
Context Awareness
The skill differentiates between:
- CLI code (strict requirements): Cross-platform, reliable, must have tests
- GitHub Actions code (GitHub-specific): Linux-only is acceptable, tests strongly recommended
Review Comments Output
Generated comments are saved to:
C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Temp\pr-reviews\pr-<number>-review.yaml
You can edit this file to:
- Disable comments by setting
enabled: false
- Modify comment text
- Adjust severity levels (blocking, high, medium, low, info)
- Add or remove comments
Implementation
The skill uses Claude Code directly for semantic code analysis (inspired by Agent365-dotnet). No separate API key required!
Generate mode (default):
- Claude Code reads
.claude/agents/pr-code-reviewer.md for review process guidelines. Read the working-tree (PR) version of this file and of .github/copilot-instructions.md and CLAUDE.md — not the base-branch copy. When the PR under review adds or changes a review rule (as PR #461 did with rules #30/#31), the new rule must be applied to that same PR in the same run; reading the base copy would skip it.
- Claude Code reads
.github/copilot-instructions.md for coding standards
- Claude Code fetches PR details:
gh pr view <number> --json ...
- Claude Code analyzes actual code changes:
gh pr diff <number>
- Claude Code performs semantic analysis using its own capabilities
- Claude Code identifies specific issues with line numbers and code references
- Claude Code writes YAML file to
C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Temp\pr-reviews\pr-<number>-review.yaml
Post mode (with --post flag):
- Python script reads the YAML file
- Python script posts comments to GitHub using
gh pr comment
- If posting fails (API permissions), automatically generates markdown file for manual copy/paste
Key Advantages:
- ✅ No
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY required - uses Claude Code's existing authentication
- ✅ Better semantic analysis - Claude Code has full context and conversation history
- ✅ Simpler Python script - only handles posting logic (~240 lines vs ~1500 lines)
- ✅ Easier to maintain and debug
Workflow
Generate review: /review-pr 180
- Fetches PR details from GitHub
- Analyzes code and generates review comments
- Saves to YAML file (shows path in output)
Review and edit: Open the YAML file
- Review all generated comments
- Edit comment text if needed
- Disable comments by setting
enabled: false
- Add your own comments if desired
Post to GitHub: /review-pr 180 --post
- Reads the YAML file
- Posts all enabled comments to the PR
- If API posting fails, automatically generates a markdown file for manual copy/paste
Requirements
- GitHub CLI (
gh) installed and authenticated
- Python 3.x (only for --post mode)
- PyYAML library:
pip install pyyaml (only for --post mode)
- Repository must be a GitHub repository
- GitHub API permissions to post reviews (Enterprise Managed Users may have restrictions)
See Also
- README.md - Detailed documentation
- review-pr.py - Implementation script
1---2name: review-pr-23description: Generate structured PR review comments using Claude Code agents and post them to GitHub. No API key required - uses Claude Code's existing authentication.4---56# PR Review Skill78Generate and post AI-powered PR review comments to GitHub following engineering best practices.910## Usage1112```bash13/review-pr <pr-number> # Generate review (step 1)14/review-pr <pr-number> --post # Post review to GitHub (step 2)15```1617Examples:18- `/review-pr 180` - Generate review and save to YAML file19- `/review-pr 180 --post` - Post the reviewed YAML to GitHub2021## What this skill does2223**Step 1: Generate** (`/review-pr <number>`)241. **Fetches PR details** from GitHub using the gh CLI252. **Performs architectural review** (NEW!): Questions design decisions, checks for scope creep, validates use cases263. **Analyzes changes** for security, testing, design patterns, and code quality issues274. **Differentiates contexts**: CLI code vs GitHub Actions code (different standards)285. **Creates actionable feedback**: Specific refactoring suggestions based on file names and patterns296. **Generates structured review comments** in an editable YAML file307. **Shows preview** of all generated comments3132**Step 2: Post** (`/review-pr <number> --post`)331. **Reads the YAML file** you reviewed/edited342. **Posts to GitHub**: Submits all enabled comments to the PR353. **Automatic fallback**: If GitHub API posting fails (e.g., Enterprise Managed User restrictions), automatically generates a markdown file with formatted comments for manual copy/paste3637## Engineering Review Principles3839This skill enforces the following principles:4041### Architectural Review (NEW!)42- **Design Decision Validation**: Questions "why" before reviewing "how"43- **Scope Creep Detection**: Flags expansions beyond Agent365 deployment/management44- **Use Case Validation**: Requires concrete scenarios for new features45- **Overlap Detection**: Identifies duplication with existing tools (Azure CLI, Portal)46- **YAGNI Enforcement**: Questions features without documented need4748### Architecture & Patterns49- **.NET architect patterns**: Reviews follow .NET best practices50- **Azure CLI alignment**: Ensures consistency with az cli patterns and conventions51- **Cross-platform compatibility**: Validates Windows, Linux, and macOS compatibility (for CLI code)5253### Design Patterns54- **KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid)**: Prefers simple, straightforward solutions55- **DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)**: Identifies code duplication56- **SOLID principles**: Especially Single Responsibility Principle57- **YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)**: Avoids over-engineering58- **One class per file**: Enforces clean code organization5960### Code Quality61- **No large files**: Flags files over 500 additions62- **Function reuse**: Encourages reusing functions across commands63- **No special characters**: Avoids emojis in logs/output (Windows compatibility)64- **Self-documenting code**: Prefers clear code over excessive comments65- **Crisp comments (pr-code-reviewer #30)**: Flags added comments that run past 1-2 lines, restate the code, or narrate design history — a comment says *why* in one line; long-form reasoning belongs in the commit/PR.66- **Release-note-ready CHANGELOG (pr-code-reviewer #31)**: Flags `CHANGELOG.md` entries that name internals, explain mechanism, or run multiple sentences — each entry is one crisp consumer-facing sentence (it ships verbatim to nuget.org release notes).67- **Minimal changes**: Makes only necessary changes to solve the problem6869### Testing Standards70- **Framework**: xUnit, FluentAssertions, NSubstitute for .NET; pytest/unittest for Python71- **Quality over quantity**: Focus on critical paths and edge cases72- **CLI reliability**: CLI code without tests is BLOCKING73- **GitHub Actions tests**: Strongly recommended (HIGH severity) but not blocking74- **Mock external dependencies**: Proper mocking patterns7576### Security77- **No hardcoded secrets**: Use environment variables or Azure Key Vault78- **Credential management**: Follow az cli patterns for CLI code; use GitHub Secrets for Actions7980### Context Awareness81The skill differentiates between:82- **CLI code** (strict requirements): Cross-platform, reliable, must have tests83- **GitHub Actions code** (GitHub-specific): Linux-only is acceptable, tests strongly recommended8485## Review Comments Output8687Generated comments are saved to:88```89C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Temp\pr-reviews\pr-<number>-review.yaml90```9192You can edit this file to:93- Disable comments by setting `enabled: false`94- Modify comment text95- Adjust severity levels (blocking, high, medium, low, info)96- Add or remove comments9798## Implementation99100The skill uses **Claude Code directly** for semantic code analysis (inspired by Agent365-dotnet). No separate API key required!101102**Generate mode** (default):1031. Claude Code reads `.claude/agents/pr-code-reviewer.md` for review process guidelines. Read the **working-tree (PR) version** of this file and of `.github/copilot-instructions.md` and `CLAUDE.md` — not the base-branch copy. When the PR under review *adds or changes a review rule* (as PR #461 did with rules #30/#31), the new rule must be applied to that same PR in the same run; reading the base copy would skip it.1042. Claude Code reads `.github/copilot-instructions.md` for coding standards1053. Claude Code fetches PR details: `gh pr view <number> --json ...`1064. Claude Code analyzes actual code changes: `gh pr diff <number>`1075. Claude Code performs semantic analysis using its own capabilities1086. Claude Code identifies specific issues with line numbers and code references1097. Claude Code writes YAML file to `C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Temp\pr-reviews\pr-<number>-review.yaml`110111**Post mode** (with --post flag):1121. Python script reads the YAML file1132. Python script posts comments to GitHub using `gh pr comment`1143. If posting fails (API permissions), automatically generates markdown file for manual copy/paste115116**Key Advantages**:117- ✅ No `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` required - uses Claude Code's existing authentication118- ✅ Better semantic analysis - Claude Code has full context and conversation history119- ✅ Simpler Python script - only handles posting logic (~240 lines vs ~1500 lines)120- ✅ Easier to maintain and debug121122## Workflow1231241. **Generate review**: `/review-pr 180`125 - Fetches PR details from GitHub126 - Analyzes code and generates review comments127 - Saves to YAML file (shows path in output)1281292. **Review and edit**: Open the YAML file130 - Review all generated comments131 - Edit comment text if needed132 - Disable comments by setting `enabled: false`133 - Add your own comments if desired1341353. **Post to GitHub**: `/review-pr 180 --post`136 - Reads the YAML file137 - Posts all enabled comments to the PR138 - If API posting fails, automatically generates a markdown file for manual copy/paste139140## Requirements141142- GitHub CLI (`gh`) installed and authenticated143- Python 3.x (only for --post mode)144- PyYAML library: `pip install pyyaml` (only for --post mode)145- Repository must be a GitHub repository146- GitHub API permissions to post reviews (Enterprise Managed Users may have restrictions)147148## See Also149150- [README.md](README.md) - Detailed documentation151- [review-pr.py](review-pr.py) - Implementation script